User talk:180.249.164.53

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to 2024 Summer Paralympics and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Raymarcbadz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymarcbadz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a structured explanation of how the results of investigation of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymarcbadz my IP as a sockpuppet from User:Raymarcbadz, because based on what I edited previously, I only edited the updated Paris 2024 qualifying results, added references, even deleted several sections that were not factual and misinformation from the qualification, but suddenly I only got an IP block and only received a clarification message that I did some abuse, and some of my edited were reverted, so this could be a lesson for me, not to make the same mistake, so that I am not accused of being that user with another IP or having an alliance with him.

Meanwhile, I actually trying to continue logging in with my existing wiki account, but I keep getting logged out and when I try to log in I can't, I've even created an account many times, but it still doesn't work, is there any suggestion to overcome this problem, so I also not fed up and tired of being accused of being User:Raymarcbadz and continuing to edit articles with anonymous status 180.249.164.53 (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your "existing wiki account" and what other accounts have you created (you say you've done so "many times")?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of my account is User:Stand for fact, User:Aaaa kasian aaaa, User:Jr Coke, and the other account uses this IP, but still, I kept logging out and only received a message that this was to avoid hijacking.

Oh yeah, and also you haven't given an explanation as to why I was blocked, I've read the investigation archive, and the only justification why I was blocked, is simply because I have the same editing style as User:Raymarcbadz and I continue to edit with Olympic related articles. So i come up with three points of conclusion:

1. It doesn't seem selfish to allow one point of view to be justified just because User:Sportsfan 1234 said that "Another day, another IP. Repeated same edits to Olympic related articles. Can we get a rangeblock?", because that's the only reason to blocked me from wikipedia.

2. I edit like this because I take references from other Olympic articles, even when adding or deleting references, there are considerations that I explain, or considering whether it explains the related content

3. Personally, I'm not even User:Raymarcbadz, I don't know who they are, in fact I only just found out about them when I got blocked on the basis of this "sockpuppet" user. Are there any specific losses resulting from my edits? Is there evidence of reporting that is detrimental to specific users regarding their edits, or what? I haven't found an explanation for this, even in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymarcbadz/Archive 180.249.164.53 (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even under the reasons I harm others, I opened User talk:180.249.164.53 and there wasn't a single comment blaming my edit for this, does this prove that there is an "ego" from other wikipedia users in order for them to get deeper accessibility article editing or what? 180.249.164.53 (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aaaa kasian aaaa doesn't exist. Did you misspell it?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I didn't misspell it wrong, I once logged in using that account, I even have a trace of that account on my IP.

Unfortunately, can you answered all of my points, or at least give some suggestion or way, because referring to the articles, I had to ask the administrator why I was blocked, and I used my rights, at least for comprehensive reasons, because I think there is a good reason for me to be un-blocked, but seems like using the initial steps you gave to appealing the blocks only left me in the middle of confusion. 180.249.164.53 (talk) 12:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I even have a trace of that account on my IP. I don't know what that means, but that account has never been registered on any Wikimedia project.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. It's true, I don't know where to send it to proof you, but I logged in to that account, once.

2. It seems, I'm really fed up, because with the long explanation, you pretend to be blind to it, I don't know the reason you're tired with me, or maybe from your point of view I didn't read the policy you gave (however i'm still reviewing those appealing blocks policies, and search for the reasons as why i'm not getting an respond for all of my concern). Honestly, I was disappointed with this misuse of power you had, so I had to apply for an appealing for a block, because there was no response, other than I was just blamed, accused, and be labelized like an unimportant and annoyed users who uses Wikipedia 180.249.164.53 (talk) 12:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently there have been several Indonesian IPs that have been blocked. Are those other IPs you?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the edits from the various IP's and the English is at a level where you start to question the competence of the writer (which the sock master also had). Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you ask about that;

1. I can prove that my writing is similar, because it takes references from previous Olympic articles, quotes available Olympic sections, and so on. This is why you see that on average my writing is similar, because most of them only edit a few words from other Olympic articles.

2. Is that the only identification to prove I am User:Raymarcbadz or is this a personal annoyance because I edited like those blocked users, which I don't really know who they are. Because to be honest, the identification and investigation is not comprehensive and one-handed is detrimental to users, and this is not intended, but this looks like an abuse of power to accuse random users. I know that it is obviously difficult to convince the investigation, but I also try to defend this with various concrete evidence, as proof that I don't deserve this block. 180.249.164.53 (talk) 04:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also question about the English competency of some of the edits, can you prove that in which article? Because all the articles I edit, never question writing editing competence, because:

1. Several edits, where I edited the words, even edited to add information, like updating some descriptions of sections of sports in the NOC at the 2024 Summer Olympics article, I edited because the description was limited, because there were other athletes who qualified in other fields, and add extra references to validate those thing.

2. In fact, in some information, I only updated the total number (for example competitors, new NOC qualified), and edited the table reference. Is there proof that I stated in the editing "this article does not comply with the principles of Olympic articles", or "grammatically errors", or writings that challenge and judge people's editing like that? 180.249.164.53 (talk) 04:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it is not. 180.249.164.53 (talk) 04:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.