Talk:Mir EO-19

Mir EO-19 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 11, 2023.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Science & education Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Thank you for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Prose OK, MoS sufficiently complied with
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
~~Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir~~

Done Added mention/ref to address this concern.

Thanks for sorting this out
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
OK
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
OK
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]
OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mir EO-19. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.astronautix.com/flights/mireo19.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.astronautix.com/flights/mireo20.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]