Talk:Propeller.com

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as TechCrunch, Search Engine Journal, and Search Engine Watch, it is definitely noteworthy. TheGiftedOne (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Growth

The growth section, I believe, is completely wrong. First of all, Propeller.com was launched in September when Netscape moved out - no wonder the growth was extreme. According to Alexa, however, the number of visitors is steadily declining. Second, Digg and Propeller are no bookmarking sites. Third, Propeller is not near Digg [1]. All in all, I think the section is completely misleading and should be deleted. NisseSthlm (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I deleted it. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Propeller.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122225901/http://www.aolnews.com/category/goodbye-propeller/ to http://www.aolnews.com/category/goodbye-propeller/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://angryken.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080101104849/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529 to http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]