Jump to content

User talk:Got Milked

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AddMore-III (talk | contribs) at 06:37, 13 May 2024 (→Additional warning: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Got Milked! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Schoolhouse Rock

Hi, Got Milked! I've reverted your changes to Schoolhouse Rock! because we don't link every instance of a name in an article. Too many links takes away from the specialness! Though seriously, there's a manual of style for when to link. Take a look at MOS:LINK when you get a chance. Thanks for your work, and happy editing! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lin Zexu

Hi Got Milked. I'm reverting the section you added to First Opium War. There are two reasons. First, it is not properly cited (the website you've cited does not say most of what you've added to the section). Second, if you do have a source for the reverence of Lin Zexu (I don't doubt this) that should probably go in the Lin Zexu article or, at best, somewhere in the consequences of the opium war. It does not warrant a section on its own in this article. Please note that I don't doubt the information you have added. My concern is that this is not the appropriate place and that it is not properly cited. --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 12:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. :-) BTW, Maurice Collis, in his book, Foreign mud, also says a lot about Lin Zexu. Apparently he was already well known because of his work cleaning up corruption in the north (Manchuria, I think). A very interesting man. --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 21:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have the same issue in the Opium Wars article. Could you go ahead and make the same changes in that article as well? Thanks! --Regents Park (moult with my mallards) 02:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liu Xiang

Thanks for making this edit. I can't believe I didn't pick up that myself. Perhaps the original editor meant to say he was their first men's gold medallist on the track rather than athletics or track and field events in general. I'm not sure if that claim stands up...

In terms of the "unrevealed injury" at the 2008 Olympics, I'm not sure if that's exactly true. I'm pretty sure I remember my own (and the BBC commentator's) opinion was one of surprise that he was even on the start line in the first place (because of the general knowledge that he was injured), and the inevitable walk away when he couldn't run. I think it was the case that the Chinese had sought to underplay his injury in the outside hope that he could compete. I've no citations on this yet so maybe it's all just my own point of view. I'll have a look... Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 15:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Prefontaine, Olympic preview and Olympic heats reports seem to suggest my ideas are indeed quite plausible, but I guess it will always be a bit inconclusive. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 16:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dog meat

You seem like a well informed and open minded and impartial person. There are these individuals who are trying to control what is directly accessible in the Dog meat article, by deleting my logical and relevant linking of the Horse meat article in its See Also section. I can understand their need to maintain a certain level of white pride and Asian cultural-secessionism by disassociating certain European(and their close-ally/favorite Asian) taboo meat cultures/nations to make an outright disconnect in these taboo meat articles relative to dog meat, which most likely have their largest proportion of consumers in such places as China, Korea and Vietnam: whereas in cat and horse meat consumption, the partiality toward the eastern/central Asians to that of non-Asians is far less(and complicity with Europeans far more) and thus the "Wikipedia controllers" for white pride(and pride of their closest allies and "friendlies"), work to make or delete such edits. But this really has nothing to do with proper presentation of white people's eating habits or how the eating habits of western democracy's closest ally nations should be seen. The inclusion of horse meat in the See Also section should constitute a consistent and simple American(not necessarily objective) and all English-language reader-observation of relevant facts and comparative study to the culture of eating these animals to which American and other "democratized" people should objectively examine without feeling humiliated, like how the editors and Dog meat article-controllers here are doing here by omitting direct reader-access to these relevant articles for comparative examination. Of course, as difficult as it may be for them to accept, the link to horse meat and other relevant "taboo meats" will be included in the See Also section. KulqihanAtqa (talk) 06:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My response to the Dog meat article controversy and whether or not it is permissible or reasonable to include relative linking to the Horse meat and Whale meat articles, as posted on the Dog meat article's discussion page.
This is an interesting debate. My understanding of the See Also sections in all the Wikipedia articles is that it allows a bit more room and flexibility to touch on tangentially-related subjects that would otherwise seem inappropriate or off-topic if directly presented in the main body of the article. This dog meat article seem to be a food-related article, and reference to other similar foods would seem to make sense. See Also is not a hard rule to follow, suggesting only common sense in extending knowledge on the subject, which in this case is not about dogs per se, but the dog as a viable source of meat and protein; albeit an unusual choice for most people in the world. Horse meat is obviously another viable source of meat and protein and also an unusual food choice for most people in the world, which should be an appropriate reference in the See Also section of this food-related article. Whale meat as a source of meat protein should be treated the same, but obviously given special attention for the reason that some of them are vulnerable or endangered species, especially the blue whale; although I don't believe the Japanese or native Siberians and native north Americans, whom are the typical consumers of whale meat, have anything to do with the blue whale becoming over-hunted and endangered. It's interesting to note that even though people who follow Abrahamic religions may have hard rules on what animal meats they may or may not be eat, adherents of Pure Land Buddhism (typically China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam) and Tibetan Buddhism (also China, fairly commonly among the Han, Manchu, and Mongol ethnic groups) traditionally prohibit human consumption of cat, dog, and horse meats; whereas beef, pork, and poultry are usually permitted. But of course, the most devout adherents of Pure Land Buddhism will abstain from eating any meat animal. Most ethnic Tibetans, at least in the upper-classes, traditionally live in the extremes of the high plateaus where land is not so arable, and had traditionally sustained themselves with an animal meat diet. That's my two-dollars on this issue. Peace :o) Got Milked (talk) 19:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Babi02Dec2007.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Babi02Dec2007.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Babi02dec2007.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SilkAir Flight 185, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Sino-Japanese War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Senkaku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lin Huiyin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lin Huiyin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KIA and Lizhuang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zhu Binhou

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Draft:Zhu Binhou, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Etienne tsu. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Malaysian Airlines

Please dont edit war on Malaysian Airlines your addition has been challenged it is up to you to gain a consensus on the talk page not keep re-adding it, if you continue to add challenged content it may be seen as being disruptive, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zhu Binhou

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zhu Binhou, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A10: article exists in mainspace under Zhu Binhou

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. : Noyster (talk), 11:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Got Milked. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Got Milked. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of AfD debate

Hi, I am writing to inform you that an AfD debate has been initiated for the article Environmental inequality in Europe (formerly Environmental racism in Europe). Thanks, Sturgeontransformer (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Got Milked. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Transport International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Animal Welfare Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of George Floyd. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of aircraft used in China before 1937, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lu Yongxiang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I added a {{ill}} on Development of Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–1945) that you reverted. The template simply shows that an English article on Liu Tsui-kang [zh] does not exist. Just click on [zh], which will lead to zh:劉粹剛 on the Chinese Wikipedia. This way readers can see that English Wikipedia is missing that article, avoiding a WP:SURPRISE link to a foreign language project. If you would likemore information on the uses of {{ill}}, check the documentation page. Alternatively, I have previously clarified the use of the interlanguage link template on my talk page here. Vycl1994 (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gao Youxin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gao Youxin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bombing of Chongqing
added a link pointing to Operation Z
Development of Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–1945)
added a link pointing to Operation Z

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in context of the Imperial Japanese planning of the raid against the U.S. Pacific Fleet moored at Pearl Harbor in mid-late 1941 as the IJN were reassigning their China-bases unit to operations in the Pacific theater. Got Milked (talk) 09:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bombing of Chongqing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Z.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Imperial Japanese "Operation Z" as it pertains to the mission (against the U.S.) that saw of all the experienced Japanese Naval Air units, including all the A6M Zero squadrons withdrawn from the operations in China for the Empire of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. Got Milked (talk) 06:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lanzhou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Z.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Z; the planning stage of the Imperial Japanese strike against the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Got Milked (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Development of Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–1945), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guangxi Clique.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, may as well allow the reader to explore the disambiguation Got Milked (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey just FYI, DPL bot is a bot. Its not going to respond, it can’t understand you. Its not a human editor. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hey just FYI Luftwaffe and German Air Force are separate pages, your edit summary [1] indicates a misunderstanding of the matter. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Republic of China Air Force, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China Air Force

Please stop making personal attacks - I havn't removed any sources from the article - all I did was add sourced text, move 2 photos about and trim a non-neutral caption. If you want the article to be stable, there needs to be a sensible discussion on the article talk page about the History section, including a proper discussion about whether sources conform with WP:RS, what the purpose is of the large Chinese language quotations (this is the English language wikipedia after all) and whether all the additions are appropriate for a general overall article on the ROC Air Force.Nigel Ish (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruption at Republic of China Air Force

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of China Air Force. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—PaleoNeonate – 08:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gao Youxin

Information icon Hello, Got Milked. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gao Youxin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gao Youxin

Hello, Got Milked. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gao Youxin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Military World Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Spam on wiki

I hope I got it wrong, but I think you use references to distribute advertising messages or promote Chinese through reference.I will delete the blog first, hope you can explain what happened.--Rastinition (talk) 12:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Information icon Hello, I'm Hanyou23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2022 Winter Olympics seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In addition, using neutral sources is always the best for referencing.

February 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Winter Olympics. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits are tagged with "Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source". Please read here for more info [2]. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Military World Games.

The source globaltimes is not reliable.I noticed that other people have given you warnings, but the filter still triggers quite often, giving you a level 4 warning considering you've been active for a long time. Rastinition (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Wong Pan-yang

Notice

The article John Wong Pan-yang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability amid scattered minor mentions in a few books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic alert

Information icon You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. —Alalch E. 00:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Killing of Shani Louk appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted (edit: hasn't been due to 1RR). To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Alalch E. 17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about an addition by you to Colonel Tomb

There is a discussion on the talk page of Colonel Tomb Talk:Colonel_Tomb#Shot_in_Parachute_Claims about a statement that you added, in Wikipedia voice, that US Navy fighter pilots intentionally shot and killed pilots descending by parachute during the Vietnam war. Your presence in the discussion is welcome.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Duke Cunningham who is being apparently accused of this act, appears to be still alive and thus BLP applies here.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and tyvm for pointing that detail out. Upon further referencing the historic publication by István Toperczer (MiG ACES of the VIETNAM WAR, 2015, Library of Congress Control # 2015932137, pp. 174-175.), it's evident that the pilot(s) who made the strafing run(s) that killed MiG-17 pilot has remained anonymous; asides from testimony featured from the Vietnamese-side, and due to circumstantial evidence, it'd seem most-likely that the culprit(s) directly-involved in the killing/murder of MiG-17 pilot Do Hang was not one piloting an F-4J, but an A-7 Corsair II... and the edit to this account now accurately reflect the current status of this case of violation of the Additional to Protocol I of the 1949 Geneva Conventions for War Crimes. Got Milked (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional warning

You can edit any article in Wikipedia, but your edit you've made at the page Criticism of Judaism is considered as vandalism. If you continue to vandalize pages you will be blocked.

AddMore-III (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Got_Milked&oldid=1223605081"