Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 March 15
Little to any actual policy-based reasoning was used in this discussion, nor had any discussion taken place concerning the actual contents of the article-- the nominator simply compared the name of the article and proposed redirect target with the names of another article and redirect, and of the only two participants, one merely gave a WP:PERNOM vote, while the other participant suggested that a mention within the new target article would suffice. Closing admin performed a WP:BLAR as per nom, without adding anything to the new target article as per the second participant. ππ²π«ππͺππ«π«πππ ππ₯π’ ππ¬π¬π¬π¬π¬π«π¦π’π°π± (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's a correctly closed seven-year-old discussion, what exactly are you asking us to do here? SportingFlyer TΒ·C 13:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- ...Reinstate the article? Er. I was told by @Thryduulf: over at RfD that this was the proper method of getting a previously-deleted-by-RfD article reinstated. Did I screw up here? ππ²π«ππͺππ«π«πππ ππ₯π’ ππ¬π¬π¬π¬π¬π«π¦π’π°π± (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)