This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 18:59, 11 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Bibliographies}}, {{WikiProject Islam}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:59, 11 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Bibliographies}}, {{WikiProject Islam}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Only include books which have their own articles
The 2019 AfD which resulted in Keep, but with many people implicitly invoking WP:CSC #1, namely Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own article in the English Wikipedia. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the near future. The 2019 AfD on "Bibliography of books critical of Christianity" also resulted in Keep, but also with many people implicitly invoking WP:CSC #1. At Bibliography of books critical of Christianity, this rule is being enforced, but here it hasn't. Therefore, I am going to do that now. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree with the heading. What it does need is documented inclusion criteria. Bibliographies are a rare kind of list where I don't think we need dedicated articles for each listing (it's a bibliography, not an index, after all). Here's one possible criteria:
Has a stand-alone article, or
The author has a stand-alone article which mentions the book, or
It is published by a reputable publisher and supported by at least two reliable sources indicating it is indeed critical of Islam.
