This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
The only source of death is from the Brazilian blog Memórias Cinematográficas. Is this a reliable source or did they just copy Wikipedia like many others (the only addition is that she died at her home)? This sounds strange for a death that occurred in the USA. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We used Aveleyman.com to update Meg Randall's page. The site has always been reliable and is not blacklisted (SAG-AFTRA or something similar later confirmed Randall's death), so don't revert edits pretending they are unsourced.--Folengo (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Folengo Sorry, my mistake. I initially saw the latest anonymous edit Special:Diff/899921916, which added the death in the infobox, and did not see immediately that a source was added in a previous edit, then I reverted the other ones without checking carefully. But please, when doing a change in an article, add something useful in the summary (the log), which is what is visible in the history; yours was empty and this was not helpful. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]