Talk:Sweat lodge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sweat lodge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 20 days

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Reliable Sources

I believe the page on Sweat Lodge is very accurate, and well written in the tone appropriate to the content. The information about sweat lodge is an ORAL TRADITION that has been building for more than 10,000 years (40,000 if you include rest-of-world. Many lodges are built acording to the traditions of many teachers and many tribes, each of which may be considered equally reliable. If the article is to be improved by being more complete we might include references to Lakota and Cherokee traditions and even Mongolian.

About nudity, it can be easily misunderstood by outsiders. Normally we sweat with the men wearing shorts and the women wearing loose dresses. Sometimes I sweat nude with the men, and my wife sweats nude with the women, and only in places with lots of privacy around. RoyCout 15:47, 13 March 2007

Too protective of cultural practices

It's fine to note that the practice is a spiritual one with specific rituals linked to it, but to imply that it's dangerous if it isn't performed according to those traditions is dishonest. It's surely dangerous if precautions aren't taken but that has nothing to do with spirituality, culture or tradition. Prayers don't protect anyone from harm. Knowledge of dangerous medical conditions and the ability to recognize signs of distress do, and a white person with no knowledge of indigenous culture can learn this. The article is going too far in seeking to protect cultural practices from appropriation by making claims, in Wikipedia's voice, that are obviously untrue. 100.40.29.79 (talk) 00:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]