Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Overall: Pass/Fail: