Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sak 433/Archive

Sak 433

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both users appear to be throw-away accounts created for the purpose of politically motivated edits to the article on Safoora Zargar.

12:04 User account Sak 433 was created ‎
Sak 433 12:09, 28 May 2020 changes "known_for = Leading Citizenship Amendment Act protests" to "known_for = Leading Delhi Riots resulted in deaths of 53 people"
Sak 433 12:39-13:02, 28 May 2020 changes "known_for = Leading Citizenship Amendment Act protests" to "known_for = Leading Delhi Riots resulted in deaths of 53 people"
Sak 433 13:21, 28 May 2020 inserts "According to left media" into sentence with citation
Sak 433 13:23-13:28, 28 May 2020 changed "spouse = Saboor Ahmed Sirwal" to "spouse = Not known"
Sak 433 14:00-14:01, 28 May 2020 changed "known_for = being arrested as a result of taking part in the Citizenship Amendment Act protests" to "known_for = leading Delhi riots resulted in deaths of 53 people"
14:34 EdJohnston blocked Sak 433 talk contribs with an expiration time of 72 hours (account creation blocked) ‎(Vandalism and POV-pushing at Safoora Zargar. Per a complaint at WP:AIV)

13:40 User account Shakunimama was created ‎
Shakunimama 14:15, 28 May 2020 changed "known_for = being arrested as a result of taking part in the Citizenship Amendment Act protests" to "known_for = leading Delhi riots resulted in deaths of 53 people"
Shakunimama 14:22, 28 May 2020 changed "known_for = being arrested as a result of taking part in the Citizenship Amendment Act protests" to "known_for = leading Delhi riots resulted in deaths of 53 people"

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It's Possible / Inconclusive from a technical standpoint. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Reaper Eternal and Callanecc: similar usernames, identical edits, account creations within an hour of each other. WP:DUCK. I'd block the sock as proven and a 2-week block for the master. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RoySmith, yep sounds good. I normally only use proven when I've got strong behavioural evidence combined with a likely, or maybe possilikely, result but there's no issue using it here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
blocked, tagged, closing -- RoySmith (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.