Jump to content

Talk:NunSexMonkRock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 7 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Album}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 11:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Horribly biased writing

[edit]

Sounds like this page was written by a fanboy/fangirl. Super biased. Just state the facts, nobody cares about your individual opinions of each song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.191.32 (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to agree. I own this album and enjoy it a great deal, but the article as it stands is way over the top in its fawning fannishness. That said, I believe the infant in Hagen's arms on the cover is actually her daughter, Cosma Shiva (there's a song by the same name on the album). Can anyone find a citation for that? I've looked, but have had no luck. 72.0.15.8 (talk) 14:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The current version has a terrible opening paragraph. It reads more like a single person writing a blog post about how much they feel about NunSexMonkRock. fawning fannishness indeed.
JamesThomasMoon1979 01:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]