User talk:Asumathi005

User voted web polls are not allowed

March 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Thaanaa Serndha Koottam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot to add the citation Asumathi005 (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kalvan (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lal Salaam (2024 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Aranmanai 4, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudhran. You are continuing to use a free website as a source, please read the Reliable Sources page and only use good, reliable sources. Information like what you are adding needs to come from a secondary source, not the company itself anyway. Articles should be based on what secondary sources think is notable. Ravensfire (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 00:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Tauba Tera Jalwa have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 06:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Rangasamudra, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Charliehdb (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Thookudurai. Charliehdb (talk) 13:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Local Sarakku. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Charliehdb (talk) 13:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Upadhyaksha. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Charliehdb (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Vadakkupatti Ramasamy. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Charliehdb (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Marakkuma Nenjam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Charliehdb (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links Rotten Tomatoes

Please note WP:ELDUP. Articles that already included Rotten Tomatoes in the Reception section do not need to include it again in the External links section. Some editors like to include it twice but the guidelines for external links section discourages such duplication and the guidelines does not include Rotten Tomatoes on the list of recommended exceptions either. -- 109.79.169.204 (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]