Talk:Iran–United States relations after 1979

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kurdistan High‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Fair use rationale for Image:Meeting of Irap president Jalal Talabani with supreme leader of Iran Khamenei.gif

Image:Meeting of Irap president Jalal Talabani with supreme leader of Iran Khamenei.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

May I ask, why is the page named Diplomatic tensions between Iran and the United States, and not Diplomatic tensions between the United States and Iran? Iran has expressed a willingness to sit down and talk with the United States; while the U.S. has repeatedly rejected and blocked such moves. I propose renaming this page, as above. What do other editors say? smb 22:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you say about which side is trying diplomacy is correct based on externally sourced references which anyone can find fairly easily, but i don't really see a difference between "between A and B" and "between B and A" - i don't think the order suggests which one is the cause of the tensions. Boud (talk) 01:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

I propose to merge this artcile with Iran–United States relations because it is the same topic and content. Although, the present article is only part of Iran–United States relations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.251.98 (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support due to the large overlap between the topics. CopaceticThought (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is a more focused coverage of one story. Iran-US relation is an article that is to cover many stories and we do not want to make it too long. Sinooher (talk) 07:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Iran-United States relations (1979-today) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 18:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Placed relevant templates on this article page and the Iran–United States relations page. November 2011. Batram (talk) 07:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic tensions between Iran and the United States → Iran–United States relations after 1979 – Relisting. Jenks24 (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC) As pretty much all the diplomatic tensions are since Iran's Islamic Revolution, this article is essentially about US-Iran relations since 1979, and should be renamed accordingly. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. See WP:HYPHEN and WP:DASH at WP:MOS. An en dash is needed instead of the first hyphen in the proposed title; and also instead of the second one, but that range is already faulty because "today" is included. So the title is already dated and doomed. With respect, I suggest withdrawing this RM and trying one that has some hope of success. Noetica^Tea? 03:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Moved to support, following revision of the proposed title. Noetica^Tea? 08:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All of your objections are minor technical ones. Rather then withdrawing, please suggest the minor formatting changes and I will change the request accordingly. Would changing (1979-today) to Since 1979 be a better solution? (Also, please type the title as I have no idea how to type an en-dash) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  No problem. I suggest this: "Iran–United States relations after 1979". But others will specialist knowledge might prefer some variant on that. I will support any reasonable choice. (To make an en dash, insert by clicking on the very first item in the "Insert" range of options, under the edit window in which you type. See WP:DASH for other ways, and a link from there too.) Noetica^Tea? 20:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Revised accordingly. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've relisted this so we can get some opinions on Dondegroovily's new proposed title. Jenks24 (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support but Iran–United States relations from 1979 might be even better, since the problems started in (not after) 1979. I would also support work being done to integrate this article and Iran–United States relations making this one a specialised "main" article for the other. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's the whole point of this move request, making this a main article for the other. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Iran–United States relations after 1979. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Iran–United States relations after 1979. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Iran–United States relations after 1979. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: procedural close: requester has been blocked as a sockpuppet and no one else has !voted in support. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iran–United States relations after 1979 → Iran–United States conflict – This page reflects on the "tensions" between Iran and the United States. If it focuses on that, I think that the proposed name would be better. It will better enhance the situation between the two, a rather ambiguous conflict, sprawling between direct crisis to proxy warfare througout the Muslim World. It will also better reflect on the name most people use. Either way, I propose this article be renamed due to the reasons above. Trenton698 (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. That is imposing a very particular view on relations after 1979. It is much too ambiguous to characterize it specifically as a "conflict". I am not sure which "people" you are referring to. The current title is NPOV, your proposal moves it to a rather POVish. Walrasiad (talk) 15:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment:When I was refering to people, I was refering to the general population in both contries. Many people believe that both of them are in an active conflict, so it wouuld make more sense. Plus, the title I suggested isn't that POV-ish. Just because it is labeling it a conflict and not relations or tensions does not mean the POV is slanted and put to the other's advantage. They are both in open conflict (confirmed during the Tanker War and the 2019-2020 crisis), which would reasonably make a lot more sense of renaming.Trenton698 (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.