Jump to content

Talk:Fou Ts'ong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 15:10, 7 March 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Classical music}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: class.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

name change

[edit]

would anyone object to having this article moved under the name "Fu Cong" instead of the current "Fou Ts'ong" ? Seeing as his father is under "Fu Lei", i thought that maybe father and son should have their names with the same romanization method...

zeChinaman 03:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see this proposal went nowhere, but for the record, I would object to it. For better or worse, he's known in the West by the spelling we currently have. -- JackofOz (talk) 07:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Son

[edit]

So his son is dead?--89.14.125.250 (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fou Ts'ong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The Pianistic Art of Fou Ts'ong"

[edit]

I can find no indication that this album exists aside from its mention here. Is this perhaps a back-translation from Polish into English? I would be inclined to regard the Fryderyk Chopin Institute as reliable for claims about Chopin's interpreters, but this claim doesn't seem to check out. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AleatoryPonderings: it appears to be a "private issue " which implies it wasn't released commercially Source and another source in Polish. I don't speak Polish either, but Google Translate renders word for word "Martha Argerich, Leon Fleisher and Radu Lupu, fascinated by the art of Fou Ts'ong, privately released in 1994 a compact disc entitled "The Piano Art of Fou Ts'ong"." Zingarese talk · contribs 20:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zingarese, Yeah, on a second look the "private issue" bit seems critical. I asked at RSN about the Fryderyk Chopin Institute and it seems reliable, so I'm inclined to trust it on this as well. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

… does not seem to be highly regarded at WP:RSN. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_305#China_Daily and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_271#Chinese_news_sources. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted this again. The piece is a classic pre-concert puff piece; I wouldn't regard it as reliable for anything except perhaps the date/venue of the concert it's promoting. Can anyone access the full Grove's entry? I might try the Wikipedia Library but I've not managed to get it to work since they 'simplified' access.
Anyway, going offline now (need to practise my own piano). See where we are later. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have access to the full Grove entry, but it's only two paragraphs and says nothing about praise from his professors. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 04:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok, WL now gives that to me but there's no more text than the free sample. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]