Talk:Battle of Hieton

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Anglo-Scottish war (1650–1652) was copied or moved into Battle of Hieton with this edit on 00:04, 20 February 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Hieton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015143243/http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk:81/scotgaz/features/featurefirst9971.html to http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk:81/scotgaz/features/featurefirst9971.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B class review

B class. However, please check whether you agree with my correction. See below. Djmaschek (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ORIGINAL: the more dogmatic thought God had deserted them because the the army had not been sufficiently purged of godliness, and argued that too much faith had been put in a worldly prince who was not sufficiently committed to the cause of the Covenant.
CORRECTED: the more dogmatic thought God had deserted them because the army had not been sufficiently purged of godlessness, and argued that too much faith had been put in a worldly prince who was not sufficiently committed to the cause of the Covenant. (Removed extra "the" and changed "godliness" to "godlessness". After all, only an atheist army would purge soldiers for godliness.)

@Djmaschek: Completely correct. That was a very last minute change, and clearly I didn't proofread it closely enough. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]