Talk:Google Scholar

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bibliographies Top‑importance

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Websites: Computing High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Google Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google Scholar. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google Scholar at the Reference desk.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.nature.com/news/google-scholar-pioneer-on-search-engine-s-future-1.16269

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Not as good as described in this article

It seems that google scholar is not as good as described in this article. A perfect paper on the subject matter is written here You can check it out for yourself, what is written is really true. Would it thus be possible to include a milder version of my critic on this wikipedia page, like it exists in the German version of this article, without having it deleted? I thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.39.218.10 (talk • contribs) .

The German article referred to is aat http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar

would 194.39.218.10 please give some contact information? ---

I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be highly biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.202.42.70 (talk • contribs) .

"Google Scholar and academic libraries" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Google Scholar and academic libraries and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Google Scholar and academic libraries until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of contribution of family institution towards to children socialization.

I need a research report of that title 197.250.224.160 (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search engine optimization for Google Scholar

Is the section Search engine optimization for Google Scholar really required or useful? I don't believe so, but I would like to consult other Wikipedians first. I can do stuff! (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With citations explain flexibility as the key difference between traditional and results based monitoring

With citations and examples explain flexibility as the key difference between traditional and results based monitoring 41.222.178.12 (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]