Jump to content

Native American genocide in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 45.53.123.118 (talk) at 22:09, 5 February 2024 (See also). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Native American genocide in the United States
1919 illustration of a U.S. cavalry attack on a village
LocationUnited States
TargetNative Americans
Attack type
Massacres, forced displacement, ethnic cleansing, collective punishment, starvation, others
Deaths
  • Decrease 96% population drop[a]
Victims
  • 98% loss of ancestral homelands[3]
MotiveSettler colonialism
AccusedUnited States

Native American genocide in the United States refers to the characterization of the substantial population decline of American Indians as a form of genocide. The question of whether the significant population decline constitutes genocide is debated amongst scholars. Debates are ongoing over whether the entire process, or specific periods and local occurrences, meet the legal definition of genocide. Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term "genocide," considered the colonial displacement of Native Americans by English and later British settlers as a historical example of genocide.[4] However, others, like historian Gary Anderson, contend that genocide does not accurately characterize any aspect of American history, suggesting instead that ethnic cleansing is a more appropriate term.[5]

Estimating the pre-European population of the Americas remains a topic of ongoing research without a consensus.[6][7] Current estimates range from 2.1 million to 18 million people residing on the North American continent before European colonization.[8][9] By 1800 some 600,000 Native Americans lived in the regions that would become the modern United States; by 1890 this number had declined to an estimated 250,000 before rebounding.[10]

The population decline among Native Americans in the 19th century can be attributed to various factors, including Eurasian diseases like influenza, pneumonic plagues, and smallpox. Additionally, conflicts, massacres, forced removal, enslavement, imprisonment, and warfare with European settlers contributed to the reduction in populations and the disruption of traditional societies.[11][12][13][14] Historian Jeffrey Ostler emphasizes the importance of considering the so-called American Indian Wars, campaigns by the U.S. Army to subdue Native American nations in the American West starting in the 1860s, as genocide.[15] Scholars increasingly refer to these events as massacres or "genocidal massacres," defined as the annihilation of a portion of a larger group, sometimes intended to send a message to the larger group.[15]

Background

Chaco Canyon and the Pueblo Bonito (center), c. 828 BCE to c. 1126 CE, depicted in a 2007 NASA reconstruction
Illustration of Cahokia, the largest Mississippian culture city ruin, c. 1050 CE to c. 1350 CE
The Kincaid site in Massac County, Illinois, c. 1050 CE to c. 1400 CE

Population estimates for the pre-Columbian U.S. territory generally range from between 1 and 5 million people. Prominent cultures in the historical period before colonization included: Adena, Old Copper, Oasisamerica, Woodland, Fort Ancient, Hopewell tradition and Mississippian cultures.[16]

In the classification of the archaeology of the Americas, the post-Classic stage is a term applied to some Precolumbian cultures, typically ending with local contact with Europeans. This stage is the fifth of five archaeological stages posited by Gordon Willey and Philip Phillips' 1958 book Method and Theory in American Archaeology.[17] In the North American chronology, the "post-classic stage" followed the classic stage in certain areas, and typically dates from around AD 1200 to modern times.[18]

The Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast were of many nations and tribal affiliations, each with distinctive cultural and political identities, but they shared certain beliefs, traditions, and practices, such as the centrality of salmon as a resource and spiritual symbol. Their gift-giving feast, potlatch, is a highly complex event where people gather to commemorate special events. These events include the raising of a totem pole or the appointment or election of a new chief. The most famous artistic feature of the culture is the totem pole, with carvings of animals and other characters to commemorate cultural beliefs, legends, and notable events.

The Mississippian culture was a mound-building Native American civilization archaeologists date from approximately 800 CE to 1600 CE, varying regionally.[19] It was composed of a series of urban settlements and satellite villages (suburbs) linked together by a loose trading network,[20] the largest city being Cahokia, believed to be a major religious center. The civilization flourished in what is now the Midwestern, Eastern, and Southeastern United States.[21][22]

Numerous pre-Columbian societies were urbanized, such as the Pueblo peoples, Mandan, and Hidatsa. The Iroquois League of Nations or "People of the Long House" was a politically advanced, democratic society, which is thought by some historians to have influenced the United States Constitution,[23][24] with the Senate passing a resolution to this effect in 1988.[25] Other historians have contested this interpretation and believe the impact was minimal, or did not exist, pointing to numerous differences between the two systems and the ample precedents for the constitution in European political thought.[26][27][28]

Colonial massacres

Attempted extermination of the Pequot

A 1743 copy of the Treaty of Hartford of 1638, through which English colonists sought to eradicate the Pequot cultural identity by prohibiting Pequot survivors of the war from returning to their lands, speaking their tribal language, or referring to themselves as Pequots.[29]

The Pequot War was an armed conflict that took place between 1636 and 1638 in New England between the Pequot tribe and an alliance of the colonists of the Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, and Saybrook colonies and their allies from the Narragansett and Mohegan tribes.

The war concluded with the decisive defeat of the Pequots. The colonies of Connecticut and Massachusetts offered bounties for the heads of killed hostile Indians, and later for just their scalps, during the Pequot War in the 1630s;[30] Connecticut specifically reimbursed Mohegans for slaying the Pequot in 1637.[31] At the end, about 700 Pequots had been killed or taken into captivity.[32]

The English colonists imposed a harshly punitive treaty on the estimated 2,500 Pequots who survived the war; the Treaty of Hartford of 1638 sought to eradicate the Pequot cultural identity—with terms prohibiting the Pequots from returning to their lands, speaking their tribal language, or even referring to themselves as Pequots—and effectively dissolved the Pequot Nation, with many survivors executed or enslaved and sold away.[29] Hundreds of prisoners were sold into slavery to the West Indies;[33] other survivors were dispersed as captives to the victorious tribes. The result was the elimination of the Pequot tribe as a viable polity in Southern New England, the colonial authorities classifying them as extinct. However, members of the Pequot tribe still live today as a federally recognized tribe.[34]

Massacre of the Narragansett people

The Great Swamp Massacre was committed during King Philip's War by colonial militia of New England on the Narragansett tribe in December 1675. On December 15 of that year, Narraganset warriors attacked the Jireh Bull Blockhouse and killed at least 15 people. Four days later, the militias from the English colonies of Plymouth, Connecticut, and Massachusetts Bay were led to the main Narragansett town in South Kingstown, Rhode Island. The settlement was burned, its inhabitants (including women and children) killed or evicted, and most of the tribe's winter stores destroyed. It is believed that at least 97 Narragansett warriors and 300 to 1,000 non-combatants were killed, though exact figures are unknown.[35] The massacre was a critical blow to the Narragansett tribe during the period directly following the massacre.[36] However, much like the Pequot, the Narragansett people continue to live today as a federally recognized tribe.[37]

French and Indian War and Pontiac's War

19th century engraving of the Gnadenhutten massacre

On June 12, 1755, during the French and Indian War, Massachusetts governor William Shirley issued a bounty of £40 for a male Indian scalp, and £20 for scalps of Indian females or of children under 12 years old.[38][39] In 1756, Pennsylvania lieutenant-governor Robert Hunter Morris, in his declaration of war against the Lenni Lenape (Delaware) people, offered "130 Pieces of Eight, for the Scalp of Every Male Indian Enemy, above the Age of Twelve Years", and "50 Pieces of Eight for the Scalp of Every Indian Woman, produced as evidence of their being killed."[38][40] During Pontiac's War, Colonel Henry Bouquet conspired with his superior, Sir Jeffrey Amherst, to infect hostile Native Americans through biological warfare with smallpox blankets.[41]

Ethnic cleansing

Manifest destiny

Early Native American tribal territories color-coded by linguistic group
Graphic depicting Native land loss

Manifest destiny had serious consequences for Native Americans, since continental expansion implicitly meant the occupation and annexation of Native American land, sometimes to expand slavery. This ultimately led to confrontations and wars with several groups of native peoples via Indian removal.[42][43][44][45] The United States continued the European practice of recognizing only limited land rights of Indigenous peoples. In a policy formulated largely by Henry Knox, Secretary of War in the Washington administration, the U.S. government sought to expand into the west through the purchase of Native American land in treaties.

Only the federal government could purchase Indian lands, and this was done through treaties with tribal leaders. Whether a tribe actually had a decision-making structure capable of making a treaty was a controversial issue. The national policy was for the Indians to join American society and become "civilized", which meant no more wars with neighboring tribes or raids on white settlers or travelers, and a shift from hunting to farming and ranching. Advocates of civilization programs believed that the process of settling native tribes would greatly reduce the amount of land needed by the Native Americans, making more land available for homesteading by white Americans. Thomas Jefferson believed that the Indigenous people of America had to assimilate and live like the whites or inevitably be pushed aside by them.[46][47] Once Jefferson believed that assimilation was no longer possible, he advocated for the extermination or displacement of Indigenous people.[48] Following the forced removal of many Indigenous peoples, Americans increasingly believed that Native American ways of life would eventually disappear as the United States expanded.[49] Humanitarian advocates of removal believed that American Indians would be better off moving away from whites.

As historian Reginald Horsman argued in his influential study Race and Manifest Destiny, racial rhetoric increased during the era of manifest destiny. Americans increasingly believed that Native American ways of life would "fade away" as the United States expanded. As an example, this idea was reflected in the work of one of America's first great historians, Francis Parkman, whose landmark book The Conspiracy of Pontiac was published in 1851.[50] Parkman wrote that after the French defeat in the French and Indian War, Indians were "destined to melt and vanish before the advancing waves of Anglo-American power, which now rolled westward unchecked and unopposed". Parkman emphasized that the collapse of Indian power in the late 18th century had been swift and was a past event.[51]

Trail of Tears

Graphic depicting Trail of Tears

The Trail of Tears was an ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of approximately 60,000 people of the "Five Civilized Tribes" between 1830 and 1850 by the United States government.[52] As part of the Indian removal, members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations were forcibly removed from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States to newly designated Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River after the passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830.[53][52][54] The Cherokee removal in 1838 (the last forced removal east of the Mississippi) was brought on by the discovery of gold near Dahlonega, Georgia, in 1828, resulting in the Georgia Gold Rush.[55] The relocated peoples suffered from exposure, disease, and starvation while en route to their newly designated Indian reserve. Thousands died from disease before reaching their destinations or shortly after.[56] Some historians have said that the event constituted a genocide, although this label remains a matter of debate.[57][58][59]

Chalk and Jonassohn assert that the deportation of the Cherokee tribe along the Trail of Tears would almost certainly be considered an act of genocide today.[60] The Indian Removal Act of 1830 led to the exodus. About 17,000 Cherokees, along with approximately 2,000 Cherokee-owned black slaves, were removed from their homes.[61] Historians such as David Stannard[62] and Barbara Mann[63] have noted that the army deliberately routed the march of the Cherokee to pass through areas of a known cholera epidemic, such as Vicksburg. Stannard estimates that during the forced removal from their homelands, following the Indian Removal Act signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, 8,000 Cherokee died, about half the total population.[64]

Long Walk

A U.S. soldier stands guard over Navajo people during the Long Walk.

The Long Walk of the Navajo, also called the Long Walk to Bosque Redondo (Template:Lang-nv), was the 1864 deportation and ethnic cleansing[65][66] of the Navajo people by the United States federal government. Navajos were forced to walk from their land in western New Mexico Territory (modern-day Arizona) to Bosque Redondo in eastern New Mexico. Some 53 different forced marches occurred between August 1864 and the end of 1866. Some anthropologists claim that the "collective trauma of the Long Walk...is critical to contemporary Navajos' sense of identity as a people".[67][68]

Yavapai Exodus Day

In 1886, many of the Yavapai ethnic group joined in campaigns by the US Army, as scouts, against Geronimo and other Chiricahua Apache.[69] The wars ended with the Yavapai's and the Tonto's removal from the Camp Verde Reservation to San Carlos on February 27, 1875, now known as Exodus Day.[70][71][72] 1,400 where relocated in these travels and over the course the relocation the Yavapai received no wagons or rest stops.[73] Yavapai were beaten with whips through rivers of melted snow in which many drowned,[73] any Yavapai who lagged behind was left behind or shot.[73] The march lead to 375 deaths.[73]

Reservation system

Reservations in the Continental United States

Indian removal policies led to the current day reservation system which allocated territories to individual tribes. According to scholar Dina Gilio-Whitaker, "the treaties also created reservations that would confine Native people into smaller territories far smaller than they had for millenia been accustomed to, diminishing their ability to feed themselves."[74] According to author and scholar David Rich Lewis, these reservations had much higher population densities than indigenous homelands. As a result, "the consolidation of native peoples in the 19th century allowed epidemic diseases to rage through their communities."[75] In addition to this "a result of changing subsistence patterns and environments-contributed to an explosion of dietary-related illness like diabetes, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, cirrhosis, obesity, gallbladder disease, hypertension, and heart disease."[75]

Once their territories were incorporated into the United States, surviving Native Americans were denied equality before the law and often treated as wards of the state.[76][77] Many Native Americans were moved to reservations—constituting 4% of U.S. territory. In a number of cases, treaties signed with Native Americans were violated. Tens of thousands of American Indians and Alaska Natives were forced to attend a residential school system which sought to reeducate them in white-settler American values, culture, and economy.[78][79][80]

Genocidal campaigns

Stacie Martin states that the United States has not been legally admonished by the international community for genocidal acts against its Indigenous population, but many historians and academics describe events such as the Mystic massacre, the Trail of Tears, the Sand Creek massacre and the Mendocino War as genocidal in nature.[81]

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz states that U.S. history, as well as inherited Indigenous trauma, cannot be understood without dealing with the genocide that the United States committed against Indigenous peoples. From the colonial period through the founding of the United States and continuing in the twentieth century, this has entailed torture, terror, sexual abuse, massacres, systematic military occupations, removals of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral territories via Indian removal policies, forced removal of Native American children to boarding schools, allotment, and a policy of termination.[82]

The letters exchanged between Bouquet and Amherst during the Pontiac War show Amherst writing to Bouquet that the indigenous people needed to be exterminated: "You will do well to try to inoculate the Indians by means of blankets, as well as to try every other method that can serve to extirpate this execrable race." Historians regard this as evidence of a genocidal intent by Amherst, as well as part of a broader genocidal attitude frequently displayed against Native Americans during the colonization of the Americas.[83] When smallpox swept the northern plains of the U.S. in 1837, the U.S. Secretary of War Lewis Cass ordered that no Mandan (along with the Arikara, the Cree, and the Blackfeet) be given smallpox vaccinations, which were provided to other tribes in other areas.[84][85][86]

Historian Jeffrey Ostler describes the Colorado territorial militia's slaughter of Cheyennes at Sand Creek (1864) and the army's slaughter of Shoshones at Bear River (1863), Blackfeet on the Marias River (1870), and Lakotas at Wounded Knee (1890) as "genocidal massacres."[15]

California

Population transfer of the Cupeño.

The U.S. colonization of California started in earnest in 1845, with the Mexican–American War. With the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, it gave the United States authority over 525,000 square miles of new territory. In addition to the Gold Rush slaughter, there was also a large number of state-subsidized massacres by colonists against Native Americans in the territory, causing several entire ethnic groups to be wiped out. In one such series of conflicts, the so-called Mendocino War and the subsequent Round Valley War, the entirety of the Yuki people was brought to the brink of extinction. From a previous population of some 3,500 people, fewer than 100 members of the Yuki tribe were left. According to Russell Thornton, estimates of the pre-Columbian population of California may have been as high as 300,000.

By 1849, due to a number of epidemics, the number had decreased to 150,000. But from 1849 and up until 1890 the indigenous population of California had fallen below 20,000, primarily because of the killings.[87] At least 4,500 California Indians were killed between 1849 and 1870, while many more perished due to disease and starvation.[88] 10,000 Indians were also kidnapped and sold as slaves.[89] In a speech before representatives of Native American peoples in June 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom apologized for the genocide. Newsom said, "That's what it was, a genocide. No other way to describe it. And that's the way it needs to be described in the history books."[90]

Whites hunted down adult Indians in the mountains, kidnapped their children, and sold them as apprentices for as little as $50. Indians could not complain in court because of another California statute that stated that 'no Indian or Black or Mulatto person was permitted to give evidence in favor of or against a white person'. One contemporary wrote, "The miners are sometimes guilty of the most brutal acts with the Indians... such incidents have fallen under my notice that would make humanity weep and men disown their race".[91] The towns of Marysville and Honey Lake paid bounties for Indian scalps. Shasta City offered $5 for every Indian head brought to City Hall; California's State Treasury reimbursed many of the local governments for their expenses.

American Indian wars

A mass grave being dug for frozen bodies from the 1890 Wounded Knee massacre, in which the U.S. Army killed 150 Lakota people, marking the end of the American Indian Wars

During the Indian Wars, the American Army carried out a number of massacres and forced relocations of Indigenous peoples that are sometimes considered genocide.[92] Jeffrey Ostler, the Beekman Professor of Northwest and Pacific History at the University of Oregon, stated the American Indian War "was genocidal war."[93] Xabier Irujo, professor of genocide studies at the University of Nevada, Reno, stated, "the toll on human lives in the wars against the native nations between 1848 and 1881 was horrific."[94] Notable conflicts in this period include the Dakota War, Great Sioux War, Snake War and Colorado War. These conflicts occurred in the United States from the time of the earliest colonial settlements in the 17th century until the end of the 19th century. The wars resulted from several factors, the most common being the desire of settlers and governments for Indian tribes' lands.

The 1864 Sand Creek massacre, which caused outrage in its own time, has been regarded as a genocide. Colonel John Chivington led a 700-man force of Colorado Territory militia in a massacre of 70–163 peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho, about two-thirds of whom were women, children, and infants. Chivington and his men took scalps and other body parts as trophies, including human fetuses and male and female genitalia.[95] Chivington stated, "Damn any man who sympathizes with Indians! ... I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God's heaven to kill Indians. ... Kill and scalp all, big and little; nits make lice."[96]

Cultural genocide

Pupils at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, Pennsylvania (c. 1900).

In reference to colonialism in the United States, Raphael Lemkin stated that the "colonial enslavement of American Indians was a cultural genocide."[97] He also stated that colonialism in the United States comprised an "effective and thorough method of destroying a culture and de-socializing human beings." Lemkin drew a distinction between "cultural change and cultural genocide."[97] He defined the former as a slow and gradual process of transition to new situations, and he saw the latter as the result of a radical and violent change that necessitated "the pre-meditated goal of those committing cultural genocide." Lemkin believed that cultural genocide occurs only when there are "surgical operations on cultures and deliberate assassinations of civilizations."[97]

According to Vincent Schilling, many people are aware of historical atrocities that were committed against his people, but there is an "extensive amount of misunderstanding about Native American and First Nations people's history." He added that Native Americans have also suffered a "cultural genocide" because of colonization's residual effects.[98]

The American-Indian experience in North America is defined as comprising physical and cultural disintegration. That fact becomes clear when one examines how law and colonialism were used as tools of genocide, both physically and culturally.[97] According to Luana Ross the assumption that law (a Euro-American construct) and its administration are prejudiced against particular groups of individuals is critical for understanding Native American criminality and the experiences of Natives imprisoned.[99] For instance, in Georgia, the 1789 act permitted indiscriminate massacre of Creek Indians by proclaiming them to be outside the state's protection. Apart from physical annihilation, the State promoted acculturation by introducing legislation limiting land entitlements to Indians who had abandoned tribal citizenship.[97]

Throughout the writing of the Genocide Convention, the United States was adamantly opposed to the addition of cultural genocide, even threatening to block the treaty's approval if cultural genocide was included in the final text.[100]

Forced assimilation

Young woman and young man standing at a church altar with a priest

The Native American boarding school system was a 150-year program and federal policy that separated Indigenous children from their families and sought to assimilate them into white society. It began in the early 19th century, coinciding with the start of Indian Removal policies.[101] A Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative Investigative Report was published on May 11, 2022, which officially acknowledged the federal government's role in creating and perpetuating this system.[102] According to the report, the U.S. federal government operated or funded more than 408 boarding institutions in 37 states between 1819 and 1969. 431 boarding schools were identified in total, many of which were run by religious institutions.[102]

The report described the system as part of a federal policy aimed at eradicating the identity of Indigenous communities and confiscating their lands. Abuse was widespread at the schools, as was overcrowding, malnutrition, disease and lack of adequate healthcare.[103][102] The report documented over 500 child deaths at 19 schools, although it is estimated the total number could rise to thousands, and possibly even tens of thousands.[101] Marked or unmarked burial sites were discovered at 53 schools.[103] The school system has been described as a cultural genocide and a racist dehumanization.[102]

Femicide

Missing and murdered

Woman protesting for MMIW in Rochester, Minnesota.

In the United States, Native American women are more than twice as likely to experience violence than any other demographic.[104][105] One in three Indigenous women is sexually assaulted during her life, and 67% of these assaults are perpetrated by non-Native perpetrators.[106][107][108][109][110][b] According to research from the National Institute of Justice, it was found that American Indian women are 1.2 times as likely to experience lifetime violence, 1.8 times as likely to be a victim of stalking, and 1.7 times as likely to be victims of violence in the past year compared to the Non-Hispanic White population.[105] Lisa Brunner, executive director of Sacred Spirits First National Coalition states, "What's happened through US Federal law and policy is they created lands of impunity where this is like a playground for serial rapists, batterers, killers, whoever and our children aren't protected at all."[112]

Sterilization

The Family Planning Services and Population Research Act was passed in 1970, which subsidized sterilizations for patients receiving healthcare through the Indian Health Service. In the six years after the act was passed, an estimated 25% of childbearing-aged Native American women were sterilized. Some of the procedures were performed under coercion, or without understanding by those sterilized.[113] In 1977, Marie Sanchez, chief tribal judge of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation told the United Nations Convention on Indigenous Rights in Geneva, that Native American women suffered involuntary sterilization which she equated with modern genocide.[113]

Memory and legacy

The United States has to date not undertaken any truth commission nor built a memorial for the genocide of Indigenous people.[114] It does not acknowledge nor compensate for the historical violence against Native Americans that occurred during territorial expansion to the West Coast.[114] American museums such as the Smithsonian Institution do not dedicate a section to the genocide.[114] In 2013, the National Congress of American Indians passed a resolution to create a space for the National American Indian Holocaust Museum inside the Smithsonian, but it was ignored by the latter.[114]

Historiography

American historian Ned Blackhawk said that nationalist historiographies have been forms of denial that erase the history of destruction of European colonial expansion. Blackhawk said that near consensus has emerged that genocide against some Indigenous peoples took place in North America following colonization.[115]

In An American Genocide, Benjamin Madley argues that Indigenous resistance to genocidal campaigns has resulted in these campaigns as being inaccurately described as war or battles, instead of genocidal massacres.[116]

David Moshman, a professor at University of Nebraska–Lincoln, highlighted the lack of awareness of the American public, stating, "The nations of the Americas remain virtually oblivious to their emergence from a series of genocides that were deliberately aimed at, and succeeded in eliminating, hundreds of Indigenous cultures."[117]

See also

References

  1. ^ Michael Smith, David. "Counting the Dead: Estimating the Loss of Life in the Indigenous Holocaust, 1492–Present" (PDF). Southeast Oklahoma State University. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  2. ^ "The American Genocide of the Indians—Historical Facts and Real Evidence". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  3. ^ "Indigenous peoples: loss of land to the United States". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  4. ^ McDonnell, M. A.; Moses, A. D. (2005). "Raphael Lemkin as historian of genocide in the Americas". Journal of Genocide Research. 7 (4): 501–529. doi:10.1080/14623520500349951. S2CID 72663247.
  5. ^ Sousa, Ashley (2016). "Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian: The Crime That Should Haunt America by Gary Clayton Anderson". Journal of Southern History. 82 (1): 135–136. doi:10.1353/soh.2016.0023. ISSN 2325-6893. S2CID 159731284.
  6. ^ Snow, Dean R. (June 16, 1995). "Microchronology and Demographic Evidence Relating to the Size of Pre-Columbian North American Indian Populations". Science. 268 (5217): 1601–1604. doi:10.1126/science.268.5217.1601.
  7. ^ Shoemaker, Nancy (2000). American Indian Population Recovery in the Twentieth Century. University of New Mexico Press. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-0-8263-2289-0.
  8. ^ Thornton, Russell (1990). American Indian holocaust and survival: a population history since 1492. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 26–32. ISBN 978-0-8061-2220-5.
  9. ^ Lord, Lewis (1997). "How Many People Were Here Before Columbus?" (PDF). U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on January 22, 2019. Retrieved May 7, 2016.
  10. ^ Thornton, Russel (1990). American Indian holocaust and survival: a population history since 1492. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-8061-2220-5.
  11. ^ Ostler, Jeffrey (April 29, 2020). "Disease Has Never Been Just Disease for Native Americans". The Atlantic. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
  12. ^ Reséndez, Andrés (2016). The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-547-64098-3.
  13. ^ Ostler, Jeffrey (2019). Surviving genocide : native nations and the United States from the American Revolution to bleeding Kansas. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-24526-4. OCLC 1099434736.
  14. ^ Gilio-Whitaker, Dina (2019). As long as grass grows : the indigenous fight for environmental justice, from colonization to Standing Rock. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-8070-7378-0. OCLC 1044542033.
  15. ^ a b c Ostler, Jeffrey (March 2, 2015). "Genocide and American Indian History". American History. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.3. ISBN 978-0-19-932917-5.
  16. ^ Murphy, Robert F. (2002). American Anthropology, 1946–1970: Papers from the American Anthropologist. U of Nebraska Press. pp. 174–. ISBN 978-0-8032-8280-3.
  17. ^ Willey, Gordon R. (1989). "Gordon Willey". In Glyn Edmund Daniel; Christopher Chippindale (eds.). The Pastmasters: Eleven Modern Pioneers of Archaeology: V. Gordon Childe, Stuart Piggott, Charles Phillips, Christopher Hawkes, Seton Lloyd, Robert J. Braidwood, Gordon R. Willey, C.J. Becker, Sigfried J. De Laet, J. Desmond Clark, D.J. Mulvaney. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05051-1. OCLC 19750309.
  18. ^ "Method and Theory in American Archaeology". Gordon Willey and Philip Phillips. University of Chicago. 1958. Archived from the original on June 28, 2012.[ISBN missing]
  19. ^ Adam King, "Mississippian Period: Overview" Archived March 1, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, New Georgia Encyclopedia, 2002, accessed November 15, 2009
  20. ^ "WashingtonPost.com: Ancient Cahokia". Washington Post.
  21. ^ King, Adam (2002). "Mississippian Period: Overview". New Georgia Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on March 1, 2012. Retrieved November 15, 2009.
  22. ^ Blitz, John H. "Mississippian Period". Encyclopedia of Alabama. Alabama Humanities Foundation.
  23. ^ Daly, Janet L. (1997). "The Effect of the Iroquois Constitution on the United States Constitution". IPOAA Magazine. Archived from the original on July 2, 2017.
  24. ^ Woods, Thomas E. (2007). 33 Questions about American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. Crown Forum. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-307-34668-1.
  25. ^ "H. Con. Res. 331" (PDF). United States Senate. October 21, 1988.
  26. ^ Shannon, Timothy J. (2002). Indians and Colonists at the Crossroads of Empire: The Albany Congress of 1754. Cornell University Press. pp. 6–8. ISBN 978-0-8014-8818-4.
  27. ^ Clifton, James A., ed. (1990). "The United States Constitution and the Iroquois League". Invented indian. Transaction Publishers. pp. 107–128. ISBN 978-1-4128-2659-4.
  28. ^ Rakove, Jack (July 21, 2005). "Did the Founding Fathers Really Get Many of Their Ideas of Liberty from the Iroquois?". History News Network. Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, George Mason University.
  29. ^ a b Piecuch, Jim. "Hartford, Treaty of." The Encyclopedia of North American Colonial Conflicts to 1775: A Political, Social, and Military History, edited by Spencer C. Tucker, et al., vol. 1, ABC-CLIO, 2008, p. 375. Gale eBooks. Accessed August 17, 2023.
  30. ^ Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne (2014). An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. Beacon Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-8070-0040-3.
  31. ^ Tucker, Spencer C. (2011). The Encyclopedia of North American Indian Wars, 1607–1890. ABC-CLIO, LLC. p. 708. ISBN 978-1851096978.
  32. ^ John Winthrop, Journal of John Winthrop. ed. Dunn, Savage, Yeandle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), 228.
  33. ^ Lion Gardiner, "Relation of the Pequot Warres", in History of the Pequot War: The Contemporary Accounts of Mason, Underhill, Vincent, and Gardiner (Cleveland, 1897), p. 138; Ethel Boissevain, "Whatever Became of the New England Indians Shipped to Bermuda to be Sold as Slaves," Man in the Northwest 11 (Spring 1981), pp. 103–114; Karen O. Kupperman, Providence Island, 1630–1641: The Other Puritan Colony (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), p. 172
  34. ^ Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. "Tribal History". The Mashantucket (Western) Pequot Tribal Nation. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  35. ^ Gott, Richard (2004). Cuba: A new history. Yale University Press. p. 32.
  36. ^ Leach, Douglas Edward (1958). Flintlock and Tomahawk: New England in King Philip's War. New York: MacMillan. pp. 130–132.
  37. ^ Tribe, Narragansett. "Narragansett History". Narragansett Indian Nation Website. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  38. ^ a b "Scalping, Torture, and Mutilation by Indians". Blue Corn Comics. Archived from the original on August 31, 2016. Retrieved July 28, 2016.
  39. ^ Sonneborn, Liz (May 14, 2014). Chronology of American Indian History. Infobase. p. 88. ISBN 9781438109848. Archived from the original on May 2, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2016.
  40. ^ "Declaration of War". simpson.edu. February 7, 2014. Archived from the original on February 7, 2014.
  41. ^ Calloway, Collin G. (2007). The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America (Pivotal Moments in American History). Oxford University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0195331271.
  42. ^ Greenwood, Robert E. (2007). Outsourcing Culture: How American Culture has Changed From "We the People" Into a One World Government. Outskirts Press. p. 97.
  43. ^ Molhotra, Rajiv (2009). "American Exceptionalism and the Myth of the American Frontiers". In Rajani Kannepalli Kanth (ed.). The Challenge of Eurocentrism. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 180, 184, 189, 199.
  44. ^ Finkelman, Paul; Kennon, Donald R. (2008). Congress and the Emergence of Sectionalism. Ohio University Press. pp. 15, 141, 254.
  45. ^ Kiernan, Ben (2007). Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur. Yale University Press. pp. 328, 330.
  46. ^ American Indians. Thomas Jefferson's Monticello. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  47. ^ Prucha 1995, p. 137, "I believe the Indian then to be in body and mind equal to the white man," (Jefferson letter to the Marquis de Chastellux, June 7, 1785).
  48. ^ "Founders Online: Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 6 December 1813". founders.archives.gov. Retrieved April 10, 2022. [T]he cruel massacres they have committed on the women and children of our frontiers taken by surprise, will oblige us now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach.
  49. ^ O'Brien, Jean M. (May 31, 2010), "Firsting", Firsting and Lasting, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–54, doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816665778.003.0001, ISBN 978-0816665778, retrieved June 10, 2022
  50. ^ Parkman, Francis (1851). "The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian War after the Conquest of Canada". Gutenberg.
  51. ^ Parkman, Francis (1913) [1851]. The conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian war after the conquest of Canada. p. 9.
  52. ^ a b Minges, Patrick (1998). "Beneath the Underdog: Race, Religion, and the Trail of Tears". US Data Repository. Archived from the original on October 11, 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2013.
  53. ^ "Indian removal". PBS. Archived from the original on April 18, 2010. Retrieved October 17, 2017.
  54. ^ Roberts, Alaina E. (2021). I've Been Here All The While: Black Freedom on Native Land. University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated. pp. 14–15. ISBN 9780812253030.
  55. ^ Inskeep, Steve (2015). Jacksonland: President Jackson, Cherokee Chief John Ross, and a Great American Land Grab. New York: Penguin Press. pp. 332–333. ISBN 978-1-59420-556-9.
  56. ^
  57. ^ Jochum, Glenn (2017). "Kelton Lecture Describes Debate Over Genocide of Indigenous Peoples". Stony Brook University News. Retrieved December 8, 2022.
  58. ^ Anderson, Gary Clayton (2014). Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian: The Crime That Should Haunt America. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 3–22. ISBN 978-0-8061-4508-2.
  59. ^ Ostler, Jeffrey (2019). Surviving Genocide: Native Nations and the United States from the American Revolution to Bleeding Kansas. Yale University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvgc629z. ISBN 978-0-300-21812-1. JSTOR j.ctvgc629z. S2CID 166826195.
  60. ^ Grenke, Arthur (2005). God, Greed, and Genocide: The Holocaust Through the Centuries. Washington, D.C.: New Academia Publishing. p. 161.
  61. ^ Carter (III), Samuel (1976). Cherokee sunset: A nation betrayed: a narrative of travail and triumph, persecution and exile. New York: Doubleday. p. 232.
  62. ^ Stannard, David E. (1993). American Holocaust: Columbus and the Conquest of the New World. New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 823595792.
  63. ^ Mann, Barbara Alice (2009). The Tainted Gift: The Disease Method of Frontier Expansion. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. ISBN 978-0-313-35338-3.
  64. ^ Stannard 1993, p. 124
  65. ^ Anderson, Gary C. Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian: The Crime that Should Haunt America. The University of Oklahoma Press. Oklahoma City, 2014.
  66. ^ Lee, Lloyd ed. Navajo Sovereignty. Understandings and visions of the Diné People. University of Arizona Press: Tucson, 2017.
  67. ^ Csordas, Thomas J. (February 1999). "Ritual Healing and the Politics of Identity in Contemporary Navajo Society". American Ethnologist. 26 (1). Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Anthropological Association: 3–23. doi:10.1525/ae.1999.26.1.3. JSTOR 647496.
  68. ^ Burnett, John (June 14, 2005). "The Navajo Nation's Own 'Trail Of Tears'". NPR, All Things Considered. Retrieved July 30, 2012.
  69. ^ Braatz, p. 3
  70. ^ Braatz, p. 88
  71. ^ Cite error: The named reference auto1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  72. ^ Hitt, Jack (August 21, 2005). "The Newest Indians". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015.
  73. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference mannbook was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  74. ^ Gilio-Whitaker, Dina (2019). As long as grass grows: the indigenous fight for environmental justice, from colonization to Standing Rock. Boston, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-8070-7378-0. OCLC 1044542033.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  75. ^ a b Lewis, David Rich (Summer 1995). "Native Americans and the Environment: A Survey of Twentieth-Century Issues". American Indian Quarterly. 19 (3): 423–450. doi:10.2307/1185599. JSTOR 1185599.
  76. ^ Anderson, Terry; Purnell, Wendy. "The Bonds Of Colonialism". Hoover Institution. Stanford University. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
  77. ^ McCoy, Matthew G. (Summer 2016). "Hidden Citizens: The Courts and Native American Voting Rights in the Southwest". Journal of the Southwest. 58 (2): 293–310. doi:10.1353/jsw.2016.0010. JSTOR 26310242. S2CID 113822477. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
  78. ^ Mary Annette Pember, "Death by Civilization Archived June 29, 2022, at the Wayback Machine", March 8, 2019, The Atlantic, Retrieved April 12, 2021
  79. ^ Adams, David Wallace (October 30, 1995). Education for Extinction: American Indians and the Boarding School Experience, 1875-1928. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0700608386. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
  80. ^ Strasser, Franz; Carpenter, Sharon (November 22, 2010). "Native Americans battle teenage suicide". BBC News.
  81. ^ Martin 2004, pp. 740–46.
  82. ^ Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne (May 12, 2016). "Yes, Native Americans Were the Victims of Genocide". History News Network. Archived from the original on November 3, 2017.
  83. ^
  84. ^ Kotar, S.L.; Gessler, J.E. (2013). Smallpox: A History. McFarland. p. 111. ISBN 9780786493272.
  85. ^ Washburn, Kevin K. (February 2006). "American Indians, Crime, and the Law". Michigan Law Review. 104: 709, 735.
  86. ^ Valencia-Weber, Gloria (January 2003). "The Supreme Court's Indian Law Decisions: Deviations from Constitutional Principles and the Crafting of Judicial Smallpox Blankets". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 5: 405, 408–09.
  87. ^ Thornton, Russell (1990). American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History since 1492. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 107–109.
  88. ^ "Minorities During the Gold Rush". California Secretary of State. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014.
  89. ^ Pritzker, Barry (2000). A Native American Encyclopedia: History, Culture, and Peoples. Oxford University Press. p. 114.
  90. ^ Cowan, Jill (June 19, 2019). "'It's Called Genocide': Newsom Apologizes to the State's Native Americans". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  91. ^ "William Swain Letter – Written from "The Diggings" in California". New Perspectives on the West. PBS. Archived from the original on March 14, 2018.
  92. ^ Thornton, Russell (1990). American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since 1492. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0806122205.
  93. ^ "Historian Examines Native American Genoci→de, its Legacy, and Survivors". University of Oregon. January 20, 2021. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
  94. ^ Irujo, Xabier. "Genocide, kill the Indian and save the man". Nevada Today. University of Nevada, Reno. Retrieved November 19, 2023.
  95. ^ United States Congress Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, 1865 (testimonies and report)
  96. ^ Brown, Dee (2001) [1970]. "War Comes to the Cheyenne". Bury my heart at Wounded Knee. Macmillan. pp. 86–87. ISBN 978-0-8050-6634-0.
  97. ^ a b c d e Mako, Shamiran (June 18, 2012). "Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 19 (2). Social Science Research Network: 175–194. doi:10.1163/157181112X639078. SSRN 2087175. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  98. ^ "'Still experiencing a cultural genocide'". BBC News. May 12, 2016. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  99. ^ Ross, Luana (1996). "Resistance and Survivance: Cultural Genocide and Imprisoned Native Women". Race, Gender & Class. 3 (2): 125–141. ISSN 1082-8354. JSTOR 41674793. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  100. ^ Bachman, Jeffrey S. (November 22, 2017). The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-69216-8. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  101. ^ a b "U.S. report identifies burial sites linked to boarding schools for Native Americans". NPR. May 11, 2022. Archived from the original on January 14, 2023. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  102. ^ a b c d "U.S. confronts 'cultural genocide' in Native American boarding school probe". Reuters. May 18, 2022. Archived from the original on November 20, 2022.
  103. ^ a b "US boarding school investigative report released". Indian Country Today. May 11, 2022. Archived from the original on January 14, 2023. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  104. ^ Warrior, Robert, ed. (2018). Speaking of Indigenous Politics: Conversations with Activists, Scholars, and Tribal Leaders. University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/j.ctv8j71d. ISBN 978-1-5179-0478-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctv8j71d. S2CID 242035747.
  105. ^ a b "Violence Against American Indian and Alaska Native Women and Men". National Institute of Justice. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  106. ^ "True Consequences: Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls". trueconsequences.libsyn.com. Archived from the original on December 24, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2019.
  107. ^ Policy Insights – Brief Statistics on Violence Against Native Women (PDF). NCAI Policy Research Center. 2013. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 15, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2019. A previously reported statistic that, "Among [American Indian and Alaska Native] victims of rape or sexual assault, 86 percent described the offender as non‐Indian" is accurate according to Perry's analysis (2004) in American Indians and Crime: A BJS Statistical Profile, 1992–2002. However, Perry's analysis includes reports by both Native men and women victims of rape or sexual assault. Given this brief's focus on violence against Native women, we include the updated rate of 67 percent reported by Native women victims of rape or sexual assault indicated in Bachman, et al., (2008).
  108. ^ Rosay, André B. (May 2016). "Violence Against American Indian and Alaska Native Women and Men: 2010 Findings From the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey" (PDF). National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). National Institute of Justice. p. 56. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 30, 2019. Retrieved January 12, 2020. Table A.5: American Indian or Alaska Native Female Victims: Sexual violence in lifetime by interracial perpetrator confidence interval (likelihood) weighted estimate (weighed based on percentage of population) 91.9% to 100.5% and intraracial perpetrator 10.8% to 30.4%
  109. ^ Roe, Bubar; Jumper Thurman, Pamela (2004). "Violence against native women". Social Justice. 31 (4 [98]): 70–86. JSTOR 29768276. Archived from the original on October 30, 2019. Retrieved October 30, 2019. Natives are more likely to be victims of crime than are any other group in the United States. People of a different race committed 70% of violent victimizations against Natives. The report also notes the rate of violent crime experienced by Native women between 1992 and 1996 was nearly 50% higher than that reported by African American males, long known to experience very high rates of violent victimization. According to the Department of Justice, 70% of sexual assaults of Native women are never reported, which suggests that the number of violent victimizations of Native women is higher (Ibid.).
  110. ^ Chekuru, Kavitha (March 6, 2013). "Sexual violence scars Native American Women". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on November 17, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2016. According to the Department of Justice, 86 percent of rapes and sexual assaults against Native American women are committed by non-Native American men.
  111. ^ "ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates – 2011–2015". U.S. Census Bureau. Archived from the original on February 13, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
  112. ^ Waghorn, Dominic (April 6, 2015). "Law Targets Abuse Of Native American Women". Sky News. Sky UK. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved January 12, 2020.
  113. ^ a b Theobald, Brianna (November 28, 2019). "A 1970 Law Led to the Mass Sterilization of Native American Women. That History Still Matters". Time. Archived from the original on April 26, 2022.
  114. ^ a b c d d'Errico, Peter (January 10, 2017). "Native American Genocide or Holocaust?". Indian Country Today. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022.
  115. ^ Blackhawk, Ned; Kiernan, Ben; Madley, Benjamin; Taylor, Rebe, eds. (2023). Genocide in the Indigenous, Early Modern and Imperial Worlds, from c.1535 to World War One. Pp 38,44. The Cambridge World History of Genocide. Vol. II. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48643-9.
  116. ^ Madley, Benjamin (2016). An American Genocide: The United States and the California Indian Catastrophe, 1846-1873. New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-0300181364.
  117. ^ Moshman, David (May 15, 2007). "Us and Them: Identity and Genocide". Identity. 7 (2): 115–135. doi:10.1080/15283480701326034. S2CID 143561036.

Notes

  1. ^ While estimates vary widely, historians, including Joan Marsh-Thornton, place the pre-1492 population of the present-day United States at around 5 million.[1] The Native population in the U.S. reached its lowest point in 1900 at 237,000.[2]
  2. ^ Native Americans constituted 0.7% of U.S. population in 2015.[111]