User talk:Revolucien

This is Revolucien's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaos Warehouse (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ARandomName123 were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chaos Warehouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Revolucien! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ARandomName123,

Thank you for the assist on the Paid Editor statement! Revolucien (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

About your draft. You really need to read two guidance documents:

Wikipedia:Golden Rule explains what we expect to see in terms of sources cited in an article.
Wikipedia:BACKWARD explains how to gather information for a draft: gather reliable sources that are independent of you first, and then write the article based on what those sources say, not based on what you know or have written in the past.

Finally, WP:BAND explains the criteria for inclusion for musicians and ensembles. Chaos Warehouse would need to meet at least one criterion. If Chaos Warehouse doesn't meet any of the criteria listed, then it cannot have an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Revolucien. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Revolucien. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Revolucien|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:Sdkb could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment adjusted to remove outside any outside interest. The civility may have been bypassed slightly when untrue statements about Chaos Warehouse were made in a public forum. The facts have been provided to show Skdb the error and a polite request to have his untrue statement removed. Thank you for your insight.

Very respectfully,

Lucien Levasseur Revolucien (talk) 21:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaos Warehouse (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing in this draft suggests that the band or the artist meets a single criterion in WP:BAND. This article cannot be accepted until evidence of notability is shown. See the advice given on your talk page and follow it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chaos Warehouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chaos Warehouse

Hello, Revolucien. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chaos Warehouse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chaos Warehouse

Hello, Revolucien. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chaos Warehouse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]