Talk:Bombing of Dresden

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bombing of Dresden article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Bombing of Dresden. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Bombing of Dresden at the Reference desk.

Bombing of Dresden was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 14, 2005, February 13, 2006, February 13, 2007, February 13, 2008, February 13, 2009, February 13, 2010, February 13, 2013, February 13, 2015, February 13, 2018, February 13, 2022, and February 13, 2023.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / British / European / German / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

On 30 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Bombing of Dresden in World War II to Bombing of Dresden. The result of the discussion was Moved.

Section about German Village

In 1943 the UK and US government constructed a site known as "German Village" in Dugway Utah at a US Army base. The US Americans contracted Standard Oil to construct houses that resemble worker-class residential housing, which was used to optimize the incendiary bombs later used on the Bombing of Dresden.

I think this information, that the US and UK government actively invested over half a million dollars in engineering better ways to destroy residential housing, demonstrates an intent to commit war crimes that should be added to this article.

There are several references for this available in the External Links section of the following article:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Village_(Dugway_Proving_Ground)#External_links

Would someone be interested in adding a section about the "German Village" to this article?

Numbers of people killed

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

The number of persons killed in the bombing of Dresden in World War II is a frequent topic on this talk page. If you wish to raise this subject again, before doing so please:
(A) Familiarise yourself with previous discussions in the talk page archive;
(B) Take into consideration the findings of the Historical Commission on the Air Raids on Dresden between February 13 and 15, 1945 (Historikerkommission zu den Luftangriffen auf Dresden zwischen dem 13. und 15. Februar 1945) which was set up by the Lord Mayor of Dresden in January 2007 and reported on 17 March 2010. You can find the full report of the commission at [1] (use Google translate if you don't speak German), in which you will find:
"Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse Im Ergebnis der von der Kommission vorgenommenen Untersuchungen wird festgestellt: Bei den Luftangriffen auf Dresden vom 13. bis 15. Februar 1945 wurden bis zu 25.000 Menschen getötet."
This translates (electronically) as "summary of results As a result of the investigations carried out by the Commission, it is found: During the air strikes on Dresden from February 13th to 15th, 1945 up to 25,000 people were killed."
(C) Take into account work written by historians after the date that the commission published its findings. (For instance, Overy, Richard (26 September 2013). The Bombing War: Europe, 1939–1945. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0-14-192782-4.);
(D) Remember that, as per WP:NOTFORUM, the talk page is to discuss content of the article and is not for general discussion of the subject.
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment that does not comply with this request (particularly talk page archive content)

The 'up to' is of course nonsense. It was merely a very, very conservative estimate. There was also pressure on the historians commission to minimize the number of people killed. The hole affair was intellectually dishonest from the beginning. In other words: This isn't a reliable source for knowledge on the number of people killed in Dresden. The former GDR-government gave far higher figures than that when ask. Apparently based on demographic statistics of the town. I think they counted 200.000 missing, but the city was also full of refugees, whose dead wouldn't be counted as residents. 105.12.2.94 (talk) 06:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number of dead

The 25-30k figure is the lowest estimate by the soviets, and it is completely unknown what it is based on. More than 30000 bodies had been recovered, even though a lot could have been obliterated and many buried. The source here settles on about 60k. It is from the USAFE, who as the legal descendent of the USTAF, are interested in keeping the numbers low. And even they accept a 60k figure. Which also lines up better with the higher area said to have been burning. This should be corrected. https://media.defense.gov/2013/May/23/2001329959/-1/-1/0/Dresden%20again.pdf 2001:4C4C:1EE6:5000:11AD:AA4F:3684:30B1 (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, 25,000 is the approximate number established by the Historical Commission in 2010. In March 1945 the Dresden police gave an estimate of 20,204 bodies recovered. Goebbels' propaganda ministry released this to the neutral press with a zero crudely added to give 202,040. The Dresden police gave an estimate of an eventual 25,000 dead once recovery was complete (this turned out to be correct -- about 5,000 bodies were later recovered), and the propaganda ministry press release again added a zero to give 250,000. The police figure for corpses incinerated in the Altmarkt, on the notorious pyres, was 6,856, but the propaganda ministry inflated this to 68,560. (Frederick Taylor, Dresden 1945, p.424.) This is where all the disinformation stems from. It is not a good idea to rely on Josef Goebbels, or for that matter David Irving. Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

United States and Israel showing as belligerents on the side of Germany?

As of May 20, 2023 the belligerents on the side of the Germans include the United States (with a swastika in place of the stars) and Israel (with a swastika in place of the Star of David), which seems incorrect. 04 soccer.relic (talk) 01:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How article handles number of deaths

I get the feeling that the article has some "fossilised" bits of text that deal with the number of deaths. The most intensive study on this number was the historical commission that reported in 2010 (see pinned post, above). Yet we have Richard Evans' The Third Reich at War (published in 2008) providing a number (35,000) in the lead. I don't think that we are doing Evans any favours by quoting a number that predates the 2010 report. (Does anyone have access to any of his later books? If so, does his current thinking persist with the number cited in the first para of the lead?)

The footnote on the subject in the first paragraph lists the figures from a number of historians: but the higher numbers come from works written before the Historical Commission published (Burleigh's Moral Combat was published just a couple of months after the Commission's report – not enough time to make changes to a book that was in press.) Add to this the view of Overy (The Bombing War), and we seem to have the Historical Commission's report accepted by historians as the best estimate.

Even the final paragraph of the lead disagrees with the higher and lower numbers given in the first paragraph of the lead. The best interpretation that a reader can put on this is that the article is a little confused on the point.

At a minimum, the somewhat confused lead needs fixing.

Going further, I suggest that the article should use the Historical Commission findings as its best estimate. This is validated by both Beevor and Overy using those numbers. Do we have any historians using a different number after 2010?

There is already some discussion in the article of why there are varying numbers – this should certainly be mentioned in the lead. That discussion may need to be reviewed, but it should sit well alongside the article using a single best estimate figure. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved.(non-admin closure) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing of Dresden in World War II → Bombing of Dresden – Unnecessary disambiguation; proposed move target already redirects here. As TheForgottenKing earlier noted, comparable articles like Bombing of Tokyo and Attack on Pearl Harbor lack the qualifier. rblv (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still think this is the correct move. If there had been another major bombing of Dresden it might be necessary, but from what I can tell no such event exists. For anyone joining the conversation just now, my previous comment 9 months ago was as follows:

I think this article should just be titled Bombing of Dresden". Normally, battles and such are not titled <event> in <war>, but just <event>, especially if there's only one event. Other examples: Bombing of Tokyo, Attack on Pearl Harbor, Battle of Iwo Jima, etc. None of these are titled "<event> in World War II". Just a thought.

TheForgottenKing (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur on this - Dresden hasn't been bombed before or since this event, so the "in World War II" disambiguation is not needed. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the above comments. 296cherry (talk) 19:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. In the end 2010 RM it was stated that there were some other bombings in the 18th century. This is clearly the primary topic though, and an overdue move. — Amakuru (talk) 19:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it works that way for descriptive titles. Srnec (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase "bombardment of Dresden" is ambiguous. See siege of Dresden (1760) and possibly others. Insofar as "bombing of [city]" tends today to denote aerial bombardment, the proposal is not unreasonable. But it should be clear that this is not precedent for stripping "in World War II" from article titles just because we have no other one at the bare title. Srnec (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As there are no other major bombings of Dresden, the "World War II" in the title is unnecessary. DSOFOreverTYU ~ talk ~ Eurovision 16:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]