This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 11:06, 7 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Cuba}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:06, 7 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Cuba}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
I have initiated a proposal for WikiProject Cigars, dedicated to improving the coverage of cigar brands, the cigar making process, and other cigar-related matters on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in the project or would like to weigh in, pro or con, on this idea, please pay a quick visit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Cigars. Thanks! —Tim Carrite (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of those articles that clearly is being utilized to market a product, in this case cigars and a company owned by the same family. It looks that it has been written by one of those mentioned in the article itself and the same source is used time after time. The article is also being used to show some political points of view.
While I don't think this article is harmful in itself I believe the tone of articles like this should be looked at by some seasoned editor because particularly with reference to value added articles it is not that difficult to find articles clearly created with the intention of giving publicity and increasingly with some smelly personal comments in regard to religion or politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.12.63 (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}