Talk:Table-oriented programming
This article was nominated for deletion on August 21, 2006. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Hoax?
Uncle G - a blast from the past. You looked into this in the deletion discussion in 2006. I just declined a G4 speedy on this because it's substantially different from the deleted version, but if this subject isn't a thing... Girth Summit (blether) 11:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because ... I was wondering if deletion would be reconsidered in light of the historical section (which I doubt was present on the previous edition, though I'm happy to be proved wrong); I was hoping that the historical section would indicate greater notability than previously assumed. I'd be happy with a "rename" (or even merge) consensus, but thought that, whether the name is right or not, at least the page content should be retained. Thanks! --TimNelson (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)