Talk:Lludd Llaw Eraint

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Low‑importance

	Lludd Llaw Eraint is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which Lludd?

There is some serious confusion in this article. 'Lludd fab Beli' and 'Lludd/Nudd Llaw Eraint' are generally considered to be two separate figures in Welsh tradition and are normally treated as such. See for instance Rachel Bromwich's edition of Trioedd Ynys Prydein under Nudd Hael and Llŷr Llediaith (Lledyeith) and Bernhard Maier's Dictionary of Celtic Religion and Culture under 'Lludd mab Beli' and 'Lludd Llaw Ereint'. This article is very misleading as it stands. Enaidmawr (talk) 21:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]