Jump to content

Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Magentic Manifestations (talk | contribs) at 18:16, 9 July 2024 (→References). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.

Prose

  • Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. checkY

References

  • References are formatted correctly. checkY
  • External links appropriate. checkY
  • No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. checkY

Sources check, numbers based on this revision:

  • [1] checkY
  • [2] checkY
  • [5] Orange tickY Date given is inconsistent and the source for this information does not look great. 1975 looks to be the correct year which agrees with this site and [6]. Modified the source
  • [6] checkY
  • [13] checkY
  • [37] checkY
  • [47] Orange tickY Not a very strong source, primary research only cited once. There is a possible better reference from C. J. Stevenson here. Added the source
  • [57] ☒N Self-published source on a blog. Better references are available. Removed the source and tweaked the sentence
  • [77] checkY

Images

  • All images are tagged with licenses. checkY
  • Orange tickY The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
  • Orange tickY There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.

Stability, neutrality, focus

  • There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either. checkY
  • Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. checkY
  • Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. checkY
  • Orange tickY The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. [[MOS:|MoS]] () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Madras_Crocodile_Bank_Trust/GA1&oldid=1233556373"