Talk:Science Olympiad

Is that vandalism? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.53.218.27 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Yep, got it. You can always be bold and take care of it yourself! (ESkog)^(Talk) 05:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring

Are you sure the method given for scoring is correct? I know at state and regional copetitions 1st is given 11 points (it's higher at state), 2nd gets 10 points, etc. highest score wins.

The article is correct for New York regional and state, at least. --AySz88 ^-^ 01:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wandered over to the SO forums after posting my question, and the way stated there is the SO recomended way of doing it.

not to be rude,but what do you think about plattsburg MO"s team? i mean they always smoke regionals and they do really well. i think they might go all the wya this year

__
Scoring wise, I think the article is correct- there are many different ways to do it. At nationals, and the way it is done in NJ, they give 1 point for first place, 2 for second, 3 for third and so on. At the same time, I believe some states do it differently.
Ursypretty 22:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Event and event description formatting

There's been some inconsistency for a while about the event list and their respective descriptions, so I'd like to check: should we create descriptions for all the events, or put the event list without any description? Just wondering... --Havocrazy 03:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]