Jump to content

Talk:Llandaff Cathedral

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 01:01, 15 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 6 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Architecture}}, {{WikiProject Historic sites}}, {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject Anglicanism}}, {{WikiProject Cardiff}}, {{WikiProject Wales}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleLlandaff Cathedral has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 19, 2016Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 2, 2012, January 2, 2014, January 2, 2017, January 2, 2018, and January 2, 2021.

Book of Llandaff

[edit]

A reference to the Book of Llandaff has been removed. The bishops resided at Mathern in their diocese until the mid eighteenth century. Only a few stones remain from the Italianate Temple and if visible are not in situ----Clive Sweeting

The reference to the Book of Llandaff has not been removed, it has been transferred to Diocese of Llandaff because it was more relevant to that article. This have been noted in the history. Walgamanus 10:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SW tower and the Great Storm of 1703.

[edit]

Can anyone provide a reliable source or a Cathedral document on the Great Storm of 1703? I note there is a local source saying the "The battlements of the north-west tower of Llandaff cathedral collapsed" and numerous sources mirroring wikipedia. Thanks in advance.JRPG (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We hope, I suspect that like me you have both Welsh and coal mining roots. I now live in Leicester but would dearly love to find out more about the 1703 storm damage. If, and only if, you have time, would it be possible to see if there are any Glamorgan records JRPG (talk) 21:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lay Clerks Entry

[edit]

This entry is now far too long and far too detailed and now has a significant number of '????' entries. The opening pages of this page should surely just list people past and present in very senior positions. To have a major section on Lay Clerks is questionable but to split the list into detailed sub-sections is totally disproportionate. It is also a concern that the entry has been made without the knowledge of the Director of Music, The Cathedral Administrator or the Cathedral Clergy. I would ask that the originator reviews this entry as it now looks very amateurish.

Eglwysllandaff (talk) 09:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The entry certainly needs revision as it contains a considerable number of omissions and also inaccuracies such as denoting Singing Men etc as Lay Clerks. The limited number of Lay Clerk posts and the length of service of many, means that even a complete list since 1950 is relatively small and does not require an extensive entry. However, it would be churlish to ignore the considerable contribution to the life of the Cathedral made by her professional Lay Clerks, many of whom served faithfully for several decades. Historically, it also seems fitting to mark the end of Wales' only professional lay-clerk establishment as the Cathedral moves into a different era. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.81.18 (talk) 01:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Llandaff Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Llandaff Cathedral/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I'll have this to you soon JAGUAR  17:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need to tell you something about the sources before you start. While working on this, I was able to use both Google Books and HathiTrust sources which are only full view in the US, so those will show up as limited search only. We hope (talk) 17:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up! JAGUAR  18:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]
  • "the damage to the cathedral was so extensive that the church seriously considered removal of the see" - link Episcopal see here, as I didn't know what this meant!
  • "the cathedral was severely damaged when a parachute mine was dropped blowing the roof off the nave" - this is a run-on. Try a semi-colon in between "dropped" and "blowing"
  • "The cathedral was dedicated to St. Peter and St. Paul, St. Dubricius, St. Teilo and St. Oudoceus" - no full stops in "St" for British English. I don't mind if you ignore this as it's extremely pedantic! Maybe something to bear in mind for FAC
  • "Sir David ap Mathew was 'Grand Standard Bearer of England'," - double quotes needed
  • "granted under King Edward IV" - link Edward IV of England
  • "for saving his life at the Battle of Towton, 29 March 1461 (War Of The Roses). [29]" - extra space before the citation. Also, I think this might sound more fluid as for saving his life at the Battle of Towton, as part of the War Of The Roses. (link War of Roses too)
  • "Wood produced an Italian Temple" - does temple need to be capitalised?
  • "attempt to transfer the see-this time to Bristol" - em dash needed
  • "Edward VII, then Prince of Wales and the Marquess of Bute were among those" - Edward VII (then Prince of Wales), and the Marquess of Bute were among those
  • "On the evening of 2 January 1941 during the Second World War the cathedral was severely damaged" - comma needed between "War" and "the"
  • "and there was also damage to the organ" - delink organ here, as it's already been linked
  • "Construction began of grander building under the orders" - a grander
  • "but his wook on the temple was still not complete by 1752" - work
  • "It wasn't until 1840 that in the wake of industrial development in Cardiff" - was not
  • "who was able to hire Pre-Raphaelite artists" - should 'pre' be capitalised?
  • The caption for the picture of the door ("The Door") could be a bit more descriptive, is it the main door on the front side etc?
  • "but the costs of about 1 million pounds" - £1 million
  • I notice that the Burials section has a "this list is incomplete" tag, might be worth just removing it. Something like this would never hold back a GAN
  • No dead links
  • No dab links either

Excellent work with this! I was keeping an eye on it when it was being written. I checked the majority of the references I could check as I went along, and I couldn't find any issues with that either. There is no major close paraphrasing, so that's looking good. Some of the suggestions I made were minor; like the full stop after "St" can definitely be ignored, but it's worth considering if you're planning to send this to FAC. Other than that it was pretty flawless! On hold. JAGUAR  23:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, kind sir! I think I've gotten everything done on the list. ;-) We hope (talk) 00:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for addressing them so quickly! Without further ado I'll promote this. JAGUAR  13:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh or English name?

[edit]

What's preferred here-the Welsh name as the article has had since it was started or the English name? We hope (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bear in mind that changing this would likely mean changing the names of all Church in Wales articles and needs consensus. We hope (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The full name ought to be included somewhere. I have no objection whatsoever to the Welsh name being included too. I removed the Welsh name from the infobox because I thought displaying two names there looked clumsy, and I didn't expect anyone to object since the Welsh name was already given in the first sentence. Zacwill (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@We hope: if you can't explain what your objection actually is (it can't be that I'm removing the Welsh name from the article, since I'm not) I will restore the edit. Zacwill (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My first objection is that I posted this here to allow others to comment. They should be given more than two days to do so. My other objections are as posted above. We hope (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As I have said, your objections make no sense. If you insist, I'll leave this a while in the off-chance that anyone else would want to comment. Zacwill (talk) 13:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My interest is in keeping some type of consistency re: naming for the Wales Project. I no longer have plans to expand the article for a try at FA. We hope (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Right, it's been over a month and no one but you has objected, so I'm restoring the full name. Zacwill (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well update the bishop while you're at it. We hope (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing Zacwill (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]