User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2015/Mar

Question about change to Provenance article

Hello, I am very new to editing Wikipedia and I am trying to learn by doing some small edits where I think they are needed. I just tried doing a minor edit on the entry for Provenance/Archives. I added an external link to lead the user to the journal Provenance, which was mentioned. When you first undid my edit I thought it was because I made a mistake, which I noticed and was going back to fix. However when I did it again, you reverted the edit. I would like to know the reasoning behind it so that I do not make the same mistake again. I could not find what rule I violated when I looked at your "Read this first page." Thanks TheMadGiggler76 (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)TheMadGiggler76

@TheMadGiggler76: I undid your edit twice? My apologies. However, please see WP:EL, our policy in embedding external links within prose. This is more appropriate as a footnote or a link in the "External Links" section. You may see Help:Referencing for beginners if you need help with footnotes. Thanks, Epic Genius (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Editing Wesley Taylor's Page

Hi Epicgenius,

I am a new user and have been trying to edit the content of Wesley Taylor's page. He is a client at Anonymous content, where I intern, and he emailed us a specific bio he would like reflected on his page.

My initial edits were rejected as they lacked citations. I carefully cited the new changes, but received the message below.

"Joseph2302 left a message on your talk page in "March 2015". Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wesley Taylor, you may be blocked from editing."

As a new user, how can I make the changes reflect his requested biography? I apologize for any confusion and appreciate your help!

Best, Talent Intern

Talentintern (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

@Talentintern: I reverted these changes because your edits added unreferenced information in lieu of sourced information. If Wesley Taylor would like to provide references for his changes to his biography, he can do so; otherwise, per our policies on living people and references, the unsourced information can be removed. You can add sources to support your claims. If you need other help on this, you can also go to the Help desk or Reference desk. Epic Genius (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Just so you know, I've also responded to TalentIntern on my talkpage (my reversion reason were slightly different to yours), and also recommended that we use the article talkpage from now on. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Epic Genius (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Epicgenius, Thank you for your help and reply. I am okay with moving this to Wesley's page, and will post a longer response there. Thanks again, Talent Intern — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talentintern (talk • contribs) 01:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Shooting of Michael Brown

To avoid confusion, I moved the draft article to User:ChrisGualtieri/Shooting of Michael Brown--temp. As you know, it can't stay there indefinitely. Draft space , tho basically a good idea, has its limitations. DGG ( talk ) 10:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

@DGG: Thanks for the note. Epic Genius (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Hudson River Ship Canal reverts

Dear User:Epicgenius. Let's work this out. All these articles are convoluted. You can see I'm working on them. If you have a different view, and cites, let's meet at Talk and work it out. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Same goes for your snarky edit summary at the Harlem River river page. My correction was not "wrong", I corrected a "wrong" statement. You took it a step further, which I considered but didn't want to invite just what happened.

Come one, you've racked up over 100K edits at Wikipedia in just over years. You know better than to bowl into things and treat another experienced editor this way. You made a "Bold" revert. I undid it, and am seeing to untangle the three pages involved. If you know better, educate me. But don't try to draw me into an edit war, already well underway. Thank you. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Good to see you at Talk. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

See you back there for a merge/redirect. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

NB: Issues have been resolved. Interested readers, see Talk:Harlem River Ship Canal. Epic Genius (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Waldorf–Astoria (New York, 1893)

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Valhalla train crash

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nightlife legislation in New York City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doormen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you've been called to witness at ANI re Hector Camacho

For your convenience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_violations_of_BLP.2C_WP:AVOIDVICTIM_at_Hector_Camacho

μηδείς (talk) 05:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@Medeis: Thanks for the notice. Epic Genius (talk) 13:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

NYC Transit Police

Hello Epicgenius. ..I am a 22 year veteran of The New York City Transit Police. Every edit I made is a matter of record

@Caryez1: Thank you for your service on the NYC Transit Police. However, our Wikipedia policy says that every edit without a source can be challenged and removed. Please provide a source so that your edit is less likely to be contested. Thanks again, Epic Genius (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@ Epicgenius. .would you please make a change on Police Officer Irma Lozada ' page....change badge number to SHIELD number . In NYC regardless of the department. ..it is referred to as a shield and not a badge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caryez1 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@Caryez1: I will change it this time, but just remember, for next time, you can change it as well. Epic Genius (talk) 13:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Actually,, I cannot change it, because it is part of the infobox and the "badge number" needs to be changed by editing Template:Infobox police officer. Epic Genius (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TseRonnie -- TseRonnie (talk) 16:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington Monument

The article Washington Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TseRonnie -- TseRonnie (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Sunday March 22: Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference

Sunday March 22: Wikipedia Day NYC 2015

You are invited to join us at Barnard College for Wikipedia Day NYC 2015, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference for the project's 14th birthday. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory unconference, with plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. Sunday March 22 Wikipedia Day NYC 2015 (RSVP on-wiki or at bit.ly/wikidaybarnard). 10:00pm - 9:00 pm at Barnard College, 3009 Broadway, by W 118th St We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

You did it!

		100,000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100,000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts.

The above since it appears no has given you that one yet, and as promised, soda and chips:

• 
• 

Congrats my friend! — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Thank you! Really enjoyed the chips. Epic Genius (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Just a question

Hi Epic Genius! :D Long time, no see! I just had a quick question about your edit on the World Trade Center article. I was just curious, why did you collapse the information box? Is it because its too long? :) Cheers! CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

@CookieMonster755: It was due to a concern on the talk page, by Orange Suede Sofa, that the infobox was too long. So, I collapsed it for easier reading. Epic Genius (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Epicgenius -- Aye, I understand, thank you! Also, what is the status on the split proposal? :) The split proposal for splitting the World Trade Center article into the 1973-2001 World Trade Center and the new (current) World Trade Center. I has been up for weeks, so I was just wondering who has the authority to close and split the article. Cheers! CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@CookieMonster755: It looks like people want to split the page. However, this article is a Good Article, so any significant changes, like a split, would have to be carefully drafted out first. Expect any split to take approximately 6 months because of the great attention given to this article. Epic Genius (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Draft:World Trade Center (1973-2001) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Buildings and structures destroyed in the September 11 attacks

I've got a bit of an issue with this category. Most of the buildings listed as "destroyed" exist. Granted, I understand we're talking about older versions of them that were destroyed, but the main focus on those articles are buildings that presently exist. The building that is 1WTC didn't exist before 9/11 at all, as it's a completely different structure from the Twin Towers, which to my surprise do not have their own article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Muboshgu: That's because many of the "destroyed" buildings were rebuilt. For example, there were two 4 WTCs and two 7 WTCs. The originals were destroyed, but the new ones exist, so the categories are true of the original towers.

The Twin Towers' article is at World Trade Center and at the 1 and 2 WTCs' articles. There is no separate article specifically for the Twin Towers, but the separate towers are described at the 1 and 2 WTCs' articles, and the towers asa whole are described as part of a whole group in the main WTC article. Epic Genius (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors, 303 to be exact, have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

. Buster Seven Talk 13:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Buster7: Thanks! (I also have another 100000 award above, by the way). Epic Genius (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

hmmmmmm! Yes, I see that. There is a serious penalty for displaying an "un-official" 100K award. I don't know what that penalty is.....but it's serious!!! As you can see by this page I am the Official Giver-Outer of the Award. While any previous award may have been given to you with the best of intentions, its kind of like a fake Rolex wristwatch. The choice is yours. You can wear the $19.95 Rolex (which is not really a Rolex and should be called something like "Roll-of-toiletpaper X") or you can wear the jeweled movement, 24 carat authentic $5327.00 Rolex. I think the choice is obvious. BTW, the other 300 or so Award recipients all have REAL Awards. So, if you 100K guys and gals ever have a convention, you better make sure you bring the Official 100K Award. Have a nice day. . Buster Seven Talk 18:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Buster7: I buy all my counterfeit stuff, including the fake 100K award, at Canal Street in New York City. I just hope that there's no penalty for me. Epic Genius (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

We have a similar "hey Buddy! Wanna buy a watch?" street here in Chicago called Maxwell Street. Long story since its no longer on Maxwell Street because the U Of Illinois stole the property "from the people" (Citizens Arise!) about 20 years ago. . Buster Seven Talk 18:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Nice. Epic Genius (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh dear, I swear the supplier I got it from said it was an authentic Buster barnstar! In all seriousness, I was wondering why Buster hadn't gotten to it yet. Too slow!! Also not to 1-up ya but I also gave out complimentary chips and soda! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: You did not tell me it was counterfeit? I am very disappointed. Epic Genius (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I just hope I didn't lose my Buster 100K award recipient privileges! It'd take me another year at least to get to that point anyway so maybe he will have forgotten by then :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Congrats! Well done you. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Congratulations on making 100,000 edits. Well done you. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@SW3 5DL: Thanks! Epic Genius (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

161st Street (Bronx)

added a link pointing to Grand Concourse

Murder of Nixzmary Brown

added a link pointing to Ruben Diaz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Compliments

As a new user, I just wanted to compliment you on the awesomeness of your page. You had me laughing pretty hard in some places. It's good to know there are some folks here with a sense of humor. Cheers! →Hubbardc→Talk to me!→ 22:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Hubbardc

@Hubbardc: Thanks for the compliments! Epic Genius (talk) 01:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

See you at Grand Central Talk

Per your revert at the above. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I will reply there. – Epic Genius (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Master Apartments

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Manhansett Quartet

I know why you would think it was a typo - but it wasn't. See also here. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ghmyrtle: I see. Thanks for the correction. I'd thought it was a typo because "Manhasset" was the name of the town. Epic Genius (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

how do i put this on my user page like u do?

How did u place this on your user page? There is no code available for how to do it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Doorknob747/tabs

Doorknob747 20:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 (talk • contribs)

@Doorknob747: Add the code {{User:Doorknob747/tabs}}. Epic Genius (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Nothing happened. Doorknob747 22:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 (talk • contribs)

@Doorknob747: Remove the "<tt><nowiki></nowiki></tt>" tags. Don't copy the source code on this page; copy what you see in the "Read" mode. Epic Genius (talk) 11:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Doorknob747 17:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 (talk • contribs)

Talkback

Hello, Epicgenius. You have new messages at Talk:The Bank of New York Mellon.
Message added 11:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CaroleHenson (talk) 11:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

"Emblem" and route "bullet"

What's wrong with some little professional writing? What does emblem mean then? They both mean the same exact thing. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

@JoesphBarbaro: "Emblem" means "an abstract or representational pictorial image". The NYC Subway circular/diamond route icons are more accurately described as "route bullets", since they are not strictly abstract representations. Epic Genius (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: I suppose you're right. Thanks. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Epicgenius,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list • Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter • Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Museum(s) of Biblical Art

A couple of months ago, you made the NY Museum of Biblical Art the Primary and the Dallas Museum of Biblical Art (Dallas) secondary. I've been wondering what your reasons were? MOBIA has a curator, but not a building or a permanent collection. Dallas has a permanent collection, a building and a curator. Can we Talk:Museum of Biblical Art ?E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I have left a reply there. Epic Genius (talk) 03:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Washington Monument

BlueMoonset (talk) 02:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC) (messages for this DYK originally posted by Coffee at 00:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC))

@BlueMoonset: Thank you very much. I'm surprised that the credit is still applicable, but thank you anyway. Epic Genius (talk) 02:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement

• Hello Epicgenius:

Please consider participating in this week's vote for TAFI's upcoming Week 17 collaboration. Last week's voting did not receive many participants. Thanks for your consideration. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)