User talk:MarsVHS

This is MarsVHS's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: SyskeySeven (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grabup were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SyskeySeven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 16:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MarsVHS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 16:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024-05-17 - Teahouse

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

I have undone your recent edit to the Teahouse because it appeared to be retaliatory vandalism on account of your recent draft being declined. Being declined for lack of notability is not the same as not being real - there are plenty of things and people that are real that don't have Wikipedia articles. Refer to the prior links for further details.

Also, note that if you repeatedly vandalize or re-submit your draft, not only may you lose your editing privileges, but your draft topic may be salted to prevent you or others from re-submitting it without approval. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism at the Teahouse

Stop vandalising the Teahouse or you are likely to be blocked! Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 16:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NCORP

Registering a company does not make it notable; please read WP:NCORP. If you believe your company is notable, where is the news coverage of it? I don't think you are here to build Wikipedia but rather to vandalize it, as you did at Teahouse. You can be indefinitely blocked from editing for this type of behavior. See WP:NOTHERE. GrabUp - Talk 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read your emails MarsVHS (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The information is so easy to verify. Stop tryna play dumb, you know you can verify the information. MarsVHS (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=They're trying to mess with my company. They're deleting my acrticles because they dont believe my company is real. This can cause me financial lossMarsVHS (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

Who is deleting your articles? Who don't believe your company is not real? What kind of financial loss? GrabUp - Talk 16:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you guys. You're trying to mess with my company. If you cause me financial loss, i can take you to court for defamation. You're impeding on my business. MarsVHS (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now i cant resubmit my article because ur power hungry friends blocked me from making edits. You guys are interrupting my business MarsVHS (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to do Business, and how we interrupting your business, Lol. GrabUp - Talk 17:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By deleting articles about it? Ya'll are just bored trolls with nothing better to do than to harrass women online. MarsVHS (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not deleted, It is at the draft space, but not ready. GrabUp - Talk 17:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's ready MarsVHS (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sending me an email will not assist your attempts to create an article about your company, so please do not do that again. You have now broken a key rule here, namely no legal threats and can expect your account to be permanently blocked owing to that. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see, you're just tryna act power hungry. That's all you guys are doing.You think having a special role on here means you can just boss others around the whole time MarsVHS (talk) 17:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dude, ur so obsessed with me it's hilarious. You're such a big man tryna bully a girl into submission on the internet XD MarsVHS (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you have anything better to do than to bully women online? MarsVHS (talk) 17:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We didn't even know that you are a woman until you confessed it yourself. GrabUp - Talk 17:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marina is obviously a females name MarsVHS (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your name on Wikipedia is "MarsVHS", not Marina. How can we knew about you? GrabUp - Talk 17:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could yall remove the block already so i can resubmit my article? MarsVHS (talk) 17:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry miss but you have to wait until your block ends. GrabUp - Talk 17:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nah, yall put it there yall can remove it. I did nothing wrong ya'll are just tryna bully me because im new. Do you not have anything better to do with your time than to troll on wikipedia? Trolling on wikipedia is lame, some of us are actually tryna contribute positively here. MarsVHS (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you were here to contribute positively, you wouldn't have vandalized the Teahouse, which is the reason behind your account block. GrabUp - Talk 17:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what treehouse? What are u going on about MarsVHS (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you were here to contribute positively, you wouldn't be taking down my articles and getting me blocked just because you disagree with my article MarsVHS (talk) 17:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A polite report of a legal problem, such as defamation or copyright infringement, is not a threat and will be acted on quickly. Good job tryna scare people into submission tho MarsVHS (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any reference to legal proceedings that you imply you could or will act upon can cause a chilling effect. Hence, the rule WP:NLT is intended to keep you from scaring people into submission. Anyways, if it is so easy to verify, you are welcome to provide reliable sources to verify the notability of your company. No one here is under any obligation to do that for you. It seems like you may have a major misconception of what Wikipedia is. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're the ones tryna scare me into submission? You're literally threatening to get my whole account deleted if i don't do what you tell me to. MarsVHS (talk) 17:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i've provided several sources. Some of my sources are blocked from being posted. It will not let me post a link to the page where you can play our games. MarsVHS (talk) 17:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i literally have our website there as a source MarsVHS (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your own website is not a reliable and independent source. From the filter log, it appears that you tried to add a Facebook link, which is also not a reliable and independent source. So, that is why people are saying the sources are not good enough. Also, this is a private website, and people are only telling you to stop emailing them and stop disrupting other pages (like WP:TEA and Grabup's user page, as can be seen in your filter log). You seem to believe you have some right to be here, but actually, you opted into the site's terms and services when you registered an account. 142.245.193.2 (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its reliable, because it's our official page. It is independent as i'm my own person. How is the official website not reliable? MarsVHS (talk) 17:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IS and WP:RS would say otherwise. Your official page is not independent of you or your company. --ARose Wolf 17:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know what wp:is and wp:rs is, i literally made this account less than an hour ago. Ya'll expect me to know hundreds of rules when this is literally my first hour on this app and i'm already permanently blocked, that's really great. Way to bully someone into leaving this app. I was really looking forward to contributing on here, now i guess there's no reason to have an account so i guess this is goodbye. Hope you're happy, all your bullying worked. This account will be deleted within an hour. MarsVHS (talk) 17:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts can not be deleted. --ARose Wolf 17:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you will calm down and listen I will try to help you understand but at some point your talk page access may be blocked if you continue to say people are bullying you. --ARose Wolf 17:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't be calm when there's 4 people harrassing me tryna get my page taken down. I have autism and i can't handle arguments. My access is already blocked. I cant do anything MarsVHS (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Every editor is a human being, and we need to consider regularly whether our view/approach to an issue brings out the best of humanity or not." way to follow your own quote MarsVHS (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there were no terms when i signed up. MarsVHS (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every time you click "reply" there is a message at the bottom of the tool saying "By clicking "Reply", you agree to our Terms of Use...", etc. Just because you did not see that, does not mean it is not there. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a right to be here, we all have a right to be here, that's literally the whole reason this site was created? Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia with community contributions. I have no idea what wp:tea is, and i never edited grabups page? I'm a new user, you really gotta learn to cut people some slack. If i broke any rules it wasn't on purpose. I'm not aware of any rules for this site and i was never given any list of rules nor did i have to agree to any terms when i created an account. MarsVHS (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To provide an analogy, it appears to me (and possibly others) that you walked into a library, asked that your self-published book be put on the shelves, were told "We'll think about it", then threw a bunch of ketchup on the walls in response. Ignorance is not an excuse. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it's my fault yall are harrassing me? Mind explaining how. By posting an article draft i agreed to being harrassed? MarsVHS (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we keep following my analogy, what's going on here is that at least two librarians and multiple patrons have come up to you and asked you to stop throwing ketchup on the walls, or else to leave. I understand that it might feel like harassment, but everyone here is trying to help you understand or to protect Wikipedia. For reference: you going to Grabup's talk page and trying to blank it because of your draft being declined is harassment.

From my perspective, if you had just posted the article draft, it was declined, and then you quietly worked on it - none of this would have happened. This happened after you threw ketchup on the walls, not after you tried to get your book put on the shelves. 142.245.193.2 (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've literally not done anything MarsVHS (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never went to his page and blanked it? MarsVHS (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your filter log says otherwise. [1] 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

my filter log proves me right. I never messed with his page. I messed with the teahouse one, but i didn't realize i was breaking rules. As I mentioned before i have autism. MarsVHS (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"16:25, 17 May 2024: MarsVHS (talk | contribs) triggered an edit filter, performing the action "edit" on User talk:Grabup. Actions taken: Disallow; Filter description: New or unregistered user blanking someone else's user or user talk page"

This means that you attempted to blank his page. However, the system prevented you before you could. The intent was there.

And I have autism too. Please don't throw it around as an excuse for your actions. 142.245.193.10 (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt mean to? I was tryna leave a comment on his page? but as i said i have less than an hour on here so im still tryna figure all that out. MarsVHS (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this all literally happened just over a draft submission MarsVHS (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is also not true. [2] 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several other roblox game creation groups who have a page on wikipedia and no news articles. Just because there's no news articles doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Adopt me has it's own page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adopt_Me! MarsVHS (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page lists 32 different independent references, none of which are Facebook, Youtube, or the company website. Note how the company website is in the "external links" section instead. Your page lists your website and YouTube as the only two references, neither of which are independent. That is the difference. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ya'll could've just explained that to me instead of blocking me? MarsVHS (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were informed as to the requirements for page creation at :21, and instead of reading them and making corrections, you vandalized the Teahouse 8 minutes later. It is your own reaction that has led to this point. 142.245.193.10 (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you read their sources, you'll see all their sources are actually youtube. MarsVHS (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should have asked for help but you started to vandalise the Teahouse. GrabUp - Talk 17:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can yall help me get uhnblocked then MarsVHS (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vice News is not YouTube, so I do not know what you are talking about. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vice news is a known biased source MarsVHS (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a link to the internal Wikipedia discussion which defines Vice News as an unreliable source in this context? Otherwise, I cannot agree. 142.245.59.18 (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability has nothing to do with existence or even popularity. Notability is has a specific definition on Wikipedia. (WP:N - This link will take you to our policy on Notability and explain what it is. )

We do not recommend anyone come to the encyclopedia and immediately start creating article. It takes time to learn the rules and policies on Wikipedia.

Also, I've seen the word permanent thrown around to describe your block. Indefinite is not permanent. --ARose Wolf 17:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are trying to help you. --ARose Wolf 17:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like you're genuine. But these other guys are clearly not trying to help me they're just making things worse. When they threaten to get my whole account shut down just because i don't know the rules, do you think that's being helpful? MarsVHS (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Idefinite means without any limit of time or number. This means an idefinitie block means it'll last as long as they keep it on. And judging by how everyones coming at me it'll be forever. I make one mistake without realizing it and all of a sudden i have a whole mob after me. I just wanted to be a contributing member MarsVHS (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the rules state i can't email you. Maybe don't have your email connected? MarsVHS (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so then your group is just a lie then? MarsVHS (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im not making disruptive edits? MarsVHS (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

they're harrassing me. i've literally done nothing wrong. all i did was publish a draft MarsVHS (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And then repeatedly vandalise the Teahoouse, issued a legal threat and then doubled down on said threat, cast aspersions on people who are trying to explain things to you in good faith, and overall dismissed any valid criticism of your behaviour. Nobody's going to buy the "Everybody is so mean to me" claim when all the receipts from the toxicity point to you, not GrabUp or anyone else who's had the patience of a saint trying to help you. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

threatening me is not actring in good faith. Getting my perms completely taken away is not acting in good faith. How did i vandalise someething? MarsVHS (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are they trying to help me? They're clearly trying to bully me into submission MarsVHS (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don’t know anything about Wikipedia’s rules, you should ask experienced editors or admins, not start vandalizing and threatening legal action. Now you are indefinitely blocked. If you don’t stop commenting, you might get another block, after which you won’t be able to request an unblock or comment anything here. GrabUp - Talk 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

when did i vanadlize? MarsVHS (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see, you're trying to bully me into submission MarsVHS (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of blocking me, ya'll could've jsut helped me MarsVHS (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They were. The answers they were giving you did not match the answers you already had in mind. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SyskeySeven

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SyskeySeven, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]