Talk:Mariological papal documents

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Mariological papal documents is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Untitled

I started this article primarily as a List of All Items style article, then added some text to each item for clarification. It is not intended to be a discussion of papal Mariology, but a central list of official Vatican Marian documents, which I could not find elsewhere in Wikipedia. History2007 (talk) 04:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

This article was the subject of a merge proposal, with marge tags placed on 20 November 2010, but concluded as "Do not merge", as discussed on Talk:Mariology of the popes. History2007 (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mariological papal documents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140530003451/http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/rosarymarkings29.html to http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/rosarymarkings29.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Format

I have started to list the documents in chronological order. The reason is (1) I think it better aids in following the development of thought over time; and (2) later documents frequently reference an earlier one, and someone might wish to trace them in order. The particular type is noted for each as to its relative importance, but may be less helpful in seeing what concepts were viewed as important at a particular time, and how the theological ideas developed. If anybody is bothered by this, feel free to revert. Mannanan51 (talk) 05:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]