Jump to content

Numerology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skyerise (talk | contribs) at 22:50, 20 May 2024 (Aleister Crowley: ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Numerorum mysteria (1591), a treatise on numerology by Pietro Bongo and his most influential work in Europe[1]

Numerology (known before the 20th century as arithmancy) is the belief in an occult, divine or mystical relationship between a number and one or more coinciding events. It is also the study of the numerical value, via an alphanumeric system, of the letters in words and names. When numerology is applied to a person's name, it is a form of onomancy. It is often associated with astrology and other divinatory arts.[2]

The term numerologist can be used for those who place faith in numerical patterns and draw inferences from them, even if those people do not practice traditional numerology. For example, in his 1997 book Numerology: Or What Pythagoras Wrought (Dudley 1997), mathematician Underwood Dudley uses the term to discuss practitioners of the Elliott wave principle of stock market analysis.

Etymology

The term arithmancy is derived from two Greek words – arithmos (meaning number) and manteia (meaning divination). "Αριθμομαντεία" Arithmancy is thus the study of divination through numbers.[3] Although the word "arithmancy" dates to the 1570s,[4] the word "numerology" is not recorded in English before c. 1907.[5]

History

The practice of gematria, assigning numerical values to words and names and imputing those values with religious meaning, dates back to antiquity. An Assyrian inscription from the 8th century BC, commissioned by Sargon II declares "the king built the wall of Khorsabad 16,283 cubits long to correspond with the numerical value of his name."[6] Rabbinic literature used gematria to interpret passages in the Hebrew Bible.

The practice of using alphabetic letters to represent numbers developed in the Greek city of Miletus, and is thus known as the Milesian system.[7] Early examples include vase graffiti dating to the 6th century BCE.[8] Aristotle wrote that the Pythgoraean tradition, founded in the 6th century by Pythagoras of Samos, practiced isopsephy,[9] the Greek predecessor of Hebrew gematria. Pythagoras was a contemporary of the philosophers Anaximander, Anaximenes, and the historian Hecataeus, all of whom lived in Miletus, across the sea from Samos.[10] The Milesian system was in common use by the reign of Alexander the Great (336–323 BCE) and was adopted by other cultures during the subsequent Hellenistic period.[7] It was officially adopted in Egypt during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (284–246 BCE).[7]

In 325 AD, following the First Council of Nicaea, departures from the beliefs of the state church were classified as civil violations within the Roman Empire. Numerology, referred to as isopsephy, remained in use in conservative Greek Orthodox circles.[citation needed]

Some alchemical theories were closely related to numerology. For example, Arab alchemist Jabir ibn Hayyan (died c. 806−816) framed his experiments in an elaborate numerology based on the names of substances in the Arabic language.[11]

Numerology is prominent in Sir Thomas Browne's 1658 literary discourse The Garden of Cyrus. Throughout its pages, the author attempts to demonstrate that the number five and the related quincunx pattern can be found throughout the arts, in design, and in nature – particularly botany.[citation needed]

Methods

Alphanumeric systems

There are various numerology systems which assign numerical value to the letters of an alphabet. Examples include the Abjad numerals in Arabic, Hebrew numerals, Armenian numerals, and Greek numerals. The practice within Jewish tradition of assigning mystical meaning to words based on their numerical values, and on connections between words of equal value, is known as gematria.[12]

The Mandaean number alphasyllabary is also used for numerology (Mandaic: gmaṭ aria). The Book of the Zodiac is an important Mandaean text on numerology.[13]

Pythagorean method

In the Pythagorean method (which uses a kind of place-value for number-letter attributions, as does the ancient Hebrew and Greek systems), the letters of the modern Latin alphabet are assigned numerical values 1 through 9.[14]

Agrippan method

Agrippa's numerology table as published in Three Books of Occult Philosophy

Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa applied the concept of arithmancy to the classical Latin alphabet in the 16th century in Three Books of Occult Philosophy. He mapped the letters as follows (in accordance with the Latin alphabet's place-value at that time):[15]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
K L M N O P Q R S
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
T V[a] X Y Z I[b] V[c] HI[d] HV[e]
  1. ^ When representing the u sound, as in Ulysses
  2. ^ When representing the j sound, as in John
  3. ^ When representing the v sound, as in Valentine
  4. ^ When representing the j sound, as in Jerome
  5. ^ When representing the w sound, as in Wilhelm

Note that the letters U, J, and W were not commonly considered part of the Latin alphabet at the time.

Chaldean method

A lesser known method, more popular in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, is the Chaldean method; in this context, "Chaldean" is an old-fashioned name for the Aramaic languages. In the Chaldean method number 9 is not used in the calculations, at least in practice. It is left out because it is thought to be divine and sacred, and therefore unassignable.

This method is radically different from the Pythagorean (as well as both the ancient Greek and Hebrew systems) as letters are assigned values based on equating Latin letters with letters of the Hebrew alphabet in accordance with sound equivalents (then number associations being derived via its gematria) rather than applying the ancient system of place-value used by the Hebrew and Greek gematria (although 'place-value' is almost universally interpreted in the ancient world according to units, tens and hundreds, which nonetheless have the same digital root as place value); in consequence of this there are several slightly different versions, there being disagreements over some of the letter-sound equivalents.[16]

Angel numbers

Angel numbers, as defined by Doreen Virtue and Lynnette Brown in 2005, are numbers consisting of repeating digits, such as 111 or 444.[17] As of 2023, a number of popular media publications have published articles suggesting that these numbers have numerological significance.[18]

English systems

There are various systems of English numerology, sometimes referred to as English Qabalah,[19] that are related to Hermetic Qabalah. These systems interpret the letters of the Roman script or English alphabet via an assigned set of numerological significances.[20][21] The spelling "English Qaballa", on the other hand, refers specifically to a Qabalah supported by a system discovered by James Lees in 1976.

John Skelton

The first system of English gematria was used by the poet John Skelton in 1523 in his poem "The Garland of Laurel".[22]

Willis F. Whitehead

The next reference to an English gematria found in the literature was made by Willis F. Whitehead in 1899 in his book, The Mystic Thesaurus, in which he describes a system he called "English Cabala".[23]

Aleister Crowley

In 1904, Aleister Crowley wrote out the text of the foundational document of his world-view, known as Liber AL vel Legis, The Book of the Law. In this text was the injunction found at verse 2:55; "Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet, thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto" which was understood by Crowley as referring to an English Qabalah yet to be developed or revealed.[24] In one of the Holy Books of Thelema written by Aleister Crowley in 1907, called Liber Trigrammaton, sub figura XXVII -- Being the Book of the Mutations of the Tao with the Yin and the Yang,[25] are 27 three-line diagrams known as 'trigrams', which are composed of a solid line for the Yang, a broken line for the Yin, and a point for the Tao. By attributing 26 Roman script letters to the trigrams of this work, Crowley felt that he had fulfilled the injunction to "obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet", as noted in his 'Old Comment' to The Book of the Law.[24] However, he also wrote that "The attribution in Liber Trigrammaton is good theoretically; but no Qabalah of merit has risen therefrom."[26]

John Hughes

In 1952, John P. L. Hughes published The Hidden Numerical Significance of the English Language, or, Suggestive Gematria, based on his lecture delivered at Holden Research Circle on July 4, 1952.[27]

James Lees

English Qaballa (EQ) refers to a system of Hermetic Qabalah that interprets the letters of the English alphabet via an assigned set of values discovered by James Lees in 1976. Like many of the English systems developed since the death of Aleister Crowley (1875–1947), it was created with the intent of gaining a better understanding of the mysteries elaborated in his inspired works, especially those in Liber AL vel Legis, the Book of the Law. According to Jake Stratton-Kent, "the English Qaballa is a qabalah and not a system of numerology. A qabalah is specifically related to three factors: one, a language; two, a 'holy' text or texts; three, mathematical laws at work in these two."[28][12]

William Eisen

A system related to the Spiritualist Agasha Temple of Wisdom was described by William Eisen in his two volume The English Cabalah (1980–82).[29][30][31]

William Gray

William G. Gray proposes another system in his 1984 book, Concepts of Qabalah,[32] more recently republished as Qabalistic Concepts.[33] This system includes correspondence attributions of the English letters to the positions on the Tree of Life.

Michael Bertiaux

Michael Bertiaux described a system called Angelic Gematria in his The Voudon Gnostic Workbook (1989).[34]

R. Leo Gillis

Another system for English known as Trigrammaton Qabalah (TQ) was first published by R. Leo Gillis in 1996,[35] and subsequently released as The Book of Mutations in 2002.[35] This system is based on one of the Holy Books of Thelema written by Aleister Crowley in 1907, called Liber Trigrammaton, sub figura XXVII -- Being the Book of the Mutations of the Tao with the Yin and the Yang.[35] Liber Trigrammaton (aka Liber XXVII) was called by Crowley "the ultimate foundation of the highest theoretical qabalah".[36] Correspondences are created with some of the major forms of divination such as the I Ching, Tarot and runes, as well as Greek and Hebrew alphabets, the Tree of Life, Western and Vedic astrology, magic squares, and the Platonic solids. A primary feature of this qabalah is a new understanding of the Cube of Space and its 26 components of edges, faces, and vertices, which equal the number of letters in the English alphabet.[37]

David Rankine

David Rankine described a system of English gematria[38] using prime numbers which he calls Prime Qabalah in his book Becoming Magick (2004).[39]

Scientific theories are sometimes labeled "numerology" if their primary inspiration appears to be a set of patterns rather than scientific observations. This colloquial use of the term is quite common within the scientific community and it is mostly used to dismiss a theory as questionable science.[citation needed]

The best known example of "numerology" in science involves the coincidental resemblance of certain large numbers that intrigued mathematical physicist Paul Dirac, mathematician Hermann Weyl and astronomer Arthur Stanley Eddington.[40] These numerical coincidences refer to such quantities as the ratio of the age of the universe to the atomic unit of time, the number of electrons in the universe, and the difference in strengths between gravity and the electric force for the electron and proton.[41] (See also Fine-tuned universe).

Wolfgang Pauli was also fascinated by the appearance of certain numbers, including 137 (a prime number), in physics.[42]

British mathematician I. J. Good wrote:

There have been a few examples of numerology that have led to theories that transformed society: see the mention of Kirchhoff and Balmer in Good (1962), p. 316 [...] and one can well include Kepler on account of his third law. It would be fair enough to say that numerology was the origin of the theories of electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, gravitation. [...] So I intend no disparagement when I describe a formula as numerological.

When a numerological formula is proposed, then we may ask whether it is correct. [...] I think an appropriate definition of correctness is that the formula has a good explanation, in a Platonic sense, that is, the explanation could be based on a good theory that is not yet known but 'exists' in the universe of possible reasonable ideas.[43]

See also

References

Citations

  1. ^ Valeri 1971.
  2. ^ Carroll 2003.
  3. ^ Francis-Cheung 2006, p. 31.
  4. ^ "arithmancy (n.)". etymonline.com.
  5. ^ "Home : Oxford English Dictionary". oed.com. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  6. ^ Luckenbill 1927, pp. 43, 65.
  7. ^ a b c Halsey 1967.
  8. ^ Jeffrey 1961.
  9. ^ Acevedo 2020, p. 50.
  10. ^ Riedweg 2005.
  11. ^ Newman n.d.
  12. ^ a b Stratton-Kent 1988b.
  13. ^ Häberl 2023.
  14. ^ Christie 2005, pp. 10–11.
  15. ^ Agrippa 1651, pp. 235–236.
  16. ^ Thompson 1999.
  17. ^ Virtue & Brown 2005.
  18. ^ Somer et al. 2023.
  19. ^ Nema 1995, pp. 24–25.
  20. ^ Hulse 2000, p. [page needed].
  21. ^ Rabinovitch & Lewis 2004, p. 269.
  22. ^ Walker 1998, pp. 33–42.
  23. ^ Whitehead 1899.
  24. ^ a b Crowley 1974, p. [page needed].
  25. ^ Crowley 1983.
  26. ^ Crowley quoted in Grant 1973, p. 59.
  27. ^ Hughes 1952.
  28. ^ Stratton-Kent 1988, p. 17.
  29. ^ Eisen 1980; Eisen 1982.
  30. ^ Mast 1991, p. [page needed].
  31. ^ Lawrence 2019, p. [page needed].
  32. ^ Gray 1984.
  33. ^ Gray 1997.
  34. ^ Bertiaux 1989. Republished as Bertiaux 2007.
  35. ^ a b c Weiser Antiquarian Books n.d.
  36. ^ Crowley 1983, p. [page needed].
  37. ^ Gillis 2013.
  38. ^ Drury 2006, p. 244.
  39. ^ Rankine 2004.
  40. ^ Gamow 1968.
  41. ^ Stenger 2004.
  42. ^ Falk 2009.
  43. ^ Good 1990, p. 141.

Works cited

Further reading