Talk:San Juan College

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).

Headcount and FTE Table

Documenting events to-date should dispute resolution be required.

I have attempted to insert and retain a table that documents the institution's headcount and FTE numbers over the past years. This is statistical information that is of interest to a wide audience (e.g., faculty, students, taxpayers, etc.), and represents the historical growth (or shrinkage) of its operations.

This kind of statistical information is acceptable and in accordance with Wikipedia:College and university article advice.

For reference, this information is taken (and properly cited) from U.S. government survey records, but it is not simply a 're-hash' of an existing post: this information is not readily accessible or discoverable without some digging, and it is never aggregated in any way that allows for year-to-year comparison or trending.

The reverter cites Wikipedia:NOTCATALOG, but that discussion is not relevant to this information, and to-date the reverter has not attempted to engage in a discussion to clearly explain their position. 4CornersGuy (talk) 06:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]