User talk:CCCC10

Welcome!

Hi, CCCC10. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit the teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Shadowssettle_(talk) 10:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Multifuel Energy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Multifuel Energy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from multifuelenergy.com/about-multifuel-energy-limited. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ToeFungii (talk) 08:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mersey Ferries (Company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mersey Ferries (Company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 09:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SP Energy Networks moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SP Energy Networks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 08:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

I see that you have made a number of undiscussed page moves. Please read the conventions carefully; for example WP:NCCORP. I have moved Northern Trains back. Please read the naming conventions, & revert your other unjustified moves. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Hi! You seem to be moving articles to new names in order to disambiguate them… except they weren’t ambiguous in the first place. See WP:NCDAB for a discussion of why we don’t do this. You might find it better, and certainly less work for others, if you ask on the talk page of articles you think are ambiguously named, to see if others agree with you. You can use the template {{requested move}} to attract attention to your query. Thanks. ◦ Trey Maturin 00:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liverpool Live 247 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool Live 247 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool Live 247 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 09:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you see a missing name in the infobox...

Hey, saw you added a name to Forth 1.

Most, but not all, articles where |name= is undeclared in {{Infobox radio station}} are that way because a visual edit was made to the infobox. There was a bug for multiple years that erased several fields when a visual edit was made to the contents of the infobox, so check for a visual edit in the edit history that inadvertently removed fields.

By the way, you might be interested in upcoming changes to the template: see Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations/2020 infobox redesign proposal. Raymie (t • c) 05:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hits

Stop replacing the logo, The next time you do could result in a block, Please seek wp:consensus on the talkpage, thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 13:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hits (former UK radio station) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Hits (former UK radio station), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Northern Trains, you may be blocked from editing. You were previously warned about moving the page, and moving pages without warning or discussion. You also should not be capitalising the disambiguation ("train operating company" not "Train Operating Company"). SK2242 (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed changes on articles related to Bauer Radio stations

Hello, CCCC10. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bylandandsea (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hits Radio Suffolk

Are you aware of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations? We'd developed a consensus to leave the stations rolled up into GHR at their pre-2020 names. Is Hits Radio Suffolk different enough from GHR on local content to merit a move? Raymie (t • c) 17:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The station formerly known as Town 102 was revived became Hits Radio Suffolk on 3 November 2020 and its sister station (Ipswich 102) became GHR Ipswich & Suffolk. thanks CCCC10

Are the Hits Radio stations structured like GHR where they have very little deviation from the network, or do they originate enough local programming to stay? (Pinging @Davey2010 and Tod55: as they probably know more than I do.) Raymie (t • c) 06:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are exactly the same as GHR, Hits is their more modern sounding national station, GHR is 70's, 80's and 90's national station (example change between the areas and Suffolk to see the same presenters https://planetradio.co.uk/hits-radio/schedule/ ). Town 102 should be restored as agreed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations @Raymie: Tod55 (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got reverted again. Pinging Tod55 too. I want to make sure that this is seen as an extension of the existing consensus. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SP Energy Networks

Hello, CCCC10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SP Energy Networks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SP Energy Networks (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

possibly notable but would require secondary sources covering them in-depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SP Energy Networks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SP Energy Networks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CCCC10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BBC Radio Merseyside, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeview. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks

Hi, please cite a reliable source for this change of name before you move the page again. Thanks. ◦ Trey Maturin 17:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Radio Three Counties

Whilst the logo of BBC Three Counties Radio has been oddly changed to read BBC RADIO Three Counties, the station itself has not been renamed, as is clear from every reference to it on the BBC website. I have requested the article be moved back to the original name. ◦ Trey Maturin 15:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Asian Network

Whilst the logo of the BBC Asian Network includes BBC RADIO, the station itself has not been renamed, as is clear from every reference to it on the BBC website. I have moved back to the original name. ◦ Trey Maturin 11:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same also applies to BBC Radio 1 Dance. ◦ Trey Maturin 11:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Hereford & Worcester

This is your final warning. The next time you move an article to a different name that is not supported by sources, you will be reported to administrators for further action. ◦ Trey Maturin 13:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the logo of the station, it’s pretty self explanatory. CCCC10 20:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC) CCCC10 (talk) 20:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The logos of the BBC services (and indeed logos of a vast number of things) do not represent the actual name of the service. All BBC radio stations have "BBC RADIO" in their logo. A cursory glance at the websites and BBC Sounds pages of the BBC's service reveals that the logos ==/== the service names. That much should be obvious. Logos are not reliable sources. Please stop. ◦ Trey Maturin 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Hits (former UK radio station)

Hello, CCCC10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Hits".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radio 1 Relax or relax

Hello, I saw that you moved the page BBC Radio 1 relax to BBC Radio 1 Relax. As far as I'm aware, there is no requirement for pagetitles to have capitals. There was a conversation started at Talk:BBC Radio 1 relax prior to your moving of the article, could you add your thoughts to that page? It may well be that it should have a capital "R" but I'd like to see the policy that states this if there is one. It's a good idea to check talk pages for existing discussion before moving an article. Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SP Energy Networks

Hello, CCCC10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SP Energy Networks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss (UK radio station)

Please desist from continually removing part of the lede from Kiss (UK radio station). Wikipedia articles are not an extension to a brand, they are intended to be encyclopaedic and should provide the reader with some history and context too and the lede is where this can be placed.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. There is already a concern that you may have a conflict of interest based upon previous similar edits to the article using this username and another.

Stop removing content, if you have an issue with it then go to the talk page to discuss. Thanks. Bylandandsea (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Greatest Hits Radio Liverpool & The North West. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Camelot Theme Park does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! L'Oiseau Lybre (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! L'Oiseau Lybre (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]