Talk:The Illuminati Papers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I changed this page in a few important ways:

Included the Historical Illuminatus and called it most appropriately considered aqdjunct.
Eliminated the sentence that implied that The Illuminatti Papers really was more properly adjunct to Illuminatus! than his other works.
Took off the quotes. I have it on good authority that quotes do not belong around book titles (learned such from a a GED instructor, who works at Portland State University)

Proposed merge with Guerrilla ontology

This topic (Guerrilla ontology) isn't notable on its own. Pburka (talk) 03:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say keep it now, as I've brought it back to its original intent and accurate description by removing some of the sentences objected to on the talk page as well as by 'citation needed' requests from 2011. The topic is notable in that Wilson describes it as the purpose of all his books, down to every page of all his books. I didn't know that, but it makes sense. The 'Guerrilla ontology' page is also now one of the few items in the "Life" section of the new Robert Anton Wilson template put up today, which I'm adding to from a Wikipedia search. So keeping it as an article of its own seems appropriate. Randy Kryn 3:03 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Are there any sources, beyond primary sources, which discuss guerrilla ontology? Pburka (talk) 03:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have no idea, but a Bing search brings up many mentions, several websites using the name, and there's even a band with the name. It looks through that search that the term has seeped into some areas of society. But I can't say anything further than that on sources, just giving my opinion about merging what seems to be a good page relating to Robert Anton Wilson. Randy Kryn 3:51 8 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Illuminati Papers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613011108/http://whywork.org/rethinking/whywork/rawilson.html to http://www.whywork.org/rethinking/whywork/rawilson.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]