Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gonnym (talk | contribs) at 10:00, 21 March 2024 (Template:2002 NFC standings: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unused and unlinked from anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 07:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Readded. The template was off the page for about a month.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in use, so withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. A different table style is used at 2002 NFL season#Final regular season standings. Gonnym (talk) 07:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per nomination.  Mta910 (talk) 23:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this the template is for the entire NFC conference. The templates that already exist for the divisions.
Mta910 (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in use, so withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MBTA platform diagrams

Single-use templates on their respective articles (Back Bay station and Park Street station). Tabular track layout diagrams of these types were deprecated in 2020: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2020#Closure of 2019 station layout RFC. Park Street has an RDT-style diagram anyway; Back Bay isn't a complex station. Mackensen (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TMPG ("Templates that violate the guidelines on this page, have poorly defined function, are redundant, become orphaned or used on only one page, or violate any Wikipedia policies may be nominated for deletion"). Normally, I would subst these, but they are also fairly redundant. I should note, though, that only platform layout tables are discouraged, not {{Routemap}}-style track layouts. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]