Talk:Mount Liang

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Mount Liang be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in China may be able to help!

Mount Liang vs. Mount Liangshan

I moved it to the former from the latter based on google. --Jia ng 08:39, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Calling it a "modern county" doesn't make any sense, while a "modern city" does make sense. Badagnani 16:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

County in China has been an administrative division since Qin Dynasty, more than 2000 years ago. The territory of modern Liangshan County is probably different from the ancient Liangshan County. Therefore I think that it's OK to say modern county. --Neo-Jay 04:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]