Talk:Transgender
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transgender article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about transgender people. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about transgender people at the Reference desk. |
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 May 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the visual anchor for the transfeminine to not include the transmasculine anchor.
Change the transmasculine definition to include a visual anchor.
This can be seen in the diff-like below:
< ''{{visanc|Transfeminine|Transmasculine}}'' is a term for any person, binary... --- > ''{{visanc|Transfeminine}}'' is a term for any person, binary or non-binary... < ''Transmasculine'' refers to a person, binary or non-binary... --- > ''{{visanc|Transmasculine}}'' refers to a person, binary or non-binary...
Serxka (talk) 08:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done Raladic (talk) 15:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Dead link
The "main article" link in #Pride symbols doesn't work. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like the LGBT symbols page doesn't sort based on identity but based on type of symbols (gender symbols, flags, plants & animals, etc.). I imagine the best fix may be to put LGBT symbols as a see also, without a section tag? Or just call it a main page even though it discusses other pride symbols?
- --Malvoliox (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Text about Thomasine Hall
Currently the article states that One of the earliest recorded transgender people in America was Thomas(ine) Hall, a seventeenth century colonial servant
. I cannot verify the source this is cited to as I do not have access to it. However, our article on Thomasine Hall does not describe them as a transgender person. I'd suggest either removing the reference to Hall or rephrasing. Maybe to "one of the earliest recorded gender nonconforming individuals in America"? Or some other sort of phrasing indicating that Hall was intersex? I'm not sure what the best solution is here. Other people's perspectives are welcome. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think Thomasine Hall warrants a mention in the article, but did not identify as transgender, so the wording likely needs to be changed. Perhaps begin with description of their abnormal gender expression, then add that some have drawn connections to modern trans identities? Love, Cassie. (Talk to me!) 01:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've changed the text to read "gender nonconforming" for now. [1] Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since the point is to highlight the historical fact of "a trans person existing", it seems important that the person actually be trans? ViolanteMD (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've changed the text to read "gender nonconforming" for now. [1] Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
International Journal of Transgender Health
Maybe it's just me, but the content about the International Journal of Transgender Health changing its name feels slightly out of place no matter how I rearrange it. I think it's because the terminology section is otherwise focused. Highlighting this specific example feels like it breaks the flow but I don't want to remove it without further feedback. One possible alternative would be listing other journals that have changed with the times so it isn't the only example. Alternatively, a general statement that LGBT+ journals/organizations have changed their names to reflect modern use, if that can be cited to a good source. Thoughts? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I can't find a citable RS for an example other than the one used. I would suggest either striking it (which would make me sad) or specifying it as an example. For instance,
As an example, the International Journal of Transgenderism changed its name to the International Journal of Transgender Health in 2020 "to reflect a change toward more appropriate and acceptable use of language in our field."
I just don't have a better idea. The flow is still a bit stilted no matter what. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC) - This is the Transgender article and the quote about the Journal of Transgender Health having changed its name is importantly in this terminology section as the journal is considered the core of research on transgender health and highlighting the change from the now outdated term of Transgenderism.
- It’s specifically about the terminology as the first sentence of that section explains since the now outdated term is nowadays often used pejoratively. Raladic (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know that this is the transgender article and that this section is about terminology. My point is that this example stands out and doesn't easily fit with the rest of what's written in the section. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We could move it up closer to the start of the section that explains why the outdated term is no longer used, so it will stand closer to the context for which it is in the section to begin with. Raladic (talk) 21:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just moved it up now and I think in that paragraph now it reads more contextual, which was the point of it’s inclusion. Raladic (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. I don't think this solves the problem at all. It breaks up the chronological history about terminology to put undue emphasis on a specific example. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- You know what? I've changed my mind. Somehow reading it a third time sounds better. The next section is about the transgender community more broadly so I suppose it doesn't break the flow. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. I don't think this solves the problem at all. It breaks up the chronological history about terminology to put undue emphasis on a specific example. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just moved it up now and I think in that paragraph now it reads more contextual, which was the point of it’s inclusion. Raladic (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We could move it up closer to the start of the section that explains why the outdated term is no longer used, so it will stand closer to the context for which it is in the section to begin with. Raladic (talk) 21:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know that this is the transgender article and that this section is about terminology. My point is that this example stands out and doesn't easily fit with the rest of what's written in the section. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Discrimination Section.
I noticed that the source on the opening paragraph of the Discrimination and Support section dates back to 2011, 13 years ago. I feel as though this may not be up to date enough for users who are looking for rough figures of transgender discrimination. It states that 26% of trans people have been fired on the grounds that they were transgender, however I feel as though this is no longer accurate
I am not trying to compromise the neutrality of the article - by updating the paragraph to include statistics above or below the current ones in the article, but I am wondering if anybody has an up-to-date source to better the article's accuracy? I'm sure there is one out there. ChillyDude153198 (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your concern is valid, but I am unable to find a newer source with real statistics. However, I don't have access to deeper, academic sources (better said as 'I don't have the money to pay for them'). Until a better source is found, I am rephrasing the statement to highlight the stale data. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Last1in Plenty of scholarly sources on WP:TWL for free (t · c) buidhe 02:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- If I get my hands on a British Library card any time soon, and remember, I'll give you some more up-to-date sources for the section. ChillyDude153198 (talk) 16:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Top-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Old requests for LGBTQ+ studies peer review
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- Top-importance Gender studies articles
- Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Unknown-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles