Jump to content

User talk:Feminist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
In The News recognition
Did You Know articles
This user An alternative to "helped" in the "This user helped..." description "Basic economy" An alternative to "become" in the "become a good article" description a good article on The date the article was promoted to Good Article (optional).
Good Articles contributed to
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by B-bot (talk | contribs) at 02:52, 1 May 2024 (Notification that File:TD Synnex logo.png is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page was last edited or modified by B-bot (talk · contribs · count · logs · email) on Wednesday 2:52:40 May 1, 2024 UTC.


9-1-1

Hi, thank you for acting as closer at this discussion. I'm a bit perplexed, however, by the close. You counted the votes 5-3, but reading the discussion, this is not the case:

Support:
User:kashmiri (OP, implied support)
User:Necrothesp
User:Walrasiad (weak support)
User:SmokeyJoe

Oppose:
User:162 etc.
User:Awesome Aasim (supported status quo, or 911)
User:Pppery
User:CookieMonster755

WP:CONSENSUS is not simply vote-counting. That being said, I'm not convinced that this discussion led to a consensus to move. 162 etc. (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing up the opinion of Awesome Aasim, I did misinterpret his comment supporting the move. I have updated my closure to reflect that.
Indeed, consensus is not vote-counting. That is why I also considered the strength of the arguments in my closure. As I stated in my closure, the "Oppose" arguments cited WP:NATURAL, but failed to make a case for why the use of an alternative name should be preferred over WP:PARENDIS for the article. Awesome Aasim in particular did not explain at all why he chose to Oppose having the disambiguation in the title. Therefore, I considered the oppose arguments to generally be weaker than the support arguments. feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Substack writers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Substack writers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improve Level 3 vital articles to Featured Article status

Hi, looks like an awesome challenge :) Signing up – I'm going to try my best to get Henry Ford up there. Thanks! TLA (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for offering another vital articles reward, only just noticed it! I think targeting level 3 but with the higher bar of featured status is a great idea. the wub "?!" 17:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Reliability of Urban Dictionary" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Reliability of Urban Dictionary has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18 § Reliability of Urban Dictionary until a consensus is reached. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 19:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Society VA5 talk page

Next time, when you make that many proposals at once, please make them subsections of one big talk page section. This is called a batch proposal. Having so many different sections on the page at once is a bit overwhelming, especially for users on mobile devices. For an example of a batch proposal, see this discussion. Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 17:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll restructure some of my proposals into batch proposals. Thanks. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@QuicoleJR: done, hope this makes the page easier to navigate. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"(- -)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect (- -) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § (- -) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Deplorable" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Deplorable has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Deplorable until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 06:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

kbitty :)

Heyallkatehere (talk) 07:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-cirio.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-cirio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TD Synnex logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TD Synnex logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Feminist&oldid=1221639351"