User talk:130.226.169.133
Look the main idea is:
Edward Lucas from The Economist found out that Mauco is working for the sepparatist regime, criminal and illegal of so-called Transnistria (see the article) now Mauco is a payed propagandist to make a clean image of Transnistrian sepparatis regime.
Transnistria is not recognized by UN or by any other country. It's illegal and criminal regime.
and William Mauco is a payed propagandist. See Lucas article about it
Covering tracks
Aug 3rd 2006
From Economist.com
How to disguise, inflate and disappear on the internet
TRACKING down the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS) which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria (see article), is easy at first, then very difficult.
The first port of call is, of course, icdiss.org. This is nicely designed and eloquently written. At first sight, it looks like just what it claims to be—the product of some seasoned foreign-policy wonks who want to get their hands dirty in helping new countries to get on their feet. But all the details are strikingly vague.
The website’s registration can be found at srsplus.com. Googling those details shows no trace on the internet for the “Robinson Corbett-Smith” who registered the site on January 14th this year. The address given is a hotel. The phone number is incomplete. A reverse IP search reveals that the site is hosted in Riga, Latvia, along with 850-odd others, mostly relatively innocent such as rapegod.com, but also pridnestrovie.net and visitpmr.com which are propaganda sites for Transdniestria. These sites acknowledge help from the ICDISS.
- Why would I care about any of this. I'm not disputing that people are socks of people, and that people are blocked. I just don't understand why you are redirecting talk pages of blocked users. --Onorem 13:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I am very confused by this edit of yours. Whether or not that user is a sockpuppet, they have certainly not been blocked indefinitely so that it an inappropriate tag to be adding. Will (aka Wimt) 13:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- I've reverted the tag. You might want to stop accusing everyone you disagree with as being a sock. --Onorem 13:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
OK.
Please analyse
Pernambuco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
and
William Mauco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
it's the same person, having 2 socks. Can you imagine? Do you see how different they are? and still it's the same person.
checkuser don't lie...
- and what does that have to do with Deltabeignet (talk · contribs), an administrator you just tagged as being blocked indefinitely for being a sockpuppet? You are not in a position to judge and tag as proven. --Onorem 13:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Pernambuco fools us more than 6 months, can you trust? Maybe Deltabeignet is not him, but has similar edits.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |