Jump to content

Talk:Obelisk (biology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bremps (talk | contribs) at 01:15, 1 February 2024 (requesting move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconViruses Unassessed High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Obelisk - merger(s) would help?

Currently - seems there's several wikilinks to the purportedly newly discovered life form "obelisk" - "Obelisk (virology)" and "Obelisk (life form)" and "Obelisk (viroid)" - perhaps some merger(s) would help? - Comments Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support mergers JM (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least two of these three names are a bit problematic:
Science (journal) uses viruslike entity. JM (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I used "(virology)" because the subject is quite obviously being studied by virologists. I'm very, very curious how this topic develops...--Paragem (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that all proposed names are better than "(life form)". I also suggest "(biology)". When I read the Nature article, its description seems to be less sensational than the article (and especially the proposed WP:ITN/C entry). —PaleoNeonate00:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the news nomination

Better image

Don't you think that the current image (an Egyptian obelisk) it is a bit confusing ?

I think a proper image could be something like this of a viroid :

Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, the RNA folds into an obelisk-like shape, not into rods. Also, the RNA might spiral around its longitudinal axis. Maybe we could just hang around like sloths for a while, and look what illustrations the scientific journals will come up with--Paragem (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Requested move 1 February 2024

Obelisk (life form)Obelisk (biology) – Per User:User:PaleoNeonate's suggestion Bremps... 01:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]