Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilda Diaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Voorts (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 12 February 2024 (changing !vote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wilda Diaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mayor. This article cites a lot of sources, but they're all just routine coverage of her mayoral administration by local outlets in New Jersey. Several of the articles aren't even news coverage, they're just pages on government websites. 55,000 is not a big enough population to inherently justify giving the mayor a Wikipedia page, and it seems like no other mayors of this town have Wikipedia pages except the ones who went on to hold higher office. I don't see anything she's done that makes her notable enough for a Wikipedia page. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in addition to the NBC source provided by voorts, a second GNG source is a story box about her in "Women and Politics: A Quest for Political Equality in an Age of Economic Inequality" by Barbara Burrell (2017). Beginning on page 120 of the textbook, Burrell features Diaz. Between those two sources and the existing sources, this is a GNG pass. --Enos733 (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two more GNG articles (one found, one alluded to). Coverage in the NY Times after her initial election: "Newcomer’s Rise Signals a Shift in Power New York Times. Jul 6, 2008 (one representative quote "political analysts say victories like those by Ms. Diaz represent a significant generational shift in state politics"). Also, it is mentioned that she was "featured in Real Simple Magazine as, “The Accidental Politician” among only four female mayors nation-wide." I have not found the article, but if it does say what it is alleged to say, it should also be an independent, significant source. --Enos733 (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in the book, the story box is an excerpt from the NBC piece, not a separate source. That said, I think the NY Times article in addition to the NBC piece meets GNG, so I will be changing my !vote. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]