Talk:Ephebophilia

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ephebophilia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 2 months

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Remove

I support removing or rephrasing at least parts of this poorly-sourced undue content which appears as an attempt normalize ephebophilia, including "It's not unusual for a typical 16-year-old to be attractive to many men" without a systemic review, or even study, to support this.

Mid-to-late adolescents typically have [[Sex differences in humans\|physical characteristics]] near or identical to that of legal adults.<ref name="Phenix"/> Because of this, scholars Skye Stephens and [[Michael C. Seto]] argue that ephebophilia contrasts what a [[paraphilia]] entails since "older adolescents are reproductively viable and the fact that typically men are sexually attracted to older adolescents, as reflected in self-report, [[psychophysiological]], and [[pornography]] use studies."<ref name="Phenix"/> [[Psychiatry\|Psychiatrist]] and [[Sexology\|sexologist]] [[Fred Berlin]] states that most men can find persons in this age group sexually attractive, but that "of course, that doesn't mean they're going to act on it. Some men who become involved with teenagers may not have a particular disorder. Opportunity and other factors may have contributed to their behaving in the way they do".<ref name=www.usccb.org/> According to psychologist and sexologist [[James Cantor]], it is "very common for regular men to be attracted to 18-year-olds or 20-year-olds. It's not unusual for a typical 16-year-old to be attractive to many men and the younger we go the fewer and fewer men are attracted to that age group."<ref>{{cite magazine\|first=Wesley\|last=Stephenson\|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28526106\|title=How many men are paedophiles?\|magazine=BBC Magazine\|publisher=[[BBC]]\|location=London, England\|date=30 July 2014\|access-date=2 December 2018}}</ref>

Does anyone agree or disagree? Chamaemelum (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement is based on cultural opinion, not on biological and scientific facts. So removing it would be a bad step, but adding more context that would explain why it is happening and why it is / is not acceptable in society would be probably useful. 89.22.81.167 (talk) 11:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]