Talk:Creatine

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creatine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Dietary Supplements High‑importance

	Creatine is part of WikiProject Dietary Supplements, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to dietary supplements. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Dietary SupplementsWikipedia:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsTemplate:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsDietary supplement
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals: Core High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is prone to spam. Please monitor the References and External links sections.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 4 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pearl.emokaro (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JJJ7171.

Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 10 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Prad8960 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Prad8960 (talk) 02:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is creatine as same as steroids?

Is creatine as same as steroids? 60.243.208.198 (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, creatine is not a steroid. 109.48.2.151 (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proportion of the 3 aminoacids?

I can't find any article online that specify the proportion between the 3 amino acids. If methionine is "an additional requirement", it implies that its proportion in the creatine is low. If someone can find something, put a link on this paragraph in the article.

"Creatine is not an essential nutrient. It is an amino acid derivative, naturally produced in the human body from the amino acids glycine and arginine, with an additional requirement for S-Adenosyl methionine (a derivative of methionine) to catalyze the transformation of guanidinoacetate to creatine." 37.181.51.115 (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It takes one of each of them. The portions that come from glycine and arginine are color-coded in the image just below the paragraph you were reading. And SAM is just a carrier of the methyl group (see the "SAM cycle" section of the article for that amino acid for more information). DMacks (talk) 22:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kidney Function/Safety

The first sentence under the Renal Function section says "Long-term creatine supplementation has not been proven safe for kidney patients." The provided reference for this paraphrased comment is an article from Current Sports Medicine Reports written in 2002.

Subsequently, we've had decades of research. For example, the next paragraph which discusses a systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 published by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc., which found that "creatine supplementation does not induce renal damage in the studied amounts and durations".

Relative to this and an abundance of more recent articles & research, the 2002 reference is very dated, a relatively weak reference to begin with (not a scientific study; not a direct quote), and consequently seems undue as the first sentence in the section.

Can we let the latest research speak for itself, or perhaps find a much more recent, highly credible/reliable source and provide a more direct quotation on the topic of safety for people with preexisting kidney problems? -- Kalem014 (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]