Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5/Society/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Vital articles. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Add Amusement arcade
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Arcade game is at V4. I think the type of venue where arcade games are played should be listed here.
- Support
- As nominator. feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 01:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, the fond memories of youth. Of course, V5. An interesting oversight consdering video game topics tend to be overrepresented at V5. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- per above. More important than some individual video games. starship.paint (RUN) 09:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'm not convinced we need more than one semiconductor fabrication plant on the list beyond TSMC 5.
- Support
- As nominator. 𝒻eminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 13:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The article does not make it clear why this company is vital. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- per above. starship.paint (RUN) 08:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've nominated a bunch of nonverbal communication topics above. This is another one we don't currently list.
- Support
- As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- definitely Aurangzebra (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- :) starship.paint (RUN) 15:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- 🙂 QuicoleJR (talk) 13:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Feminist: Thanks. And a lot of them need to go on V4 as soon as they are ok'ed here, which is generally not a problem... you can probably start the noms early per snow. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- (◕‿◕✿) Vileplume (talk) 12:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A very common practice in Everyday life. Place this under Courtship 4
- Support
- As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 11:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely vital. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sure. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
Add Haute couture
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If we list nine individual fashion designs, we should list the concept.
- Support
- As nominator. feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Per nom Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 11:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree. Gizza (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Austrian school of economics had a profound impact on economic thought and policy. The school, with figures like Ludwig von Mises 5 and Friedrich Hayek 4, has significantly shaped classical liberal and free-market theories. Its emphasis on individualism, subjective value theory, and critiques of central planning have enduring relevance in economic debates and policymaking, making it an essential subject for understanding diverse economic ideologies. The Blue Rider 16:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support
- As nominator. The Blue Rider 16:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support an important influence on the likes of Reagan and Thatcher. Gizza (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
Remove Catwoman 5, add Fantastic Four
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support Batman character. 52 interwikis, ~1,700 pageviews are not bad, but I stand by by view that we need to remove some superhero entries for balance reasons. She also suffers from being a supporting character with no movie or TV series of her own, and no memorable impact on pop culture. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support
- As nom. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- essentially swap her and for the more important Fantastic Four Encyclopaedia Britannica: Fantastic Four, created
in 1961, that brought an element of realism to the genre unique for its time. A cornerstone of Marvel’s universe of characters, the Fantastic Four remains one of the most popular superhero teams in comic book history [...] quickly became a triumph for Marvel ... By the late 1960s the Fantastic Four’s acclaim had extended beyond comic books.
There have been four animated series and three films of the characters. starship.paint (RUN) 14:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Support swap with Fantastic Four. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 14:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Strike per below. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support add The numerous animated series and films document vitality.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support addition. Neutral on removal. I do think Marvel’s first family should be on here, but I’m not sure if we need to get rid of Catwoman to add them. I do think we should have at least three supervillians, and she is probably the most visible female villain in comics. At the same time though, she is not on par with either the Joker or Dr. Doom. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Oppose Catwoman as an individual female villain. Removing her leaves 4 male villians. Since we also only have one female superhero (Wonder Woman 4) out of 14 removing Catwoman would make it 1 out of 19 in the higher joint Superhero media subjects category. Catwoman should only be swapped out for an individual woman (not a group with a woman).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger "one female superhero" - Western, there is Sailor Moon (character) 5 there too. I'd consider supporting Supergirl, although quota remains a concern. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- With the first name Sailor, I assumed she was male without looking further. That still does not address the lack of female villains without Catwoman.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger "one female superhero" - Western, there is Sailor Moon (character) 5 there too. I'd consider supporting Supergirl, although quota remains a concern. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Was about to write the same as Tony yesterday, could see a case for a replacement with Harley Quinn, but that's likely a recentism. Respublik (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely not convinced by the claim of her not having a pop culture impact, dedicated works aside Totalibe (talk) 10:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose both. I can see arguing in the 60s or 70s that the Fantastic Four were more prominent, but due to a bad luck of licensing and poor movies / few TV shows made with them, Catwoman seems to eclipse the FF in popularity / notability. SnowFire (talk) 05:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral
- Discuss
- @Piotrus: - I guess Catwoman (film) was so bad until you refuse to acknowledge its existence. starship.paint (RUN) 11:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- That said though, how about swapping her for the Fantastic Four, which has had multiple TV series and multiple films? I think the main reason why 20th Century Fox bought Spider-Man, X-Men and the Fantastic Four from Marvel was because these were tbe most popular characters. starship.paint (RUN) 12:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Starship.paint: Ha, forgot about that dud, but the film was hardly noticeable outside being pretty bad :) No Joker here. And yes, I'd support a swap for F4. Feel free to propose this an an option or vote accordingly and treat my comment here as a vote for swap that can be copied or referenced as needed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- That said though, how about swapping her for the Fantastic Four, which has had multiple TV series and multiple films? I think the main reason why 20th Century Fox bought Spider-Man, X-Men and the Fantastic Four from Marvel was because these were tbe most popular characters. starship.paint (RUN) 12:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Piotrus, Starship.paint, and Hanif Al Husaini:, I just wanted to make sure everyone saw my objection. Also, she is an extremely popular Halloween costume (probably by a wide margin over all the other villains combined).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Respublik and Totalibe:, do you also oppose adding Fantastic Four? --Makkool (talk) 13:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Swap Tazos for Milk caps (game)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Tazos is a brand of Pog or milk cap, and not enough well-known to be VA5
- Support
- pbp 20:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think I proposed removal a short while ago, which I assume failed. Might be prudent to ping particpants of this - can be found in archives I am sure. Anyway, I support adding milk caps as less commercial and more historical/global.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Blue Rider 00:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Discuss
@Piotrus: - it's still active above #Remove Tazos 5 starship.paint (RUN) 15:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)