Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Reddi (2nd nomination)

Anand Reddi

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resume written by User:UofMMedia, now blocked, likely a COI'd editor connected with the subject's alma mater or current employer. See related discussion on WP:COIN. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. The article has no significant independent coverage and I could not find any. See below for source assessment. He may meet WP:NACADEMIC (although I am skeptical) as he is co-author on a few papers with >200 citations. Note that Google Scholar data is incorrect, listing at least two papers on which he is not a co-author. However, if he is a notable academic we'd essentially have to start over from scratch to obtain a neutral article. Jfire (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Health and fitness, Science, and United States of America. Jfire (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a Pubmed listing of the Google Scholar articles.... The publications appear to be in peer reviewed journals. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22anand+reddi%22. There also does appear to be a number of global health publications and focus Ajsk123 (talk) 23:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

**Source assessment table:**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
European AIDS Treatment Group	~ Advocacy organization	~	Reddi is quoted	✘ No
Highleyman	? Dead link	?	?	? Unknown
University of Michigan	It's his alma mater		Dead link, but presumably routine university PR	✘ No
"Leadership"			Failed verification	✘ No
BMC Pediatr.	Paper co-authored by Reddi			✘ No
The Telegraph			Quote and brief coverage. Doesn't support claims in the article that he was the "architect".	✘ No
The Guardian			Quote	✘ No
HuffPost Bio		~		✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
HuffPost article (Emanuel)	OpEd reply			✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
Devex			Quote	✘ No
Devex			Single mention	✘ No
Businesswire	Press release			✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
"Human capital contracts..."	Paper co-authored by Reddi			✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine, South Africa, Colorado, Maryland, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Disputed article about a researcher that fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG per the source assessment. Looks like one who may meet WP:GNG in the future. Per nom and previous AFD concern indicates WP:NPOL and needs rewriting from scratch! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He does not seem to have become an academic physician (one with a faculty position at a medical school), and I don't think his student publications rise to the level of WP:PROF (as they usually don't, and especially after filtering out the not-his publications from his badly curated or uncurated Google Scholar listing). That leaves WP:GNG and the source analysis above, which I find convincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]