Jump to content

User talk:Man vyi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Shhhnotsoloud (talk | contribs) at 07:55, 7 August 2024 (Notification: listing of Catchment area (disambiguation) at WP:Articles for deletion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

/Archive 1

[edit]

Hi, I see you removed my link from the external references section of the Guernsey page below...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guernsey

I can assure you the link is not spam, and I believe it certainly has as much relevance as many of the other links.

I would be happy to discuss futher.

Earlymorning (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example: http://www.allaboutguernsey.com which is just paid (and scraped) company listings. Which I would consider far less useful to people wanting to know about Guernsey than http://www.find.gg

But perhaps you are right, certainly we plan to make money from the site. I thought the usefulness and fresh content would make it worth linking to for people interested in Guernsey.

Earlymorning (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Value-Added-Tax-free imports from the Channel Islands

[edit]

Thanks for your input. Good to see someone who doesn't confuse dodgy tax fiddling with national pride. Bigbrothersback (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slight problem with the rip off Britain reference. This is tabloid hype. A Which? report last year pointed out the UK had the cheapest CD and DVD prices in Europe. I'm not sure if this is online. If I can find it I'll add it. Rip Off Britain is often used to justify tax dodging, a bit like 'those immigrants took all our jobs' Bigbrothersback (talk) 10:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Well perhaps, but I would not say more so than several of the other external links on that page - yet they have not been removed.

Earlymorning (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey references

[edit]

Greetings,

I was wondering if you could help with the article on Jersey as far as references are concerned (using the citation templates).

God bless you,

Grumpy Troll (talk) 13:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have pretty much taken care of the history section (its references should be transferred to the main article), but I am somewhat unable to provide many references for information in the politics and culture sections, added to which the politics section could do with a knowledgeable rewrite.
God bless you,
Grumpy Troll (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blampied stamps

[edit]

Thanks for reinserting the image of the stamps. Ah1954 17:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Man vyi! I've asked a question on Talk:Narrow Water Castle. As I've seen you have made the foto, so you will most probably know: Would you please mind answering my question? Just a short answer here or even better on the talk-page would be great. Thanks --Rheinländer 13:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Jersey

[edit]

In the Battle of Jersey wiki page it states that there was a Jerseyman who was arrested in the aftermath. Knowing you are a history buff do you have any idea who, I can't find it anywhere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.20.183.38 (talk) 09:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Found it, it was a Le Geyt!

Crown Dependency

[edit]

I have revised the relationship with the crown section of the Crown Dependency page to more accurately examine the complex feudal relationship between the King of England and King of France when the King of England was equal to and was also the subordinate of the King of France due to his position as Duke of Normandy and Acquitaine and the position of the Channel Islands who remain loyal to the rightful 'Duke of Normandy' even though he has subsequently given up claim to the title.

Knowing you have a great interest in these things, perhaps you will just check over and make sure I am being impartial etc.

Cheers. Darius —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.20.183.38 (talk) 10:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Evolution of the Bailiff

[edit]

Sorry Man Vyi, been busy in the Jersey section today. I have added a section to Bailiff (Channel Islands) looks at the role of the Bailiff within its wider historical context as suggested re McGonnell vs. United Kingdom in the Politics of Jersey page. See what you think. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.20.183.38 (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Have also updated this in the History section of the States of Jersey page.

DariusJersey 17:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, wishful thinking I guess... edited accordingly

DariusJersey 18:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, nice. Was reading another bit of interesting history the other day while researching for the newsletter. Ever heard of a former Lt. Governor Sir Tomkyns Hilgrove Turner (Hilgrove Street is named after him) most interesting man. Are you going to the Battle of Jersey re-enactment walk on the 6th? DariusJersey

Jersey Green Party

[edit]

Just noticed that on the List of political parties in Jersey this party had indicated that it had reformed in 2005 and listed two members Stuart Syvret and Geraint Jennings. Just wondering if this was correct. DariusJersey

John St Helier Lander

[edit]

Can you check the ISBN for The Royal Court and States Building, Philip Le Brocq, 1998, Jersey. Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 22:58 15 January 2007 (GMT). Thanks for that. It is an invalid number as it stands (1 digit short), which is not an unknown occurance. Rich Farmbrough, 09:53 16 January 2007 (GMT).

Languages of the European Union: A prolonged discussion over new member states data.

[edit]

As there is an ongoing and rather prolonged discussion over some data about the new member states in Languages_of_the_European_Union#Language_skills_of_European_Union_citizens, please see the discussion in Talk:Languages_of_the_European_Union#2007_update and, as you have recently contributed to the article, you may want to add some comment. --Michkalas 20:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For rewrite Gallo, you should read my note before, and read fr:mayennais too. Perche in my mind, speak a dialect closer gallo than Norman. 86.72.170.26 13:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC), i.e. fr:User:Vincnet[reply]

Lit l'article gallo en français, pour le reste tu dois quand même comprendre mon texte. quatre points doivent être évoqués :
  • Il y a un continuum linguistique entre les normands, le poitevin et les langues de l'île de France. Si bien qu'il est difficile de définir une zone précise. La seule vraie frontière claire se trouve entre la zone des bretons et du gallo.
  • plus s'avance vers l'est moins l'influance du breton se fait sentir si bien qu'a partir de la mayenne, le gallo n'est plus du tout influancé par le breton.
  • L'accent peut varier beaucoup, un manceau) ne comprendra grand chose d'un mayennais, un mayennais ne comprendra pas grand chose d'un rennais. Cependant, le vocabulaire, la grammaire etc, tout montre qu'il sagit bien de dialects apparentés, ce distinguant du normand (par l'abscence des termes scandinaves notamment), du poitevin etc...
  • le contexte social et économico-politique, qui provoque la tentative de normalisation avec le dialecte gallo de Haute bretagne n'est pas forcement un acte neutre. 86.72.170.26 14:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

par conséquent, en accord avec ce qu'a écrit Svartalf, l'article ne respecte pas actuellement la théorique neutralité de point de vue, voir est completement trompeur. fr:User:Vincnet

Dolmens

[edit]

Thanks for tidying up the Jersey Dolmens article. Tony —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tony theprof (talkcontribs) 15:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

General Tidyup

[edit]

Thanks for generally tidying up and adding pictures to my additions. If any parts need additional bibliographical references, I can probably add details on the appropriate books.

--TonyinJersey 16:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Churches

[edit]

Thanks for tidying up / adding pix to the St brelade's Church and Fisherman's Chapel.

--TonyinJersey 09:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balliene

[edit]

Thanks for your usual stalwart work in making the article look respectably Wiki!

There is one on St Aubin on the Hill, and also Norman Le Brocq, if you have time to look at those.

--TonyinJersey 07:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's all try not to potentially by any chance possible offend anybody at all ever

[edit]

Dear Person,

I have seen that you have taken it unto yourself to remove images from the Jersey article that might possibly be perceived as potentially offending by another person. Under the strictest condition that it would not offend you the slightest I commend your actions. If however you are offended by me drawing attention towards you or your action or if there is even the slightest chance that another person might somehow find themselves affected detrimentally in their enjoyment of the utterly unoffended state then I withdraw this commendation with prejudice. Never being offended for any reason whatsoever is one of the New Freedoms we are given to enjoy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.160.250.209 (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

New Pages - Jersey Politicians

[edit]

I've added new material - Cyril Le Marquand, and John Le Fondre. Would you be able to work your usual wikifying magic? Thanks.

--TonyinJersey 14:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Le Clare

[edit]

Thanks for the "tone down". I only added to this one, not one of my creations as you probably saw, some anonymous "talk" person actually put in the words that you took out - probably the same one who put in a libellous statement on the Stuart Syvrey one, which I agree are OTT. My rules of thumb for political biogs are dib, education and career, States major positions, possibly outside interests if notable, no opinions, but possible short quote to show kind of platform. If living family, no details of them at all, which I think is most important.

--TonyinJersey 14:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erasing vandalism

[edit]

Hello, Man vyi! Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thanks! --AW 16:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify please

[edit]

If you get the chance:

De La Salle College, Jersey

Thanks

The link should be De La Salle College, Jersey --TonyinJersey 15:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Francaise?

[edit]

Tu parle francaise? Je parle francaise. If u can't understand that, you just answered my question!! CONTACT ME FOR TALK AND I HAVE SOME POLLS ON MY PAGE!!BEATLES RULE!!! go fonz! 21:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify

[edit]

If you get the chance: Jersey Eastern Railway

Thanks --TonyinJersey 08:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu script needed

[edit]

Hakim Habibur Rahman needs urdu script for the name of the subject (Bangla script has already been added). Can you help? Aditya Kabir 09:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listing the names of the EU institutions...

[edit]

...in the official languages of the EU in Languages of the European Union is absolutely redundant. Maybe there is a place for this kind of information in the article of its institution - if it is necessary to mention something like that somewhere. I will remove the tables from this article if it is OK. Please, answer at the talk page of the article. --Michkalas 12:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


New articles on Norman language

[edit]

The following articles are hopefully of interest to you (I see you have looked at "-hou"): Cotentinais (the latter chunk has been translated from French by Babelfish, which as usual has produced some odd effects, George Métivier & Template:Norman language. --MacRusgail 16:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions - Cauchois & Gabriel Benoist‎. --MacRusgail 17:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recent addition: Augeron. I also plan to attempt a translation ofméridional when I've time. --MacRusgail 20:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurów on Jèrriais

[edit]

Could you please write a stub about my hometown on Jèrriais here - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur%C3%B3w or FR wiki? Only 3-5 sentences enough. Please.

PS. Article about Kurów is already on 171 languages. If your village/town/city hasn't on PL wiki, I can do article about it. (I'm first author of requests) Pietras1988 TALK 20:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Beans and peas

[edit]

The pea and bean categories don't make much sense, it's not clear what should be included in the categories since there is no real botanical distinction between a pea and a bean - and a bean can be anything that grows in a pod, see this; I'm trying to get a more useful category for edible legumes to replace the pea and bean categories. I think that a category for Category:legume dishes would be good inside category:Food; but I'll wait until the peas and beans thing is sorted out. --Peta 00:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I went ahead and made the dishes category. --Peta 00:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Jersey

[edit]

Just drawing your attention to the fact that I added a television section to the Culture of Jersey article, and have also created a Culture of Guernsey article too (which needs tidying up). I have also added Guernesiais nicknames to each of the Guernsey parish articles, and a wee bit to the St Ouen article about how the Sercquais came from there. --MacRusgail 15:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria College, Jersey

[edit]

Helllo. It looks like we both have an interest in the school which is excellent. Can you clarify something for me. You mention that the school is not 'OV'. What do you mean by this? Second, I was under the impression the school was a public school (member of HMC) and als fee paying. Is there some querk of Jersey law?

Victoria College, Jersey

[edit]

Responding to your response to my previous post:

Hello. Thanks for the work on Vic. No problem. Enjoyed it For the cat:, the School itself is not an OV (Old Victorian) so shouldn't be in the Old Victorians category - but the category page contains a link to the Vic article. Interesting point and agreed. Link to Cat is useful from the main page however. Perhaps a second link within the Eminent Alumni heading would suffice (‘for alumni in alphabetical order see...’ or something of that nature.) The status of the school is slightly bizarre in that it is owned by the public, but a member of HMC. The existence of a fee-paying sector within States-provided education in Jersey sometimes seems odd to outsiders..... I see. It looks like another user has changed the reference again by the way, for clarity.

BTW, I'm not certain that Queen Victoria can be described as being the Founder without being somewhat misleading. What do you think? My mistake. Do you know who founded the College?

Some Jersey politics issues

[edit]

Looking for some informed comment on:

Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_3#.5B.5B:Darius_J_Pearce.5D.5D

and

Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Daverotherham

I have pulled out the copyright info from the Volaw site and added to the discussion page. Personal use of the text is allowed without permission and I hardly think that this is commercial use.

Also there are significant differences in content, which I have done a quick re-edit on to enhance and expand on (for example the ECHR position). This includes additional information which is not found in the Volaw source.

See what you think now.

RichardColgate 20:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a deletion of this page and merge with the main article Victoria College, Jersey. Only the very famous public schools such as Eton and Harrow who have a significant number of notable pupils seem to maintain lists. See what you think.

RichardColgate 20:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding that photo, evey bit helps! —Muckapædia 15e juil. 2007, 3h25 (UTC+0900) '''머크패저''' TALK/CONTRIBS

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for the great picture on the British-Irish Council page. Its fab!

I saw your post on the British Isles page as well, and (as a strong "pro-Channel Isles being in the British Isles" partisan) wondered what you thought - I'm guessing you're from Jersey? --sony-youthpléigh 13:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotish notes

[edit]

They have no holograms for a start, meaning they have to be held up to the light to be sure they are real, unlike the Hologram notes where you just have to look at them. They also have no Ultraviolet, or at least many of them don't.

Have made a major expansion to this page, you may wish to check it out. Was bored also did Frank Walker (Jersey politician) and Terry Le Main [User:RichardColgate|RichardColgate]] 02:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Today's batach starts with young Philip. RichardColgate 19:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"ex-colonies"

[edit]

I just don't think it's right. They stopped being called colonies, but I don't think that makes them ex-colonies? More to the point, doesn't it make just as much sense without the "ex" ? Biofoundationsoflanguage 08:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many Overseas Territories do now have more autonomy. But for the Falklands and Saint Helena the Governor still very much is in charge and for them the name change would've been little more than that, a name change. I think 'Dependencies' may confuse things with Jersey, IOM, and Guernsey. Despite my name, I'm not a language expert. But when I saw "ex-colonies" it threw me a bit, and I bet it would throw others too. Biofoundationsoflanguage 08:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Righto. That seems to be a good compromise. Biofoundationsoflanguage 10:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Older Jersey elections

[edit]

Am in the middle of Jersey_general_election,_2002, do you reckon it would be a copyvio to take the older results for Geraint Jennings politics page?

RichardColgate 13:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have done elections all the way back to 1993 see List of elections in Jersey RichardColgate 17:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sub Categorisation of Category:People from Jersey

[edit]

As part of the ongoing sub categorisation of Category:People from Jersey I am requesting that Category:People_by_educational_institution_in_Jersey be changed to Category:People from Jersey by educational institution. You may like to join the debate. RichardColgate 06:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also requested speedy rename of Category:Jersey_people_by_religion to Category:People from Jersey by religion. This should bring all sub cats in line with the naming conventions RichardColgate 06:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You !

[edit]

Dear Man. Thanks for importing the picture to Trooping the Colour. I think you will be pleased with the used to which it is put. I am considering two other articles (both short and relatively uncomplicated), which will need an image or 2, and will contact you again in due course. Many thanks again. --FClef (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Dear WilyD and User:Man vyi - I have received an extraordinary message on my talk page from one User:Jeff G..

Here is my reply.

I'm copying this note to User:WilyD and will still come to both of you for help when needed - mercifully not too often!  :-) -- FClef (talk) 03:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know Jeff G. has sent me a very nice reply clarifying things.
And by the way, I love the Wace on your User page. --FClef (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crown dependancy place infobox

[edit]

Hello, I've noticed you're a Wikipedian in or from the Channel Islands. There is a discussion found here regarding the possible use of the Template:Infobox UK place on settlement articles relating to the three Crown dependancies of the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.

It's a very strong infobox with alot of automation, flexibility and localised mapping, (examples are found at Kirkwall or Chew Valley) and though is entitled with "UK", wouldn't formally display the United Kingdom in any article. I'd welcome you to discuss if this is a good idea for these island's towns and villages. Hope to hear from you, Jza84 23:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions aside wiki

[edit]

I was interested in chatting with someone from the Channel isles who is/claims to be Norman. Is there any way to communicate with you on the internet than Wikipedia? Matthieu 17:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Would you be interested in proof reading the sections of the articles I listed on the French language talk page? Or perhaps you know of a user who could help? Thank you! --Mrlopez2681 (talk) 06:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ételan

[edit]

J'ai supprimé votre apport sur la famille "Picard d'Estelan" qui n'a rien à voir avec le château d'Etelan. La Famille PICARD a ajouté "d'Estelan" à son nom à la fin du XIX ème siècle selon les dires de l'Amiral qui fut un ami personnel. Cordialement.Etelan (talk) 23:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC) (propriétaire du château d'Etelan)[reply]

Occupation of the Channel Islands

[edit]

Please see Talk:Occupation of the Channel Islands#Title or a descriptive name --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 10:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to your reply on the Talk:Occupation of the Channel Islands the issue is specific to that page and it saves repeating the conversation with others at a later date. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perchon

[edit]

I have been wondering what to make of "Peurch'ron" on the Norman wikipedia. The French language article is only a sentence, and the Norman one goes on a bit longer (but I don't understand it all) - is it worth including this on the English wikipedia. Thanks...--MacRusgail (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Windmills in the Channel Islands

[edit]

If the Grantez entry is a duplicate, please delete it and mention Grantez at the appropriate entry. Mjroots (talk) 07:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guernsey Parishes

[edit]

Hi. Although in spoken English, Guernsey residents will use the genitive noun for parishes, e.g. St Sampson's, this is wrong, and it should simply be St Sampson.

See the states of guernsey website.

Thus I believe we should correct this problem on the Guernsey page and thus on the individual pages for the parishes.

I hope you agree. I am not sure how to edit a page title.

Thanks.

as6782 —Preceding unsigned comment added by As6782 (talkcontribs) 17:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guernsey Parishes

[edit]

Thanks for that. I forgot that it would break the link if I changed the name. I will change the names soon - it may take some time to change every manifiestation. Do you think this is the concensus? I may anger some Guernsey residents who probably think otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by As6782 (talkcontribs) 18:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found poetry

[edit]

Hey. I noticed you helped out in found poetry in 2003, and it has since stagnated. I was wondering if you can help out, or at least put in on your watchlist. --Justpassin (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of children's rights in the UK

[edit]

I will defer to your expertise - sorry to doubt it; just trying to be studious. • Freechild'sup? 07:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, For the record, whilst interesting in terms of political development, I find the question of dependency etc somewhat abstruse and irrelevant in the context of child abuse.SJB (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have registered that the content of the Timeline goes beyond what is factually correct; it is in this context that I feel the reference to activities in Jersey should be included.SJB (talk) 10:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of such a page, surely it is appropriate to record the fact that abuse practices are not inhibited by moral, legal OR geographical boundaries. Indeed the case cited highlights the very real relationship between the jurisdictions in term of the exportation of such practices (or importation depending on the viewpoint adopted).SJB (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I infer that you seek to leave the island's reputation unsullied by a mysterious, vicarious distancing process. Ah well. The facts about abuse of children's rights begin to speak louder than the more sanitised versions of history. SJB (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your viewpoint is noted, but not accepted. Stalemate.SJB (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the link, which shall read with the sinking heart that usually accompanies such reading matter. And no, I don't intend to start an article about Jersey, so all remains well in that best of all possible worlds.SJB (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, here is the BBC classification: ”Jersey is a Crown Dependency - it is largely self governing, although the UK Ministry of Justice provides a link with the island as some UK legislation is extended to it. ”[1] Ergo Jersey is part of the UK for the purposes of criminal justice.SJB (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, perhaps you should clarify the position to the Ministry of Justice and the BBC? The ubiquity of UK officials in both the Williamson and Haut de la Garenne enquiries, suggest that both agencies are labouring under a delusion. Or perhaps the UK's Citizenship remit extends to child abuse?SJB (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I respectfully suggest that selective reading is less than appropriate. You omitted the remianing functions of the MOJ, namely: “We provide the main channel of communication between the UK government and the three crown dependencies. We process legislation from Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man for royal assent and we consult with the islands on extending UK legislation to them. We are also responsible for recommending crown appointments in the islands. (My emphases.) SJB (talk) 22:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your amplification details a status of equal partnership, which renders your original claim that: " Jersey is not a part of the UK; the UK is irrelevant to this question" entirely spurious. Checkmate. SJB (talk) 09:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh.SJB (talk) 11:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect in this context. Encyclopedic information requires to be factually correct - irrespective of personal opinions. Please simply accept this and move on.SJB (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Railway

[edit]

Hi, I've found a picture of Haro Haro. Not sure about date (and thus copyright status) though. Will leave it to you to decide if the picture is worth adding to the article. Mjroots (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Sark elections

[edit]

Thank you so much! Merci....whatever it is in Sark-French. Realllly useful addition to my stub of an article, thanks for helping! doktorb wordsdeeds 22:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current events globe On 10 December, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Sark general election, 2008, which you helped update. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--SpencerT♦C 21:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Victory

[edit]

As the source made clear, it was thought that Victory had been lost on/near the casquets, which is why I though it was relevant to the article.

Ouitchipédie

[edit]

Merlicoqùet seems to be having a certain problem with the Ouitchipédie. I do not understand what is wrong, and I've asked him to tell me in French (as I think I would understand better what's going on). He did want me to "prevent" (from prevenir, I'll warrant) you about it, though, so here's a head's up. The Jade Knight (talk) 02:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hauteville House

[edit]

You tagged the article Hauteville House. Does it meet with the requirements for removing the copyedit tag? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rv edits by Man vyi-revision 294749239 censored content and whitewashed all of WWII.

[edit]

concerning this subject, i deleted what formally followed. i was wrong.-- diremarc (talk) 01:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC) (i hope you do not mind this tampering with your talk page. i am embarrassed by my indulgence in such intemperate talk.)[reply]

also, your revisions to channel island are understood. when i get into a tear and try to conform every related article i tend to err on the side of excess and generate lists that are overkill. again, i appreciate how you do no let things go to the tchians.-- diremarc (talk) 01:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

British Lit

[edit]

Regards your comment, sure add them to English Novel/Lit.. but dont remove them from British Literature page for the simple fact it encompasses all major British works, whereas the likes of English Lit page includes novels/works that are non British.

In terms of specifics.. i have a section toward the bottom i've still to tidy (prior to major British novlelists of 20th century) that was rough, will be refined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.84.197 (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B.Jones was British book of the year and also had major cultural impact, Guns of Navarone as a literary text was highly influential that Peck, Quinn and Niven starred in its adaptation - while tarantino referenced it ss being one of three that inspired his new war film. As contemporary works they are both significant.. that section im cleaning up its structure. 81.140.84.197 (talk) 08:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True.. but the war text is from a British standpoint hence its literary significance, while contemporary bestsellers such as B.Jones have had significant cultural impact..and of someone living in London, bear in mind British literature is reflection of its society, hence relevance. Again, that section is rough and reads like a list of novels like you said, needs formatted/prioritised as i was collecting various works.81.140.84.197 (talk) 09:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like i said, im refining the 3rd to last paragraph as indeed only the author should be listed in most cases and not the actual book which is more suited to English novel, unless it a significant work that merits it such as Birdsong, Pillars of the Earth.81.140.84.197 (talk) 19:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ogier (law firm)

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ogier (law firm), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogier (law firm). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cmichael (talk) 03:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Islands info box

[edit]

I'm thinking it might be good if the Channel Islands could have an infobox similar to Template:Infobox Scottish island. The language box could be changed to Norman, or something like that.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nice pictures. Les Burons look like a sea monster! I'm afraid the pictures I uploaded are not of such quality, but here's a few of them anyway:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ortac.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brecqhou-north.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brecqhou-southeast.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hermdunord.jpg

I have older ones from the 80s I might upload at some point. I would like to see the outlying fort(let)s of Alderney get a few articles, e.g. Fort Clonque, and Crevichon lacks a modern picture.

It goes without saying that the two Bailiwicks are separate, so maybe some provision could be made there, but that can presumably be fixed on the template.

As an example of what could be achieved with some of the articles, I think Ulva is a good example. The Scottish Island project managed to change this from little more than a stub into a B class article. I'm going to have to revisit the various CI articles and improve the referencing I did. By the way, do you have a copy of Victor Coysh's "Channel Islets" handy? I used it for a lot of material, but unfortunately I've mislaid my copy (too many books). For decent referencing, we might need page numbers. --MacRusgail (talk) 15:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC) p.s. The same template was transferred fairly successfully to Falkland Islands usage e.g. West Falkland, Pebble Island[reply]


Rugby in the Channel Islands

[edit]

I have started off these two articles - Rugby union in Guernsey & Rugby union in Jersey. (One of my other interests, but I don't know much about the level of the game in the islands, other than it's there, and been continuously played for a while)--MacRusgail (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey: uninhabited islands

[edit]

Hi. I'm interested in why you reverted my minor edit ('nearly' to 'nearby') relating to Jersey's offshore rocks and islands. What is your source for believing that 'nearly' is what was intended? They certainly aren't 'nearly inhabited' - whatever that means! Dhmellor (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response on my talk page. I take your point, but I still feel that 'nearly uninhabited' is probably a misprint, if only because its meaning is so opaque. As it happens I'm on a working visit to Jersey at the moment. I walked around the north-east coast of the island this morning, and had a good stare at the Ecrehous through the binoculars: the buildings there look in surprisingly good condition. Anyway, I have tweaked the sentence in the article to clarify: I hope you agree it's an improvement. Regards. Dhmellor (talk) 14:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Ensign

[edit]

Hi, I did post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jersey about the new Civil Ensign for Jersey but I've not had a reply yet. Any thoughts? Mjroots (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thanase Pequeu 1933.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thanase Pequeu 1933.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De-orphing Alderney Wildlife Trust

[edit]
Is there any particular reason why you have undone all the links I found?? There was a de-orp template there before! Renata (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar

[edit]

Hi, would it be possible for you to get a photograph of Jersey's most famous cat? Mjroots (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

The caption for the image you added to War artist is a crucial addition. In my view, the information is too important to be relegated to a caption. If you would only provide the source, we could work together to create a few introductory sentences in the French section and -- more importantly -- we could integrate this information into the main text at the top of the page.

According to your caption, the functional usage of of public displays of war art in France during WWI differs somewhat from the Japanese use of sensō sakusen kirokuga ("war campaign documentary painting") created by official war artists in the First Sino-Japanese War, the Russo-Japanese War and the Pacific War. Working together, we may avoid "original research" by simply positioning two short paragraphs next to each other, thereby leaving the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.

If your time is limited, you might simply cite the source; and then, when you have more time, you can return to this. --Tenmei (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of islands by highest point

[edit]

Hi, I was just curious as to why you changed the descriptions of Guernsey etc. in List of islands by highest point from "crown dependency of the  United Kingdom" to "British crown dependency". Your edit description was "not dependencies of UK" - but surely "British" and "of the UK" mean the same thing. Can you explain please? Cheers, Bazonka (talk) 20:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sark page

[edit]

Greetings. You referenced the page http://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDocuments/Government%20and%20administration/R%20Guernsey%20LOs%20Submission%2020100330%20HR%20v1.pdf

which is a Jersey-based page. Your user page also states that you are based on Jersey. I therefore concluded that your opinions were coming from Jersey.

Sark is within the Bailiwick of Guernsey but has an independent relationship with the Crown (albeit via the same person, the Lieutenant Governor in Guernsey). It is no more "an autonomous part" of the Bailiwick of Guernsey than Jersey is "an autonomous part" of the United Kingdom.

I have never heard of the idea of Sark being owned by the Crown in right of the "Republique of Guernsey" before, nor has any of the Guernsey Advocates nor Chief Pleas members I have asked about this. Where is this information coming from? It is not stated anywhere in the documents you reference. I would be very interested in seeing any document which state that Sark is owned by the Crown in right of a Republique of Guernsey. I have given a more detailed account, with some references, on the Talk:Sark page. The question of "in which right" the Crown owns Sark is quite a subtle one and arose in the important legal case recently (2009) argued in the House of Lords (the Supreme Court) in the context of whether the Human Rights Act of 1998 applied to acts performed by members of HM Privy Council advising the Queen on matters of Sark. Suffice to say that none of the parties involved in the case argued that the Crown owned Sark in right of Republique of Guernsey; one side (who was also being advised by the Guernsey Law Officers) claimed it was owned in right of the Duchy of Normandy and the other that it was owned in its own right. In the end, it was decided that it was not in the right of the Duchy of Normandy because the Crown had renounced its claim to the Duchy of Normandy in the Treaty of Brétigny in 1360 and so the Duchy of Normandy no existed. I have written more about this on the Talk:Sark page.

(La.coupee (talk) 14:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I cannot find it stated anywhere in your document that the passage which talks about the Republique of Guernsey refers to Sark. Can you please point me to the point in the document where it says this refers to Sark?

I cannot give you a better wording for "autonomous within"; I can only give a different, correct, wording, because "autonomous within" is simply wrong. Is Jersey "autonomous within" the United Kingdom? While Sark is administratively within the Bailiwick of Guernsey, its relationship with the Crown is independent, and the right in which the Crown owns Sark is separate from the right in which it owns Guernsey - the difference is much the same as between Jersey and Guernsey. I have provided a reference which explains the nature of this independent relationship, namely the Hansard, the Privy Council web page listing the Orders in Council etc. Leolin Price's opinion clearly states that the Queen is the sovereign of Sark, not of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, of which Sark is a part.

(La.coupee (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sark. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Just to be totally clear, my locking of the page is not an endorsement of the current version of the article. What I do want to see is the pair of you discussing the issue on the talk page, and an agreement as to the wording and sources reached. I've got the article watchlisted for now, so will be able to see who is communicating and who is not. Refusal to cooperate may be seen as grounds for action. As I said, the reason I did not block was because I want to see you two working the issue out, which you can't do if you are blocked, can you?

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mjroots (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Learning Jèrriais

[edit]

Hello, I went to Jersey in 2008 and I liked it a lot. Today, two years later, I wonder if there are any resources for learning Jèrriais, if I’d like to learn some basics. Would you know? I already speak French at a semi-high level. How different is it and what are the main differences? Cheers! :) Lundgren8 19:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Press-up to "Push-up"

[edit]

As a user who has participated in move discussions for the article Press-up, I invite you to weigh in on the move discussion currently under way: Talk:Press-up#Requested_move_2. -Clconway (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Athelstan Riley

[edit]

Just a quick note of appreciation and thanks for greatly improving the Athelstan Riley article. Feline Hymnic (talk) 10:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Elections 2011

[edit]

Hello,

I have started a 2011 elections page which I'd appreciate assistance with.

RichardColgate (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Using the JEP as a 'reliable source' with regard to Walker

[edit]

I have started a discussion on the talk page of Frank Walker on this subject, as a regular contributor, I wondered if you had any thoughts. RichardColgate (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hill (Jersey politician)

[edit]

Please contribute to the debate on proposed deletion for non-notability of the new article on ex-Deputy Bob Hill Bob Hill (Jersey politician) Andrew Le Sueur (talk)

The Crown

[edit]

Thanks for adding new information to the article The Crown. However, bare urls aren't allowed as references. Perhaps you could be so good as to use the proper reference templates for the citations you added? The templates can be found at Wikipedia:Citation templates. Thanks. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Thanase Pequeu 1933.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thanase Pequeu 1933.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Guernsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catchment area (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of rock formations in the United Kingdom

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of rock formations in the United Kingdom, an article that you have participated in editing, regarding the scope of the list and a proposal. --20:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slovak literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francophone literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evan Evans (poet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watkin Williams Wynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George F. Le Feuvre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaspé (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theatr Genedlaethol Cymru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

British literature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Buddha of Suburbia
Réunionnais literature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Malagasy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devolution in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assemblies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature of Northern Ireland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anglic and David Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:British literature

[edit]

Hello, This is about my recent addition to that page; the writing of it began many hours ago and when finished none of the saving attempts were successful. It is only a personal way of looking at this complex area. After the rejection of the map I was hoping to leave this article alone as arguing over the British Isles and its various parts does not die down.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Guernsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort George (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Normandy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help requested

[edit]

Hi I've noticed some of your edits to articles I watch. I was involved in an epic wiki-debate last year around the creation of Politics in the British Isles - the article survived but is still in need of much work, and I think your assistance would be most welcome if you're willing. The crux of the "delete" arguments were that the crown dependencies were not sovereign, and therefore all relations between the entities in the British isles should just be slotted under Anglo-Irish relations, a position I happened to disagree with. I think it would be interesting to expand the multilateral relations section on the ways in which the crown dependencies behave in light of the Dublin/London axis, and how they use their position to their advantage - I've seen some interesting writing on this - and there are interesting developments, such as Guernsey's relations with Dublin. We could also add more on additional intergovernmental bodies, expand the section on citizenship and citizens rights, the section on movements (and similarities/differences across various countries in the isles), and finally on scholarship of identity. Anyway, I welcome your thoughts and contributions. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 19:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Man vyi.

You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Windmill articles

[edit]

I started a discussion at Talk:Windmills in the Channel Islands asking about the split (which was ignored). I eventually reverted the split as per WP:BRD and I see you've simply reverted into separate articles again without discussion. I've reverted once again. Can you outline your reasoning at the Talk page before any further action? Not trying to be difficult, but in my opinion the article was fine as it was. Thanks. --HighKing (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theatre of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan Ramsay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National anthem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National holiday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mont Saint-Michel in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germanus of Normandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flamanville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]

Hi, were you planning on submitting Theatre of Jersey for DYK? If you weren't, would you mind me submitting it? Thanks, Matty.007 10:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Theatre of Jersey) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Theatre of Jersey, Man vyi!

Wikipedia editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great!

To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Man vyi. You have new messages at Matty.007's talk page.
Message added 10:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Matty.007 10:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Theatre of Jersey

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Theatre of Jersey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 21:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I see now that the nomination was done by Matty.007, will post there instead. --Soman (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Occupation of the Channel Islands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Ireland
Theatre of Wales (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Temperance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Theatre of Jersey

[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 13:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trinitarian Church of Bratislava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovak National Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renaissance literature

[edit]

Hello again, I see British literature is getting some considerable improvements. As part of it concerns the Renaissance perhaps you could review the article Renaissance literature which seems fairly short for such an important subject. The way influences passed from one country to others in the lliterature of the period makes it difficult to summarize. Surprisingly the Norwegians are ahead of the English and French WPs so far on this topic.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Man vyi, I thought that you may be interested in this portal which I set up. Thanks, Matty.007 15:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

[edit]
Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Channel Islands. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to articles related to the Channel Islands. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page. Thank You!

Matty.007 08:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of mottos

[edit]

The article List of mottos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a just a random list of stuff that fails WP:NOT: Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. I'm notifiying you as the first significant editor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Preservation des Langues de France sur les projets Wikimédia

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je travaille à Wikimédia France pour développer la place des langues régionales sur Wikipédia, Wiktionnaire et Commons. Page projet. Un Wikipédien m'a orienté vers ton travail concernant l'île de Jersey et je suis très intéressé pour discuter avec toi des enregistrements sons que tu as fait. C'est un superbe travail. Tu peux me contacter par mail : remy.gerbet@wikimedia.fr

Merci,

(Si tu préfères discuter en anglais c'est possible)

--Xenophon75 (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Réunionese literature listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Réunionese literature. Since you had some involvement with the Réunionese literature redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Book (divination with) listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Book (divination with). Since you had some involvement with the Book (divination with) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of windmills in Guernsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails LISTN/LISTPURP. A collection of non-notable windmills does not add up to a decent list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of windmills in Guernsey for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of windmills in Guernsey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of windmills in Guernsey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vaticidalprophet (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article British poetry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, violates WP:VNT, WP's core policy

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Catchment area (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Catchment area (disambiguation) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catchment area (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catchment area (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]