Jump to content

Talk:Emeliana Aiza

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 14:01, 7 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Bolivia}}, {{WikiProject Organized Labour}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject Women}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Good articleEmeliana Aiza has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
    Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    August 21, 2023Good article nomineeListed
    Did You Know
    A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 4, 2023.
    The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that while serving in the Bolivian parliament, legislator Emeliana Aiza took night courses to receive her high school baccalaureate?


    Article neutrality

    The articles seems to impart real information in a way that doesn’t add context to the subject of the article. 2605:8D80:408:269B:B010:48E8:E01D:A5D6 (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Your comment is incomprehensible. —Alalch E. 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the gasolinazo. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Although, I'm not sure what this has to do with article neutrality. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    This is an article about a Bolivian politician, yet none of the mentions of Bolivia link back to the page on Bolivia.

    Why is this? I've noticed similar things on other articles. What's the rule on this? DontLikeRedesign (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    @DontLikeRedesign: At least for me, I generally don't link countries in articles, per MOS:OVERLINK, which includes nations in its list of subjects most readers are likely already familiar with. My interpretation is that if someone is reading an article about a Bolivian politician, they're probably at least somewhat knowledgeable about what Bolivia is. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]