Talk:Dental anatomy

Dentistry Top‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy: Gross High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 20, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted

Distinguishing characteristics of teeth

In this section, I have added the introductions from their respective articles for each tooth. Some of the introductory information in these articles are similar. It may be beneficial to re-organize the section by incisors, canines, premolars, and molars, and then have subsections of the individual teeth. Obviously, more specific content about each teeth need to be added to the individual articles and to these subsections. I just have not had a chance to do so yet, but maxillary central incisor should be a model for the rest of them. - Dozenist talk 13:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Section was reorganized. Important information about the distinctive features of each tooth still need to be added. - - Dozenist talk 13:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I was highly dissapionted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Mary Di Valerio 18:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What are you talking about? And why so emphatic? (!!!!) · jersyko talk 18:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've just wasted over an hour surfing a dozen disorganized dental articles, looking for some basic dental terminology. Here for example: The image uses a nonstandard numbering system. Can we do no better? Wikipedia has way too many conflicting, redundant, overlapping and incomplete articles in the various "Dental" (Anatomy) sections. Many need to be organized, combined, re-written and/or eliminated. Thanks for what we have; but they need editing. IMHO HalFonts (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Medial" ???

This article contains several occurrences of the word medial to describe the direction toward the centreline of the face. It was my understanding that the correct term is mesial (with an S). I'm not a dentist, however, so before I just go in and change all the "medial"s to "mesial", I wanted to ask here, just in case I'm confused. Richwales (talk · contribs · review) 06:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed this problem (see here). Richwales (talk · contribs · review) 14:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tooth Diagram dental notation

The illustration for the article, File:Teeth_diagram.png, numbers the teeth, but the numbering does not correspond to any of the three Dental notation systems discussed in the article, the FDI_World_Dental_Federation_notation, Universal_numbering_system_(dental), or Palmer_Notation_Method. I think it would help reduce confusion if someone were to renumber the illustration using one (or more) of the discussed systems. It would certainly help to mention the notation system used in numbering the illustration or to state that it is a non-standard numbering. --AJim (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bicuspid/tricuspid

Should there be mention of bicuspid teeth and tricuspid teeth (found in primates)? Jack (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dental anatomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]