Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radhika Gupta

Radhika Gupta

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

person does not seem notable, seems purely promotional. User4edits (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The language and tonality have been revised to meet the Wikipedia content norms/guidelines. Notability has also been improved. Sources have been added as well. Abhi1705 (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the sourcing in the article seems to show the notability of the subject. The article needs substantial cleanup to remove WP:PEACOCK and promotional content. I would like to read other editors' opinions with respect to notability.

I do not find her notability as per WP:NBIO or NBASIC/GNG, she has been mentioned sparsely for several reasons as any businessman would. Secondly, where there is any coverage dedicated on the individual such as this, it appears to be paid and even if not, does not establish her notability as a businesswoman.User4edits (talk) 10:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Some coverage about her on the Shark Tank show [1]. This isn't the greatest but it's about her in a RS [2]. Oaktree b (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page in not to be like a promotional. She has a public life and sufficient media coverage. Srander (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]