Jump to content

Talk:Abdullah Öcalan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 12:38, 2 August 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Abdullah Öcalan/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Political Prisoner

So, Abdullah Ocalan has been identified as a political criminal. İs he in prison just for he is communist or something. No he is not. So if he is political prisoner ( while he murdered womans childerens, he doesnt deny it, he raid villages, he kill soldiers, he blow up outposts. No doubt in that ) dthen nazis are meant to be considered as political prisoner (while they kill many people. No doubt in that). They both not political prisoners. They are murdered people. Thats why they punished. And Ocalan punished for his murders and crimes. İf we say " Ocalan is a political prisoner" it will be hypocrasy and a example of unobjektive. While everybody knows that kill people we cant say he is a political prisoners Turkish SpongeBob (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He have had this discussion before. As far as I am aware of he was banned from politics for life so he is a political prisoner, not only a political prisoner, but also. Then a politician from the Turkish Government called him a political prisoner themselves see here. Then numerous Nobel laureates also referred to him as a political prisoner see here. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Guy literally founded a terrorist group that bombs civilians. Operated his armed attacks on both civilian and Turkish soldiers to idea of seperation of Turkey and founding Kurdistan as the main goal. He literally rejected from almost every country he is trying to seek political asylum. He is clearly a terrorist and even the European governments had to let Turkey arrest and have every right to execute him. Nobody cares if some author called him as political prisoner. That's an opinion not a fact. With your argument we can easily argue that Bin Laden was a political leader and a which is not he is the most famous for, is it? So Abdullah Öcalan should be labeled and called as a terrorist. He acted terrorist actions, founded armed terrorist group, planned suicide bombers and attacks on civilians, etc. Wow such a political prisoner. sebci (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can find many sources that says He is a terorist. What makes Nobel, a Trusted source. What I am saying is very clear and known to everyone. How can this man be a political criminal when no one denies that Öcalan raided villages, killed people and killed soldiers? He even writes in his own book that he raided villages and killed people. If someone did the same thing in America, they would be executed. TurkeyWhat I am saying is very clear and known to everyone. How can this man be a political criminal when no one denies that Öcalan raided villages, killed people and killed soldiers? He even writes in his own book that he raided villages and killed people. So there is court reports. While anybody doesnt look court reports, why we have to trust Nobel organization. Turkish SpongeBob (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to some Turks, Abdullah Öcalan was named "Artin Agopyan" and had connections to Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA). 155.137.27.93 (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really pretend that we consider "some Turks" as a reliable source? Otherwise, this is just speculative and might be labelled as WP:FORUM. Please stick to reliable sources, thank you. PedroAcero76 (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is ok. It is only an accusation. 155.137.27.93 (talk) 13:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this content split? This content can be adequately covered within the parent biography given the secondary sources provided. czar 12:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: It appears to duplicate a lot of the scope from democratic confederalism. In fact, it seems like it lifted a lot of the text in the first few paragraphs from there, albeit slightly rewritten. I'd say democratic confederalism is probably a better target for merging, if it's truly necessary. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good czar 15:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirected to Democratic confederalism czar 01:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 August 2024

The PKK is internationally recognised as a terrorist organisation, not simply a militant organisation. AverageTurk (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Cullen328 (talk) 18:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. Cullen328 (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]