Jump to content

Talk:Maneuverable reentry vehicle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 20:51, 18 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

Isn't the Topol_M also a MaRV?

To the best of my knowledge it's not known to be MARV equipped. the statements of various russian government sources as to its being able to manouver around ABM systems are just as easily explained by mid-course or bus manouvering, which have nothing to do with the reentry vehicle itself. I would, however, point out that the indian Agni 3 system is supposedly MARV equipped, and isnt mentioned in the article. I dont have a firm source, but perhaps someone else does? Certainly the agni article implies that the warhead has gps and/or tercom guidance, which implies it's manouverable.Quadbox (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the following from the main article:

== Fiction ==

This article is about nuclear weapons, not tanks. That belongs on another page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.138.32.219 (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MARV vs. MIRV

[edit]

After browsing the list of systems given in the article, most of their articles state they have MIRV capabilities while MARV is not mentioned. Maybe a cleanup is needed? --2.240.176.113 (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Difference with quasiballistic missiles?

[edit]

Both types of missile perform maneuvers in the terminal stage of their flight, so what exactly is the difference between MaRVs and quasiballistics? Anthropophoca (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]