Jump to content

User talk:OiYoiYoink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Voorts (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 22 January 2024 (Proposed deletion of Animan: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Eric Charles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Ynhockey (Talk) 18:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Man's Country (bathhouse) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLI 04:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eric Charles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLI 04:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Oli, can you please provide examples of how my submission allegedly fails to demonstrate a neutral and encyclopedic tone? I fail to understand this rationale. Eric (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man's Country (bathhouse) has been accepted

Man's Country (bathhouse), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Bkissin! I appreciate your help and am thrilled to be able to contribute my first article and help preserve some local history. Eric (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Coast (bar) has been accepted

Gold Coast (bar), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help! Eric (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:GoldCoastExterior.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:GoldCoastExterior.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Animan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable comic artist. The only two reliable sources with significant coverage that I could find are cited in the article. One of the sources lacks independence because it's an interview and the other source is run-of-the-mill reporting on an internet meme based on the artist's work. The remaining sources cited are the author's website, IMDb, Know Your Meme, and social media.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I concede that articles about the illustrator are extremely scarce and publicly available scholarly or news reporting is all but non-existent. However, that is common for LGBT figures, especially erotic artists. Deletion feels like an excessive remedy and is disappointing. OiYoiYoink (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you're coming from, but unfortunately, Wikipedia's notability guidelines (including the guideline for artists are quite clear that only artists or illustrators who have had significant coverage in independent sources are noteworthy enough to have a Wikipedia article written about them. Might there be another article that the information you've written in this article can be merged into? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! voorts (talk/contributions) 23:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted OiYoiYoink (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]